Radiofrequency thermocoagulation in focal epilepsy: A retrospective cohort study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70009
Alejandra Vasquez, Karimul Islam, Madeline R. Cross, Kai J. Miller, Jamie J. Van Gompel, Brian Nils Lundstrom, Anthony L. Fine
{"title":"Radiofrequency thermocoagulation in focal epilepsy: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Alejandra Vasquez,&nbsp;Karimul Islam,&nbsp;Madeline R. Cross,&nbsp;Kai J. Miller,&nbsp;Jamie J. Van Gompel,&nbsp;Brian Nils Lundstrom,&nbsp;Anthony L. Fine","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided RFTC) has been increasingly used as diagnostic and therapeutic approach for drug-resistant focal epilepsies (DREs). We aimed to describe seizure outcomes of RFTC before and after further neurosurgical intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective single-institution case series of patients who underwent SEEG-RFTC. The primary outcome was Engel class I–IV classification ([responders Engel I–III and non-responders Engel IV]) at last follow-up after RFTC and prior to further neurosurgical intervention (open surgical resection, laser ablation, and neuromodulation).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five patients (median age 18.9 years) with DRE were included. The median follow-up time after RFTC was 7.2 months, including 20 patients who underwent further intervention (median follow-up time of 7.3 months) and 5 without intervention (median of 3.5 months). From the patients who had further intervention, 17 (85%) underwent surgical procedure (laser ablation 53%, open surgical resection 47%) (median 4.4 months) and 3 (15%) had responsive neurostimulators placed (median 6.9 months). Prior to further intervention (median follow-up 3.5 months after RFTC), 12 (48%) patients were classified as responders (12% Engel class I, 16% class II, and 20% class III) and 13 (52%) as non-responders. Following neurosurgical intervention, 17 (68%) patients were followed for a median time of 2.7 months and 3 were lost to follow-up. Of eight initial RFTC responders, 87.5% and 12.5% had Engel classes I and III, respectively. Of nine who were non-responders, 33% had Engel class I, 22% II and III, and 44% IV outcomes following further intervention. No neurologic complications were reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and a beneficial diagnostic approach prior to further neurosurgical interventions in patients with DRE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and in the patients who experienced initial seizure reduction (<i>n</i> = 8), subsequent neurosurgical intervention (surgery or neuromodulation) led to favorable seizure outcomes (87.5% seizure freedom and 12.5% worthwhile seizure improvement).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"529-538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG-guided RFTC) has been increasingly used as diagnostic and therapeutic approach for drug-resistant focal epilepsies (DREs). We aimed to describe seizure outcomes of RFTC before and after further neurosurgical intervention.

Methods

Retrospective single-institution case series of patients who underwent SEEG-RFTC. The primary outcome was Engel class I–IV classification ([responders Engel I–III and non-responders Engel IV]) at last follow-up after RFTC and prior to further neurosurgical intervention (open surgical resection, laser ablation, and neuromodulation).

Results

Twenty-five patients (median age 18.9 years) with DRE were included. The median follow-up time after RFTC was 7.2 months, including 20 patients who underwent further intervention (median follow-up time of 7.3 months) and 5 without intervention (median of 3.5 months). From the patients who had further intervention, 17 (85%) underwent surgical procedure (laser ablation 53%, open surgical resection 47%) (median 4.4 months) and 3 (15%) had responsive neurostimulators placed (median 6.9 months). Prior to further intervention (median follow-up 3.5 months after RFTC), 12 (48%) patients were classified as responders (12% Engel class I, 16% class II, and 20% class III) and 13 (52%) as non-responders. Following neurosurgical intervention, 17 (68%) patients were followed for a median time of 2.7 months and 3 were lost to follow-up. Of eight initial RFTC responders, 87.5% and 12.5% had Engel classes I and III, respectively. Of nine who were non-responders, 33% had Engel class I, 22% II and III, and 44% IV outcomes following further intervention. No neurologic complications were reported.

Significance

SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and a beneficial diagnostic approach prior to further neurosurgical interventions in patients with DRE.

Plain Language Summary

SEEG-guided RFTC is a well-tolerated procedure and in the patients who experienced initial seizure reduction (n = 8), subsequent neurosurgical intervention (surgery or neuromodulation) led to favorable seizure outcomes (87.5% seizure freedom and 12.5% worthwhile seizure improvement).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局灶性癫痫的射频热凝术:回顾性队列研究
目的:立体脑电图引导下射频热凝(SEEG-guided RFTC)已越来越多地用于耐药局灶性癫痫(DREs)的诊断和治疗。我们的目的是描述RFTC在进一步神经外科干预之前和之后的癫痫发作结果。方法:回顾性的单机构病例系列患者接受了SEEG-RFTC。在RFTC后和进一步神经外科干预(开放手术切除、激光消融和神经调节)之前的最后随访中,主要结局是Engel I-IV级([响者Engel I-III和无响者Engel IV])。结果:纳入25例DRE患者(中位年龄18.9岁)。RFTC后中位随访时间为7.2个月,其中进一步干预20例(中位随访时间7.3个月),未干预5例(中位随访时间3.5个月)。在接受进一步干预的患者中,17例(85%)接受了外科手术(激光消融53%,开放手术切除47%)(中位4.4个月),3例(15%)接受了反应性神经刺激(中位6.9个月)。在进一步干预之前(RFTC后中位随访时间为3.5个月),12例(48%)患者被分类为应答者(12%为Engel I级,16%为II级,20%为III级),13例(52%)为无应答者。神经外科干预后,17例(68%)患者随访中位时间为2.7个月,3例失访。在8个最初的RFTC应答者中,87.5%和12.5%分别为Engel I级和III级。在9名无反应的患者中,33%的患者在进一步干预后达到Engel I级,22%为II和III级,44%为IV级。无神经系统并发症报道。意义:seeg引导下的RFTC是一种耐受性良好的手术,在DRE患者进一步神经外科干预之前是一种有益的诊断方法。简单的语言总结:seeg引导的RFTC是一种耐受性良好的手术,在经历了初始癫痫发作减少(n = 8)的患者中,随后的神经外科干预(手术或神经调节)导致了良好的癫痫发作结果(87.5%的癫痫发作自由和12.5%的癫痫发作改善)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of etiology and drug resistance in children with new-onset focal seizures. Areas of research priorities in epilepsy: A position paper of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE. A two-sample Mendelian randomization study and mediation analysis exploring the link between cathepsins and epilepsy. Comparison of the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of Perampanel and Levetiracetam as monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures: A single-center, ambispective, open-label, real-world observational study. The diagnostic value of semiology, EEG and MRI in new-onset pediatric bilateral tonic-clonic seizures: A multimodal analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1