Performance evaluation of an under-mattress sleep sensor versus polysomnography in > 400 nights with healthy and unhealthy sleep

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14480
Jack Manners, Eva Kemps, Bastien Lechat, Peter Catcheside, Danny J. Eckert, Hannah Scott
{"title":"Performance evaluation of an under-mattress sleep sensor versus polysomnography in > 400 nights with healthy and unhealthy sleep","authors":"Jack Manners,&nbsp;Eva Kemps,&nbsp;Bastien Lechat,&nbsp;Peter Catcheside,&nbsp;Danny J. Eckert,&nbsp;Hannah Scott","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumer sleep trackers provide useful insight into sleep. However, large-scale performance evaluation studies are needed to properly understand sleep tracker accuracy. This study evaluated performance of an under-mattress sensor to estimate sleep and wake versus polysomnography in a large sample, including individuals with and without sleep disorders and during day versus night sleep opportunities, across multiple in-laboratory studies. One-hundred and eighty-three participants (51%/49% male/female, mean [SD] age = 45 [18] years) attended the sleep laboratory for a research study including simultaneous polysomnography and under-mattress sensor (Withings Sleep Analyser) recordings. Epoch-by-epoch analyses determined accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the Withings Sleep Analyser versus polysomnography. Bland–Altman plots examined bias in sleep duration, efficiency, onset-latency, and wake after sleep onset. Overall Withings Sleep Analyser sleep–wake classification accuracy was 83%, sensitivity 95% and specificity 37%. The Withings Sleep Analyser significantly overestimated total sleep time (48 [81] min), sleep efficiency (9 [15]%) and sleep-onset latency (6 [26] min), and underestimated wake after sleep onset (54 [78] min). Accuracy and specificity were higher for night versus daytime sleep opportunities in healthy individuals (89% and 47% versus 82% and 26%, respectively, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Accuracy and sensitivity were also higher for healthy individuals (89% and 97%) versus those with sleep disorders (81% and 91%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Withings Sleep Analyser performance is comparable to other consumer sleep trackers, with high sensitivity but poor specificity compared with polysomnography. Withings Sleep Analyser performance was reasonably stable, but more variable in daytime sleep opportunities and in people with a sleep disorder. Contactless, under-mattress sleep sensors show promise for accurate sleep monitoring, noting the tendency to over-estimate sleep particularly where wake time is high.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jsr.14480","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsr.14480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer sleep trackers provide useful insight into sleep. However, large-scale performance evaluation studies are needed to properly understand sleep tracker accuracy. This study evaluated performance of an under-mattress sensor to estimate sleep and wake versus polysomnography in a large sample, including individuals with and without sleep disorders and during day versus night sleep opportunities, across multiple in-laboratory studies. One-hundred and eighty-three participants (51%/49% male/female, mean [SD] age = 45 [18] years) attended the sleep laboratory for a research study including simultaneous polysomnography and under-mattress sensor (Withings Sleep Analyser) recordings. Epoch-by-epoch analyses determined accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the Withings Sleep Analyser versus polysomnography. Bland–Altman plots examined bias in sleep duration, efficiency, onset-latency, and wake after sleep onset. Overall Withings Sleep Analyser sleep–wake classification accuracy was 83%, sensitivity 95% and specificity 37%. The Withings Sleep Analyser significantly overestimated total sleep time (48 [81] min), sleep efficiency (9 [15]%) and sleep-onset latency (6 [26] min), and underestimated wake after sleep onset (54 [78] min). Accuracy and specificity were higher for night versus daytime sleep opportunities in healthy individuals (89% and 47% versus 82% and 26%, respectively, p < 0.05). Accuracy and sensitivity were also higher for healthy individuals (89% and 97%) versus those with sleep disorders (81% and 91%, p < 0.05). Withings Sleep Analyser performance is comparable to other consumer sleep trackers, with high sensitivity but poor specificity compared with polysomnography. Withings Sleep Analyser performance was reasonably stable, but more variable in daytime sleep opportunities and in people with a sleep disorder. Contactless, under-mattress sleep sensors show promise for accurate sleep monitoring, noting the tendency to over-estimate sleep particularly where wake time is high.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
床垫下睡眠传感器与多导睡眠仪在400个健康和不健康睡眠夜晚的性能评价
消费者睡眠追踪器提供了对睡眠的有用洞察。然而,需要大规模的性能评估研究来正确理解睡眠跟踪器的准确性。本研究在多个实验室研究中,评估了床垫下传感器的性能,以评估睡眠和清醒情况与多导睡眠图的对比,包括有睡眠障碍和无睡眠障碍的个体,以及白天和晚上的睡眠机会。183名参与者(51%/49%男性/女性,平均[SD]年龄= 45岁)参加了睡眠实验室的研究,包括同步多导睡眠仪和床垫下传感器(Withings睡眠分析仪)记录。逐时代分析确定了Withings睡眠分析仪与多导睡眠仪的准确性、灵敏度和特异性。Bland-Altman图检验了睡眠持续时间、效率、发病潜伏期和睡眠开始后醒来的偏倚。总体而言,Withings Sleep Analyser睡眠-觉醒分类准确率为83%,灵敏度为95%,特异性为37%。Withings睡眠分析仪显著高估了总睡眠时间(48[81]分钟)、睡眠效率(9[15]%)和睡眠开始潜伏期(6[26]分钟),并低估了睡眠开始后的觉醒时间(54[78]分钟)。健康个体夜间睡眠机会比白天睡眠机会的准确性和特异性更高(分别为89%和47%,而不是82%和26%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Smart Lighting and Mindfulness Interventions: Pathways to Better Health and Learning in High School Education. Sleep Knowledge and Cognitions and Their Relation to Behavioural Sleep Indices. Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia Compared to Sleep Health Education in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Insomnia: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial. Sleep-Related Attentional Bias in Insomnia: A Drift Diffusion Model Approach. The Effect of 6 Months of Dietary Counselling on Sleep Outcomes Among Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1