[Contact-restricting measures in care facilities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and their impact on residents - a plea].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2476-9220
Ursel Heudorf, Kristin Stalla
{"title":"[Contact-restricting measures in care facilities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and their impact on residents - a plea].","authors":"Ursel Heudorf, Kristin Stalla","doi":"10.1055/a-2476-9220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, residents of care homes for the elderly were at a particularly high risk of contracting the virus and dying from it. Strict protective measures were therefore taken, including bans on visits. However, the negative effects of these contact-restricting measures on the mental and physical health, quality of life, right to self-determination and ultimately the dignity of the residents soon became apparent and the question was raised as to whether isolation (confinement disease) was even more harmful to health than the disease itself. Statements on infection control measures in care facilities, studies with the views of those affected (residents, relatives, employees in care facilities) and interviews with residents of care facilities as well as reviews on adverse effects of the protective measures were researched. The search included both so-called \"gray literature\" and publications from PubMed. The residents suffered greatly from isolation and from the fact that decisions were made about them without consulting them. They complained about the loss of their autonomy and felt that their dignity was violated. The reviews showed that the residents generally experienced loneliness, anxiety, sadness and depression more frequently, and in some cases also physical deterioration. In future, care must be taken to achieve a good balance from a legal and health perspective between protection against infection and protection of the mental and physical health, well-being and quality of life of residents, respect for autonomy, the right to self-determination and the dignity of residents. This requires a broad social discussion in which not only experts from the fields of infectiology but also from the fields of geriatrics, nursing, public health, ethics and law, but in particular also those affected themselves or their representatives, their relatives, are heard and their arguments taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":"359-368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2476-9220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, residents of care homes for the elderly were at a particularly high risk of contracting the virus and dying from it. Strict protective measures were therefore taken, including bans on visits. However, the negative effects of these contact-restricting measures on the mental and physical health, quality of life, right to self-determination and ultimately the dignity of the residents soon became apparent and the question was raised as to whether isolation (confinement disease) was even more harmful to health than the disease itself. Statements on infection control measures in care facilities, studies with the views of those affected (residents, relatives, employees in care facilities) and interviews with residents of care facilities as well as reviews on adverse effects of the protective measures were researched. The search included both so-called "gray literature" and publications from PubMed. The residents suffered greatly from isolation and from the fact that decisions were made about them without consulting them. They complained about the loss of their autonomy and felt that their dignity was violated. The reviews showed that the residents generally experienced loneliness, anxiety, sadness and depression more frequently, and in some cases also physical deterioration. In future, care must be taken to achieve a good balance from a legal and health perspective between protection against infection and protection of the mental and physical health, well-being and quality of life of residents, respect for autonomy, the right to self-determination and the dignity of residents. This requires a broad social discussion in which not only experts from the fields of infectiology but also from the fields of geriatrics, nursing, public health, ethics and law, but in particular also those affected themselves or their representatives, their relatives, are heard and their arguments taken into account.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在COVID-19大流行的背景下,护理机构的接触限制措施及其对居民的影响-一项请求]。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,养老院的居民感染病毒并死于该病毒的风险特别高。因此采取了严格的保护措施,包括禁止探访。然而,这些限制接触措施对身心健康、生活质量、自决权以及最终对居民尊严的负面影响很快就显现出来,有人提出了一个问题,即隔离(禁闭病)对健康的危害是否比疾病本身更大。研究了护理机构感染控制措施的陈述、受影响者(护理机构的居民、亲属、员工)的观点研究、护理机构居民的访谈以及防护措施的不良影响的综述。搜索包括所谓的“灰色文献”和PubMed的出版物。居民们深受孤立和有关他们的决定没有征求他们意见的事实的折磨。他们抱怨失去了自主权,觉得自己的尊严受到了侵犯。调查显示,住院医生普遍更频繁地经历孤独、焦虑、悲伤和抑郁,在某些情况下还会出现身体恶化。今后,必须注意从法律和健康的角度在防止感染与保护居民的身心健康、福祉和生活质量、尊重自治、自决权和居民的尊严之间取得良好的平衡。这需要进行广泛的社会讨论,不仅来自传染病学领域的专家,而且来自老年病学、护理学、公共卫生、伦理和法律领域的专家,特别是那些受影响的人自己或他们的代表、他们的亲属,都要听取意见,并考虑到他们的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Medical Training on Climate Change and Health: Evaluation of an Online Learning Format for Outpatient Care. Integration of Real-World Data into Clinical Trials: An Interdisciplinary Discussion from Regulatory and Practical Perspectives. [Need for Improvement in Healthcare Provision for Rare Endocrinological Diseases in Germany Using the Example Endogenous Cushing's Syndrome]. [Cross-sector regional care networks to ensure needs-based (inpatient) care in times of crisis: results of focus group discussions with healthcare providers]. [Correction: DNVF Memorandum Participatory Health Services Research (Part 1)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1