Effect of diabetes medications on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1177/13872877251319054
Esther K Hui, Naaheed Mukadam, Gianna Kohl, Gill Livingston
{"title":"Effect of diabetes medications on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment, or cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Esther K Hui, Naaheed Mukadam, Gianna Kohl, Gill Livingston","doi":"10.1177/13872877251319054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diabetes is a risk factor for dementia, but we do not know whether specific diabetes medications ameliorate this risk. <b>Objective:</b> To systematically review and meta-analyze such medication's effect on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or cognitive decline. <b>Methods:</b> We searched three databases until 21 November 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT), cohort, and case-control studies assessing association between antidiabetic medication and future dementia, MCI, or cognitive decline. We meta-analyzed studies separately for individual drug classes and their comparators (no medication, placebo, or another drug). We appraised study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. <b>Results:</b> 42 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus placebo reduced dementia risk by 53% in three RCTs (n = 15,820, RR = 0.47[0.25, 0.86]) and 27% in three case-control studies (n = 312,856, RR = 0.73[0.54, 0.99], I<sup>2 </sup>= 96%). Repaglinide was superior to glibenclamide by 0.8 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination scale in another RCT. Meta-analysis of seven longitudinal studies showed glitazones (n = 1,081,519, RR = 0.78[0.76, 0.81], I<sup>2 </sup>= 0%) were associated with reduced dementia risk. Metformin (n = 999,349, RR = 0.94[0.79, 1.13], I<sup>2 </sup>= 98.4%), sulfonylureas (RR = 0.98[0.78, 1.22], I<sup>2 </sup>= 83.3%), dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (DPP-1V) (n = 192,802, RR = 0.86[0.65, 1.15], I<sup>2 </sup>= 92.9%) and insulin (n = 571,274, RR = 1.09[0.95, 1.25], I<sup>2 </sup>= 94.8%) were not. Most studies were observational and limited by confounding by indication. <b>Conclusions:</b> In people with diabetes, RCTs consistently showed GLP-RAs reduce future dementia risk. Glitazones consistently showed protective effects, without heterogeneity, suggesting potential generalizability of these results. Metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin, and DPP-1V studies had inconsistent findings. If information is available future studies should consider dosage, severity, and duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251319054"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251319054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is a risk factor for dementia, but we do not know whether specific diabetes medications ameliorate this risk. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze such medication's effect on the risk of developing dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or cognitive decline. Methods: We searched three databases until 21 November 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT), cohort, and case-control studies assessing association between antidiabetic medication and future dementia, MCI, or cognitive decline. We meta-analyzed studies separately for individual drug classes and their comparators (no medication, placebo, or another drug). We appraised study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Results: 42 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus placebo reduced dementia risk by 53% in three RCTs (n = 15,820, RR = 0.47[0.25, 0.86]) and 27% in three case-control studies (n = 312,856, RR = 0.73[0.54, 0.99], I2 = 96%). Repaglinide was superior to glibenclamide by 0.8 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination scale in another RCT. Meta-analysis of seven longitudinal studies showed glitazones (n = 1,081,519, RR = 0.78[0.76, 0.81], I2 = 0%) were associated with reduced dementia risk. Metformin (n = 999,349, RR = 0.94[0.79, 1.13], I2 = 98.4%), sulfonylureas (RR = 0.98[0.78, 1.22], I2 = 83.3%), dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors (DPP-1V) (n = 192,802, RR = 0.86[0.65, 1.15], I2 = 92.9%) and insulin (n = 571,274, RR = 1.09[0.95, 1.25], I2 = 94.8%) were not. Most studies were observational and limited by confounding by indication. Conclusions: In people with diabetes, RCTs consistently showed GLP-RAs reduce future dementia risk. Glitazones consistently showed protective effects, without heterogeneity, suggesting potential generalizability of these results. Metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin, and DPP-1V studies had inconsistent findings. If information is available future studies should consider dosage, severity, and duration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:糖尿病是痴呆症的一个风险因素,但我们还不知道特定的糖尿病药物是否能降低这一风险。目的系统回顾和荟萃分析此类药物对痴呆症、轻度认知障碍(MCI)或认知能力下降风险的影响。研究方法我们检索了三个数据库,检索时间截至 2023 年 11 月 21 日。我们纳入了评估抗糖尿病药物与未来痴呆症、MCI 或认知能力下降之间关系的随机对照试验 (RCT)、队列研究和病例对照研究。我们分别对各个药物类别及其比较对象(不用药、安慰剂或其他药物)的研究进行了荟萃分析。我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和物理治疗证据数据库量表对研究质量进行了评估。结果42项研究符合纳入标准。在三项研究中,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)与安慰剂相比,痴呆症风险降低了53%(n = 15,820, RR = 0.47[0.25, 0.86]),在三项病例对照研究中,痴呆症风险降低了27%(n = 312,856, RR = 0.73[0.54, 0.99], I2 = 96%)。在另一项研究中,瑞格列奈在迷你精神状态检查量表上优于格列本脲 0.8 分。对七项纵向研究进行的元分析表明,格列酮类药物(n = 1,081,519, RR = 0.78[0.76, 0.81], I2 = 0%)与痴呆风险的降低有关。二甲双胍(n = 999 349,RR = 0.94[0.79,1.13],I2 = 98.4%)、磺脲类(RR = 0.98[0.78,1.22],I2 = 83.而磺脲类药物(RR=0.98[0.78, 1.22],I2=83.3%)、二肽基肽酶-IV 抑制剂(DPP-1V)(n=192 802,RR=0.86[0.65, 1.15],I2=92.9%)和胰岛素(n=571 274,RR=1.09[0.95, 1.25],I2=94.8%)则不包括在内。大多数研究为观察性研究,受适应症混杂因素的限制。结论:在糖尿病患者中,RCT 研究一致表明 GLP-RAs 可降低未来痴呆症的风险。格列酮类药物始终显示出保护作用,且无异质性,这表明这些结果具有潜在的普遍性。二甲双胍、磺脲类、胰岛素和 DPP-1V 的研究结果不一致。如果有相关信息,未来的研究应考虑剂量、严重程度和持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Predicting future risk of developing cognitive impairment using ambulatory sleep EEG: Integrating univariate analysis and multivariate information theory approach. Effects of exercise on older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Genetic geroscience and Alzheimer's disease: The pleiotropy is the point! Validation of the Cognitive-Emotional Perspective Taking test in patients with neurodegeneration. Measures of retinal health successfully capture risk for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias at midlife.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1