Trends in patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and associated complications over time in pelvic organ prolapse repair

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2025-04-17 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.054
Hilla Rosenberg , Noa Leybovitz-Haleluya , Alla Saban , Adi Y. Weintraub , Reut Rotem
{"title":"Trends in patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and associated complications over time in pelvic organ prolapse repair","authors":"Hilla Rosenberg ,&nbsp;Noa Leybovitz-Haleluya ,&nbsp;Alla Saban ,&nbsp;Adi Y. Weintraub ,&nbsp;Reut Rotem","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate trends in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgical repair procedures and patient characteristics over the past decade, focusing on <em>peri</em>-operative and post-operative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study analyzed POP surgeries and short-term complications among women over 18 at a tertiary medical center from 2014 to 2022. Exclusion criteria included pelvic radiation, malignancy, significant comorbidities, incomplete records, or loss to follow-up. Complications were assessed using the Clavien–Dindo Classification, focusing on infection rate, antibiotic use, blood transfusions, readmission within 30 days, and Intensive care unit admission. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 490 women, with 239 in 2014 and 251 in 2022. A decrease in invasive procedures, such as vaginal hysterectomy (25.1 % vs. 15.1 %, p &lt; 0.01) and transabdominal hysterectomy (42.7 % vs 23.1 %, p &lt; 0.01), alongside an increase in native tissue repairs like sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) (2.1 % vs. 27.5 %, p &lt; 0.01), anterior colporrhaphy (14.6 % vs. 24.7 %, p &lt; 0.01), and posterior colporrhaphy (0.0 % vs. 2.4 %, p = 0.02), was noted. Additionally, the use of vaginal mesh decreased (4.2 % vs. 1.2 %, p = 0.04). Short-term complications significantly declined, including infection rate (10.9 % vs. 4.4 %, p &lt; 0.01), post-operative antibiotics (10.9 % vs. 4.0 %, p &lt; 0.01) and need for blood transfusion (16.7 % vs. 7.6 %, p &lt; 0.01). SSLF was an independent protective factor against short-term complications (OR = 0.191, CI 0.044–0.826, p = 0.027), adjusted for year and patient age.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our analysis suggests a shift toward less invasive POP surgeries, potentially contributing to improved short-term outcomes. The increase in native tissue repairs and reduction in hysterectomies may be associated with fewer short-term complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 116-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030121152500123X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate trends in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgical repair procedures and patient characteristics over the past decade, focusing on peri-operative and post-operative complications.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed POP surgeries and short-term complications among women over 18 at a tertiary medical center from 2014 to 2022. Exclusion criteria included pelvic radiation, malignancy, significant comorbidities, incomplete records, or loss to follow-up. Complications were assessed using the Clavien–Dindo Classification, focusing on infection rate, antibiotic use, blood transfusions, readmission within 30 days, and Intensive care unit admission. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed.

Results

The study included 490 women, with 239 in 2014 and 251 in 2022. A decrease in invasive procedures, such as vaginal hysterectomy (25.1 % vs. 15.1 %, p < 0.01) and transabdominal hysterectomy (42.7 % vs 23.1 %, p < 0.01), alongside an increase in native tissue repairs like sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) (2.1 % vs. 27.5 %, p < 0.01), anterior colporrhaphy (14.6 % vs. 24.7 %, p < 0.01), and posterior colporrhaphy (0.0 % vs. 2.4 %, p = 0.02), was noted. Additionally, the use of vaginal mesh decreased (4.2 % vs. 1.2 %, p = 0.04). Short-term complications significantly declined, including infection rate (10.9 % vs. 4.4 %, p < 0.01), post-operative antibiotics (10.9 % vs. 4.0 %, p < 0.01) and need for blood transfusion (16.7 % vs. 7.6 %, p < 0.01). SSLF was an independent protective factor against short-term complications (OR = 0.191, CI 0.044–0.826, p = 0.027), adjusted for year and patient age.

Conclusion

Our analysis suggests a shift toward less invasive POP surgeries, potentially contributing to improved short-term outcomes. The increase in native tissue repairs and reduction in hysterectomies may be associated with fewer short-term complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆腔器官脱垂修复中患者特征、手术技术和相关并发症的趋势
目的探讨近十年来盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术修复方法的发展趋势和患者特点,重点分析围术期和术后并发症。方法回顾性队列研究分析2014 - 2022年某三级医疗中心18岁以上女性POP手术及短期并发症。排除标准包括盆腔放疗、恶性肿瘤、显著合并症、记录不完整或随访缺失。采用Clavien-Dindo分类评估并发症,重点关注感染率、抗生素使用、输血、30天内再入院和重症监护病房入住情况。进行单因素分析和逻辑回归。该研究包括490名女性,2014年为239人,2022年为251人。侵入性手术的减少,如阴道子宫切除术(25.1%比15.1%,p <;0.01)和经腹子宫切除术(42.7% vs 23.1%, p <;0.01),同时骶棘韧带固定(SSLF)等天然组织修复增加(2.1%比27.5%,p <;0.01),前阴道破裂(14.6% vs. 24.7%, p <;0.01)和后阴道破裂(0.0% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.02)。此外,阴道网片的使用减少(4.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.04)。短期并发症显著降低,包括感染率(10.9% vs. 4.4%, p <;0.01),术后抗生素(10.9% vs. 4.0%, p <;0.01)和输血需求(16.7%对7.6%,p <;0.01)。经年份和患者年龄调整后,SSLF是预防短期并发症的独立保护因素(OR = 0.191, CI 0.044-0.826, p = 0.027)。结论:我们的分析表明,微创POP手术可能有助于改善短期预后。自然组织修复的增加和子宫切除术的减少可能与更少的短期并发症有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Home-telemonitoring of fetal and maternal condition in complicated pregnancies: Results from a real-world cohort to understand unplanned hospital visits and re-admissions The safety of vaginal delivery following obstetric anal sphincter injury- A retrospective pilot study using transperineal ultrasound algorithm Association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term risk of cardiomyopathy: a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis Pretreatment decrease of the anti-müllerian hormone level does not translate into the proportionally lower efficiency of ovarian stimulation in patients with haematological malignancies A pre-post prospective study on the use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) unit in the management of endometriosis pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1