A Scoping Review of the Quality of Orthodontic Information on YouTube.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12913
Maurice J Meade, Emilija Jensen, Brianna Poirier
{"title":"A Scoping Review of the Quality of Orthodontic Information on YouTube.","authors":"Maurice J Meade, Emilija Jensen, Brianna Poirier","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>YouTube is among the most popular social media platforms globally. The aim of this scoping review was to collate and synthesise the evidence related to the quality of information (QOI) about orthodontic-related videos uploaded to YouTube. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines were employed by two independent researchers to search and screen the literature over four electronic databases. The study topics were assigned into one of five general categories: 'Appliances', 'Orthodontic conditions', 'Orthodontics', 'Quality of life' and 'Treatment techniques and auxiliaries'. The searches initially returned 82 unique records. A total of 35 cross-sectional studies, evaluating 3129 videos with more than 181,563,304 views, were identified for systematic appraisal after the application of selection criteria. The findings indicated that YouTube plays a prominent role in the provision and sharing of orthodontic-related information. Although the information provided by orthodontic treatment providers was of slightly higher quality, the overall quality of all orthodontic information was generally poor. The studies covered a wide range of orthodontic-related subjects, with those related to appliances, especially clear aligners, being commonplace. Evaluation of the QOI frequently involved the use of the modified DISCERN, video information quality index (VIQI) and global quality score (GQS) tools. Content analysis was employed in most studies, but there was considerable heterogeneity in the use and reporting of this approach. Improvement of the quality of videos, either with or without the involvement of professional bodies, was frequently recommended by the studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

YouTube is among the most popular social media platforms globally. The aim of this scoping review was to collate and synthesise the evidence related to the quality of information (QOI) about orthodontic-related videos uploaded to YouTube. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines were employed by two independent researchers to search and screen the literature over four electronic databases. The study topics were assigned into one of five general categories: 'Appliances', 'Orthodontic conditions', 'Orthodontics', 'Quality of life' and 'Treatment techniques and auxiliaries'. The searches initially returned 82 unique records. A total of 35 cross-sectional studies, evaluating 3129 videos with more than 181,563,304 views, were identified for systematic appraisal after the application of selection criteria. The findings indicated that YouTube plays a prominent role in the provision and sharing of orthodontic-related information. Although the information provided by orthodontic treatment providers was of slightly higher quality, the overall quality of all orthodontic information was generally poor. The studies covered a wide range of orthodontic-related subjects, with those related to appliances, especially clear aligners, being commonplace. Evaluation of the QOI frequently involved the use of the modified DISCERN, video information quality index (VIQI) and global quality score (GQS) tools. Content analysis was employed in most studies, but there was considerable heterogeneity in the use and reporting of this approach. Improvement of the quality of videos, either with or without the involvement of professional bodies, was frequently recommended by the studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Plaque-Identifying Toothpaste on Plaque Amount in 12-16-Year-Olds With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial. Sagittal Cephalometric Characteristics in Females With Turner Syndrome in Comparison to Nonsyndromic Females: A Meta-Analysis. A Scoping Review of the Quality of Orthodontic Information on YouTube. Upper Airway Morphofunctional Changes During Oropharyngeal Exercises for Sleep-Disordered Breathing. The Effectiveness of Functional Clear Aligners for Class II Correction in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1