Louise Deboeuf, Maximilien Riche, Henri Malaizé, Pauline Marijon, Karima Mokhtari, Franck Bielle, Suzanne Tran, Lucia Nichelli, Julian Jacob, Mehdi Touat, Khê Hoang-Xuan, Caroline Houillier, Florence Laigle-Donadey, David Reinecke, Maximilian I Ruge, Ahmed Idbaih, Bertrand Mathon
{"title":"Safety and therapeutic impact of stereotactic biopsy in very elderly patients with brain tumors.","authors":"Louise Deboeuf, Maximilien Riche, Henri Malaizé, Pauline Marijon, Karima Mokhtari, Franck Bielle, Suzanne Tran, Lucia Nichelli, Julian Jacob, Mehdi Touat, Khê Hoang-Xuan, Caroline Houillier, Florence Laigle-Donadey, David Reinecke, Maximilian I Ruge, Ahmed Idbaih, Bertrand Mathon","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS241948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a lack of data regarding the benefit-risk ratio and therapeutic value of brain biopsy in very elderly patients with brain tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of stereotactic biopsy in patients aged ≥ 80 years and assess the impact of the procedure on subsequent therapeutic management and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients aged ≥ 80 years who underwent stereotactic biopsy for a newly diagnosed intracerebral tumor during a 15-year period at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the period, 2350 stereotactic brain biopsies were performed, with 209 biopsies (8.9%) in 208 patients aged ≥ 80 years. Histological diagnosis was obtained in 96.2% of cases. Biopsy results differed from the suspected diagnosis in 23 patients (11.1%). After biopsy, 1.9% of the patients experienced persistent neurological deficit. After histopathological diagnosis, 80.7% of the cases received adjuvant treatment. Only a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥ 70% was a significant predictor of receiving complete adjuvant treatment (OR 24.3, 95% CI 7.0-84.1; p < 0.001). The median OS from biopsy was 5.6 months (IQR 2.4-13.5 months). Grade 4 glioma, KPS score < 70%, and tumor contrast enhancement on MRI predicted a shorter OS. Receiving complete first-line adjuvant therapy predicted a longer OS. In patients with grade 4 glioma, those exhibiting a methylated O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter demonstrated significantly prolonged survival compared with patients with an unmethylated MGMT promoter (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stereotactic biopsy for very elderly patients with brain tumors has a high diagnostic yield and a favorable safety profile, ultimately impacting patients' therapeutic management and OS. Nonetheless, it is crucial to consider the patient's prebiopsy condition. Specifically, a KPS score ≥ 70% was identified as a key factor in the decision-making process for biopsy in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"194-203"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS241948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: There is a lack of data regarding the benefit-risk ratio and therapeutic value of brain biopsy in very elderly patients with brain tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of stereotactic biopsy in patients aged ≥ 80 years and assess the impact of the procedure on subsequent therapeutic management and overall survival (OS).
Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients aged ≥ 80 years who underwent stereotactic biopsy for a newly diagnosed intracerebral tumor during a 15-year period at a single institution.
Results: During the period, 2350 stereotactic brain biopsies were performed, with 209 biopsies (8.9%) in 208 patients aged ≥ 80 years. Histological diagnosis was obtained in 96.2% of cases. Biopsy results differed from the suspected diagnosis in 23 patients (11.1%). After biopsy, 1.9% of the patients experienced persistent neurological deficit. After histopathological diagnosis, 80.7% of the cases received adjuvant treatment. Only a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥ 70% was a significant predictor of receiving complete adjuvant treatment (OR 24.3, 95% CI 7.0-84.1; p < 0.001). The median OS from biopsy was 5.6 months (IQR 2.4-13.5 months). Grade 4 glioma, KPS score < 70%, and tumor contrast enhancement on MRI predicted a shorter OS. Receiving complete first-line adjuvant therapy predicted a longer OS. In patients with grade 4 glioma, those exhibiting a methylated O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter demonstrated significantly prolonged survival compared with patients with an unmethylated MGMT promoter (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Stereotactic biopsy for very elderly patients with brain tumors has a high diagnostic yield and a favorable safety profile, ultimately impacting patients' therapeutic management and OS. Nonetheless, it is crucial to consider the patient's prebiopsy condition. Specifically, a KPS score ≥ 70% was identified as a key factor in the decision-making process for biopsy in this population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.