New regression-based norms for the Trail Making Test on Norwegian older adults: Understanding the effect of education.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2025.2469940
Therese Händel Waggestad, Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, Carsten Strobel, Linda Gjøra, Geir Selbæk, Peter Bekkhus-Wetterberg, Olav Aga, Jens Egeland
{"title":"New regression-based norms for the Trail Making Test on Norwegian older adults: Understanding the effect of education.","authors":"Therese Händel Waggestad, Bjørn-Eivind Kirsebom, Carsten Strobel, Linda Gjøra, Geir Selbæk, Peter Bekkhus-Wetterberg, Olav Aga, Jens Egeland","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2469940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To produce regression-based norms for older adults on the revised Trail Making Test with alphabet support (TMT-NR3). By examining the potential modulating effects and putative interaction effects of age, education, and sex, we aim to gain insights into cognitive aging and the effects of education. <b>Method:</b> Altogether, 440 healthy participants with an age-span from 70 to 92 years from the NorFAST (<i>n</i> = 249) and the HUNT (<i>n</i> = 191) studies were included. Regression-based norms for TMT-A, TMT-B, and derived measures TMT B-A, TMT B/A, and TMT-β were produced. Models were assessed for pertinent linear, curvilinear, or interaction effects of age, education, and sex. We evaluated and compared our norms to published North American TMT norms. <b>Results:</b> Higher age was linearly associated with lower performance on all measures. No sex differences were found. We found a reduced positive association with education on test performance at higher age. However, this interaction effect was found to be driven by participants with low education. Our validated proposed norms showed a better fit to observed data than the existing norms. <b>Conclusion:</b> The norms were adjusted for age on all measures. Norms without age adjustment are made available for TMT B/A due to a slightly better fit of this model. The results indicate (i) that only processing speed and not set-shifting declines with age and (ii) that the selection process for education might be more important than actual education for older-age performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2469940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To produce regression-based norms for older adults on the revised Trail Making Test with alphabet support (TMT-NR3). By examining the potential modulating effects and putative interaction effects of age, education, and sex, we aim to gain insights into cognitive aging and the effects of education. Method: Altogether, 440 healthy participants with an age-span from 70 to 92 years from the NorFAST (n = 249) and the HUNT (n = 191) studies were included. Regression-based norms for TMT-A, TMT-B, and derived measures TMT B-A, TMT B/A, and TMT-β were produced. Models were assessed for pertinent linear, curvilinear, or interaction effects of age, education, and sex. We evaluated and compared our norms to published North American TMT norms. Results: Higher age was linearly associated with lower performance on all measures. No sex differences were found. We found a reduced positive association with education on test performance at higher age. However, this interaction effect was found to be driven by participants with low education. Our validated proposed norms showed a better fit to observed data than the existing norms. Conclusion: The norms were adjusted for age on all measures. Norms without age adjustment are made available for TMT B/A due to a slightly better fit of this model. The results indicate (i) that only processing speed and not set-shifting declines with age and (ii) that the selection process for education might be more important than actual education for older-age performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
期刊最新文献
Adapting the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised with Semantic Cues: Assessing diagnostic utility in a Spanish clinical population. New regression-based norms for the Trail Making Test on Norwegian older adults: Understanding the effect of education. Ability of the D-KEFS Color-Word Interference Test as an embedded measure to identify noncredible neurocognitive performance in personal injury litigants. Demographically-adjusted norms for Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT) for Sri Lankan adults. The risk of bias - symptom and performance validity (RoB-spv): a risk of bias checklist for systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1