Exploring the Extent and Depth of Clinical Education on Sepsis SEP-1 Core Measure and the Reported Impact on Outcomes and Compliance rate: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001215
Alexis J Wells, Alysha Sapp, Danielle K Walker, Kathy A Baker
{"title":"Exploring the Extent and Depth of Clinical Education on Sepsis SEP-1 Core Measure and the Reported Impact on Outcomes and Compliance rate: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Alexis J Wells, Alysha Sapp, Danielle K Walker, Kathy A Baker","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to understand the extent and depth of education provided on the severe sepsis and septic shock management bundle quality measure (SEP-1) to frontline clinicians to elicit insight regarding the impact on patient outcomes, the compliance rate, and any efforts to alleviate concerns about clinical judgment challenges with SEP-1.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Seven databases were used: ProQuest, EBSCO Host, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL for studies published in 2015 and later using key terms related to sepsis and SEP-1 quality measure.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Two independent reviewers selected studies that mentioned the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services SEP-1 and included education to frontline clinicians on the quality measure as one of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data extraction included study design, publication type, what was educated to frontline clinicians, Bennet and Bennet's \"depth of knowledge\" through education provided, and any mention of patient outcomes and change in SEP-1 compliance rate from the study.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>The initial search yielded 493 articles. After screening for eligibility criteria, 20 studies were ultimately included. When evaluating what details of SEP-1 are being educated, 95% (19/20) of the studies focused on how to identify sepsis as well as the bundle elements required to pass the measure (19/20); however, the deeper details of the measure that allow clinical judgment and still pass the measure are severely lacking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple education opportunities not currently addressed in the literature may lead to improvement of the national SEP-1 compliance rate and alleviate clinician concern that the quality measure does not allow for clinical judgment. Without deeper education, this knowledge gap could be a key factor in why the quality measure national compliance rate has halted, raising calls to retire the measure prematurely.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 3","pages":"e1215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This scoping review aimed to understand the extent and depth of education provided on the severe sepsis and septic shock management bundle quality measure (SEP-1) to frontline clinicians to elicit insight regarding the impact on patient outcomes, the compliance rate, and any efforts to alleviate concerns about clinical judgment challenges with SEP-1.

Data sources: Seven databases were used: ProQuest, EBSCO Host, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL for studies published in 2015 and later using key terms related to sepsis and SEP-1 quality measure.

Study selection: Two independent reviewers selected studies that mentioned the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services SEP-1 and included education to frontline clinicians on the quality measure as one of the interventions.

Data extraction: Data extraction included study design, publication type, what was educated to frontline clinicians, Bennet and Bennet's "depth of knowledge" through education provided, and any mention of patient outcomes and change in SEP-1 compliance rate from the study.

Data synthesis: The initial search yielded 493 articles. After screening for eligibility criteria, 20 studies were ultimately included. When evaluating what details of SEP-1 are being educated, 95% (19/20) of the studies focused on how to identify sepsis as well as the bundle elements required to pass the measure (19/20); however, the deeper details of the measure that allow clinical judgment and still pass the measure are severely lacking.

Conclusions: Multiple education opportunities not currently addressed in the literature may lead to improvement of the national SEP-1 compliance rate and alleviate clinician concern that the quality measure does not allow for clinical judgment. Without deeper education, this knowledge gap could be a key factor in why the quality measure national compliance rate has halted, raising calls to retire the measure prematurely.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨脓毒症SEP-1核心指标临床教育的广度和深度及其对结果和依从率的影响:一项范围综述
目的:本次范围界定审查旨在了解向一线临床医生提供的有关严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理捆绑质量措施(SEP-1)教育的广度和深度,以深入了解对患者预后的影响、依从率,以及为缓解对 SEP-1 临床判断挑战的担忧所做的努力:使用了七个数据库:数据来源:使用了七个数据库:ProQuest、EBSCO Host、Embase、Web of Science、PubMed、MEDLINE 和 CINAHL,使用脓毒症和 SEP-1 质量测量相关的关键术语检索 2015 年及以后发表的研究:两名独立审稿人选择了提及美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心 SEP-1 并将对一线临床医生进行有关该质量标准的教育作为干预措施之一的研究:数据提取包括研究设计、出版物类型、对一线临床医生的教育内容、Bennet 和 Bennet 通过教育提供的 "知识深度",以及研究中提及的患者治疗效果和 SEP-1 达标率的变化:初步检索共获得 493 篇文章。经过资格标准筛选,最终纳入了 20 项研究。在评估 SEP-1 的教育细节时,95%(19/20)的研究侧重于如何识别败血症以及通过测量所需的捆绑要素(19/20);然而,严重缺乏允许临床判断并仍能通过测量的测量深层细节:结论:文献中目前未涉及的多种教育机会可能会提高全国 SEP-1 的达标率,并减轻临床医生对该质量标准不允许临床判断的担忧。如果没有更深入的教育,这种知识差距可能是导致全国质量测量达标率停滞不前的一个关键因素,从而引发提前退出该测量的呼声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ketamine for Severe Asthma Exacerbation. Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health in PICU Mode of Death: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Clinicians' Perspectives on Strengthening Interprofessional Teamwork to Support Surrogate Decision-Makers of Critically Ill Patients in ICUs. Development and Validation of the Family ICU Delirium Detection Instrument. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Concomitant Polyradiculoneuritis and Myocarditis With Positive Anti-Titin Antibodies: A Case Report and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1