Risk factors of angle opening after lens extraction in patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber.

Yue Fu, Yufeng Chen, Xiuqin Li, Lingzi Huang, Lufan Li, Nan Zhang, Yixin Hu, Wen Zeng, Min Ke
{"title":"Risk factors of angle opening after lens extraction in patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber.","authors":"Yue Fu, Yufeng Chen, Xiuqin Li, Lingzi Huang, Lufan Li, Nan Zhang, Yixin Hu, Wen Zeng, Min Ke","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06784-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To predict the degree of angle opening after lens extraction (LE) in patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected the ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) parameters before and one month after LE retrospectively. The binary logistic regression and artificial neural network (ANN) models of angle opening after LE were established using preoperative UBM parameters, and the predictive factors were screened. The performances of models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients from the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University were randomized into a training set (n = 91) or a test set (n = 39) for internal validation. External validation employed the entire Zhongnan Hospital cohort as the training set (n = 130) and Dawu County People's Hospital cohort as the test set (n = 30). Both internal and external validation using both models showed that iris curvature (IC), iris-ciliary process angle (ICPA), trabecular-iris angle (TIA), and gender were significantly predictive of the degree of angle opening after LE (p < 0.05). Both models achieved an AUROC of 0.993 (0.997-1.0) in the internal validation training set, and an AUROC of 0.929 (0.774-1.0) in the internal validation test set. In the external validation training set, both models achieved an AUROC of 0.995 (0.984-1.0), while in the external validation test, both models had an AUROC of 0.938 (0.800-1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber, a smaller preoperative TIA, ICPA and IC predicts unsatisfactory angle opening after LE. Female can also be a risk factor for the narrow angle after LE.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06784-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To predict the degree of angle opening after lens extraction (LE) in patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber.

Methods: We collected the ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) parameters before and one month after LE retrospectively. The binary logistic regression and artificial neural network (ANN) models of angle opening after LE were established using preoperative UBM parameters, and the predictive factors were screened. The performances of models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: Patients from the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University were randomized into a training set (n = 91) or a test set (n = 39) for internal validation. External validation employed the entire Zhongnan Hospital cohort as the training set (n = 130) and Dawu County People's Hospital cohort as the test set (n = 30). Both internal and external validation using both models showed that iris curvature (IC), iris-ciliary process angle (ICPA), trabecular-iris angle (TIA), and gender were significantly predictive of the degree of angle opening after LE (p < 0.05). Both models achieved an AUROC of 0.993 (0.997-1.0) in the internal validation training set, and an AUROC of 0.929 (0.774-1.0) in the internal validation test set. In the external validation training set, both models achieved an AUROC of 0.995 (0.984-1.0), while in the external validation test, both models had an AUROC of 0.938 (0.800-1.0).

Conclusion: In patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber, a smaller preoperative TIA, ICPA and IC predicts unsatisfactory angle opening after LE. Female can also be a risk factor for the narrow angle after LE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal changes in ocular biometry and their effect on intraocular lens power calculation accuracy in cataract patients. Risk factors of angle opening after lens extraction in patients with shallow peripheral anterior chamber. Reexamine the link between retinal layer thickness and cognitive function after correction of axial length: the Beijing Eye Study 2011. Optimizing instilled drug delivery: a scoping review of microdrops in ophthalmology. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after manual capsulorhexis on one eye and precision pulse capsulotomy on the other eye.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1