Stigma Regarding Electroconvulsive Therapy Among Healthcare Professionals.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Ect Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000001128
Òscar Alcoverro-Fortuny, Susana Lira Rueda, Mikel Esnaola, Ferran Viñas Usan, Sandra Fernández Núñez
{"title":"Stigma Regarding Electroconvulsive Therapy Among Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Òscar Alcoverro-Fortuny, Susana Lira Rueda, Mikel Esnaola, Ferran Viñas Usan, Sandra Fernández Núñez","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000001128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The stigma surrounding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) among healthcare professionals can lead to a lack of training, limit accessibility to treatment, and introduce variability in its application. The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and knowledge regarding ECT within healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 215 professionals from the Vallès Oriental region (Barcelona) completed the translated version of the Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT (QuAKE). The relationship between attitude and knowledge scores was analyzed in relation to several demographic variables with bivariate descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The characteristics associated with a more unfavorable attitude and lower knowledge were being a female professional, aged under 30 years or over 50 years, belonging to the nursing assistant group, working in a setting not related to mental health, and never having witnessed an ECT session. A positive correlation was observed between attitude and knowledge about ECT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified nursing assistants as the group with the most unfavorable attitudes and lowest knowledge about ECT, and the social workers group had a favorable attitude despite having limited knowledge. The correlation between knowledge and attitude suggests the possibility of improving the latter through appropriate training, although these aspects are not always affected in the same way in all professional groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":"42-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000001128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The stigma surrounding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) among healthcare professionals can lead to a lack of training, limit accessibility to treatment, and introduce variability in its application. The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and knowledge regarding ECT within healthcare professionals.

Methods: A total of 215 professionals from the Vallès Oriental region (Barcelona) completed the translated version of the Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT (QuAKE). The relationship between attitude and knowledge scores was analyzed in relation to several demographic variables with bivariate descriptive statistics.

Results: The characteristics associated with a more unfavorable attitude and lower knowledge were being a female professional, aged under 30 years or over 50 years, belonging to the nursing assistant group, working in a setting not related to mental health, and never having witnessed an ECT session. A positive correlation was observed between attitude and knowledge about ECT.

Conclusions: This study identified nursing assistants as the group with the most unfavorable attitudes and lowest knowledge about ECT, and the social workers group had a favorable attitude despite having limited knowledge. The correlation between knowledge and attitude suggests the possibility of improving the latter through appropriate training, although these aspects are not always affected in the same way in all professional groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员对电休克治疗的耻辱感。
目的:医疗保健专业人员对电痉挛治疗(ECT)的耻辱感可能导致缺乏培训,限制了治疗的可及性,并在其应用中引入了可变性。本研究的目的是探讨医疗专业人员对电痉挛治疗的态度和知识。方法:来自巴塞隆纳东方区的215名专业人员完成了《ECT态度与知识问卷》(QuAKE)的翻译。用双变量描述性统计分析了态度与知识得分之间的关系。结果:女性专业人员、年龄在30岁以下或50岁以上、属于护理助理组、工作环境与心理健康无关、从未见过电休克治疗等特征与不良态度和低知识相关。态度与电痉挛知识呈正相关。结论:本研究发现护理员对电休克疗法的态度最不利、知识最低;社工对电休克疗法的了解有限,但态度较好。知识和态度之间的相互关系表明有可能通过适当的培训来改善态度,尽管这些方面在所有专业群体中并不总是受到同样的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
期刊最新文献
Practical Steps: Using Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Catatonia. Electroconvulsive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Poststroke Depression Following Flow Diversion-Related In-Stent Thrombosis. Variability in Real-World Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Practice: Is Perfection the Enemy of the Good? Rethinking Seizure Termination: A Possible Paradigm Shift in Understanding a Primary Mechanism of ECT. Electroconvulsive Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1