Effect of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001767
Brendan Holderread, Ishaq Syed, Caleb Shin, Leonide Toussaint, Andrew Lewis, David Botros, Ioannis Avramis, James Rizkalla
{"title":"Effect of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.","authors":"Brendan Holderread, Ishaq Syed, Caleb Shin, Leonide Toussaint, Andrew Lewis, David Botros, Ioannis Avramis, James Rizkalla","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine erector spinae plane block on a large, comprehensive scale, and investigate the management of postoperative pain and recovery process after lumbar spine surgery using this block.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Pain management is a key aspect of a patient's care and overall surgical outcome regarding spinal surgery. While most patients have no issues when undergoing spinal surgery, many have pain that will persist postoperation. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks before lumbar arthrodesis in helping manage the persisting pains and opioid consumption postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blinded randomized control trial was designed and executed on patients who were to undergo lumbar spine fusion. Before their surgical intervention, patients were randomly assigned to receive the erector spinae plane block or the normal anesthesia/pain management routine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 49 patients, 23 (47%) underwent a spinal block before their respective lumbar spine procedure. Patients with spinal block required fewer supplemental opioids postoperatively (69.9±6.66 vs. 71.7±5.70, P= 0.0002) while reporting less severe pain on VAS pain scoring throughout the first 3 postoperative days (P< 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient population that received the erector spinae block had significantly lower pain scores on days 1-3 postsurgery, showing that the spine block is effective in helping patients recover from spinal surgery quicker and with less persisting pain. In addition, the number of patients who filled their first opioid prescription was approaching significance, with the ESP block group filling those prescriptions less frequently. ESP blocks appear to be efficacious at reducing pain and opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period. No additional complications or readmissions were apparent between subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Randomized control trial.

Objective: To examine erector spinae plane block on a large, comprehensive scale, and investigate the management of postoperative pain and recovery process after lumbar spine surgery using this block.

Summary of background data: Pain management is a key aspect of a patient's care and overall surgical outcome regarding spinal surgery. While most patients have no issues when undergoing spinal surgery, many have pain that will persist postoperation. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks before lumbar arthrodesis in helping manage the persisting pains and opioid consumption postsurgery.

Methods: A single-blinded randomized control trial was designed and executed on patients who were to undergo lumbar spine fusion. Before their surgical intervention, patients were randomly assigned to receive the erector spinae plane block or the normal anesthesia/pain management routine.

Results: Of a total of 49 patients, 23 (47%) underwent a spinal block before their respective lumbar spine procedure. Patients with spinal block required fewer supplemental opioids postoperatively (69.9±6.66 vs. 71.7±5.70, P= 0.0002) while reporting less severe pain on VAS pain scoring throughout the first 3 postoperative days (P< 0.0001).

Conclusions: The patient population that received the erector spinae block had significantly lower pain scores on days 1-3 postsurgery, showing that the spine block is effective in helping patients recover from spinal surgery quicker and with less persisting pain. In addition, the number of patients who filled their first opioid prescription was approaching significance, with the ESP block group filling those prescriptions less frequently. ESP blocks appear to be efficacious at reducing pain and opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period. No additional complications or readmissions were apparent between subgroups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Treatment of Single-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability, a 2-year Follow-up Study. Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Hip Displacement Following Spinal Fusion in Nonambulant Patients With Spastic Neuromuscular Scoliosis. A Correlation Among the Most Classic Axis Injuries Classification and the New AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System. Fusion Outcomes of GLP-1 Agonist Therapy in Multilevel Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Safety and Utility of Bilateral-contralateral Decompression for Adjacent Segment Stenosis After Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1