{"title":"A Content Analysis of how Biology Textbook Tasks Address System Thinking Skills in the Context of the Carbon Cycle","authors":"Katharina Düsing","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10231-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the global cycling of carbon is critical to participate in the current public discussion on climate change in an informed manner. Fostering system thinking is key to reach this goal. Of the various influences on students’ development of system thinking in relation to the carbon cycle, the present study focuses on the influence of textbooks – both their explanatory texts and the activities they provide for students. Research-based information pertaining to ways students work on acquiring system thinking skills when solving textbook tasks on the carbon cycle is scarce. Therefore, this study investigates two research questions: (1) Which system thinking skills are addressed in German biology textbook tasks on the carbon cycle? and (2) Which entities and activities from different levels of biological organization do students deal with when working on the tasks? The second research question relates to the argument that the multi-level character of the carbon cycle causes particular learning difficulties for students. Following a qualitative content analysis, two coding schemes are developed and applied. The main results: the system thinking skills “identifying system organization” and “analyzing system behavior” are more frequently addressed than “system modeling”. The selection of entities and activities of the carbon cycle in the tasks depicts a variety of individual aspects but often does not allow a continuous tracing of dynamics in the carbon cycle along carbon flows. We suggest a greater emphasis on systems modeling in carbon cycle tasks and that the selection of entities and activities should support knowledge integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10231-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the global cycling of carbon is critical to participate in the current public discussion on climate change in an informed manner. Fostering system thinking is key to reach this goal. Of the various influences on students’ development of system thinking in relation to the carbon cycle, the present study focuses on the influence of textbooks – both their explanatory texts and the activities they provide for students. Research-based information pertaining to ways students work on acquiring system thinking skills when solving textbook tasks on the carbon cycle is scarce. Therefore, this study investigates two research questions: (1) Which system thinking skills are addressed in German biology textbook tasks on the carbon cycle? and (2) Which entities and activities from different levels of biological organization do students deal with when working on the tasks? The second research question relates to the argument that the multi-level character of the carbon cycle causes particular learning difficulties for students. Following a qualitative content analysis, two coding schemes are developed and applied. The main results: the system thinking skills “identifying system organization” and “analyzing system behavior” are more frequently addressed than “system modeling”. The selection of entities and activities of the carbon cycle in the tasks depicts a variety of individual aspects but often does not allow a continuous tracing of dynamics in the carbon cycle along carbon flows. We suggest a greater emphasis on systems modeling in carbon cycle tasks and that the selection of entities and activities should support knowledge integration.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.