The extended speech reception threshold model: Predicting speech intelligibility in different types of non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
{"title":"The extended speech reception threshold model: Predicting speech intelligibility in different types of non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners.","authors":"Koenraad S Rhebergen, Wouter A Dreschler","doi":"10.1121/10.0035833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The speech reception threshold (SRT) model of Plomp [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63(2), 533-549 (1978)] can be used to describe SRT (dB signal-to-noise ratio) for 50% of sentences correct in stationary noise in normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. The extended speech reception threshold model (ESRT) [Rhebergen et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2181-2192 (2010)] was introduced to describe the SRT in non-stationary noises. With the ESRT model, they showed that the SRT in non-stationary noises is, contra to the SRT in stationary noise, dependent on the non-stationary noise type and noise level. We examine with SRT data from the literature, whether the ESRT model can also be used to predict SRT in individual NH and HI listeners in different types of non-stationary noise based on a single SRT measurement in quiet, stationary, and non-stationary noise. The predicted speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in non-stationary noises in NH and HI listeners correspond well with the observed SRTs independent of the used non-stationary spectral or temporal masking, or noise masking levels. The ESRT model cannot only be used to describe the SRT within a non-stationary noise but can also be used to predict the SRTs in other non-stationary noise types as a function of noise level in NH and HI listeners.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 2","pages":"1500-1511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0035833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The speech reception threshold (SRT) model of Plomp [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63(2), 533-549 (1978)] can be used to describe SRT (dB signal-to-noise ratio) for 50% of sentences correct in stationary noise in normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. The extended speech reception threshold model (ESRT) [Rhebergen et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2181-2192 (2010)] was introduced to describe the SRT in non-stationary noises. With the ESRT model, they showed that the SRT in non-stationary noises is, contra to the SRT in stationary noise, dependent on the non-stationary noise type and noise level. We examine with SRT data from the literature, whether the ESRT model can also be used to predict SRT in individual NH and HI listeners in different types of non-stationary noise based on a single SRT measurement in quiet, stationary, and non-stationary noise. The predicted speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in non-stationary noises in NH and HI listeners correspond well with the observed SRTs independent of the used non-stationary spectral or temporal masking, or noise masking levels. The ESRT model cannot only be used to describe the SRT within a non-stationary noise but can also be used to predict the SRTs in other non-stationary noise types as a function of noise level in NH and HI listeners.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.