Xavier Llorens Martínez, Leonardo Ruiz Macarrilla, Sergi Rey-Viñolas, Miguel A Mateos-Timoneda, Elisabeth Engel, J M Mora Guix
{"title":"Study of bone-tendon interface healing in an animal model using a synthetic scaffold and PRP.","authors":"Xavier Llorens Martínez, Leonardo Ruiz Macarrilla, Sergi Rey-Viñolas, Miguel A Mateos-Timoneda, Elisabeth Engel, J M Mora Guix","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02796-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Biological matrices have been used to reinforce large rotator cuff tear repairs. However, rapid resorption and initial immune reactions presented challenges in clinical practice. This study evaluates whether a resorbable synthetic matrix (scaffold), used alone or with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), impacts repair processes at microscopic, ultrasound, and biomechanical levels in a rabbit model of induced tendon-bone interface injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An experimental study was performed on 24 rabbits. Two experimental groups (n = 12 each) and a control group (n = 24) were defined. In the first group (BioP), the internal gastrocnemius tendon was sectioned and repaired to bone using double-row sutures, reinforced with a PLC (poly-L-lactic-co-ε-caprolactone) and PLA (polylactic acid) scaffold. In the second group (BioP + PRP), autologous PRP was added to the repair. The control group received no scaffold or PRP. Euthanasia was performed at 8 weeks, followed by microscopic, ultrasound, and biomechanical evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Microscopically, a granulomatous reaction limited to the foreign body was observed in both scaffold groups. The healing process was not altered in any group, showing good biocompatibility of the scaffold. Echographically, a greater sagittal diameter was observed in the group without PRP compared to the other groups. Biomechanically, no significant differences in rupture zones were found across groups, but the scaffold-only group required a higher maximum applied force before rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At 8 weeks, using a degradable synthetic PLC and PLA scaffold as support at the bone-tendon interface did not significantly alter the normal repair process, showed echographic and biomechanical benefits, and PRP did not show additional benefits in our experimental model.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02796-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Biological matrices have been used to reinforce large rotator cuff tear repairs. However, rapid resorption and initial immune reactions presented challenges in clinical practice. This study evaluates whether a resorbable synthetic matrix (scaffold), used alone or with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), impacts repair processes at microscopic, ultrasound, and biomechanical levels in a rabbit model of induced tendon-bone interface injury.
Methods: An experimental study was performed on 24 rabbits. Two experimental groups (n = 12 each) and a control group (n = 24) were defined. In the first group (BioP), the internal gastrocnemius tendon was sectioned and repaired to bone using double-row sutures, reinforced with a PLC (poly-L-lactic-co-ε-caprolactone) and PLA (polylactic acid) scaffold. In the second group (BioP + PRP), autologous PRP was added to the repair. The control group received no scaffold or PRP. Euthanasia was performed at 8 weeks, followed by microscopic, ultrasound, and biomechanical evaluations.
Results: Microscopically, a granulomatous reaction limited to the foreign body was observed in both scaffold groups. The healing process was not altered in any group, showing good biocompatibility of the scaffold. Echographically, a greater sagittal diameter was observed in the group without PRP compared to the other groups. Biomechanically, no significant differences in rupture zones were found across groups, but the scaffold-only group required a higher maximum applied force before rupture.
Conclusions: At 8 weeks, using a degradable synthetic PLC and PLA scaffold as support at the bone-tendon interface did not significantly alter the normal repair process, showed echographic and biomechanical benefits, and PRP did not show additional benefits in our experimental model.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries.
Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.