A Content Analysis of how Biology Textbook Tasks Address System Thinking Skills in the Context of the Carbon Cycle

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Science Education Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s11165-025-10231-7
Katharina Düsing
{"title":"A Content Analysis of how Biology Textbook Tasks Address System Thinking Skills in the Context of the Carbon Cycle","authors":"Katharina Düsing","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10231-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the global cycling of carbon is critical to participate in the current public discussion on climate change in an informed manner. Fostering system thinking is key to reach this goal. Of the various influences on students’ development of system thinking in relation to the carbon cycle, the present study focuses on the influence of textbooks – both their explanatory texts and the activities they provide for students. Research-based information pertaining to ways students work on acquiring system thinking skills when solving textbook tasks on the carbon cycle is scarce. Therefore, this study investigates two research questions: (1) Which system thinking skills are addressed in German biology textbook tasks on the carbon cycle? and (2) Which entities and activities from different levels of biological organization do students deal with when working on the tasks? The second research question relates to the argument that the multi-level character of the carbon cycle causes particular learning difficulties for students. Following a qualitative content analysis, two coding schemes are developed and applied. The main results: the system thinking skills “identifying system organization” and “analyzing system behavior” are more frequently addressed than “system modeling”. The selection of entities and activities of the carbon cycle in the tasks depicts a variety of individual aspects but often does not allow a continuous tracing of dynamics in the carbon cycle along carbon flows. We suggest a greater emphasis on systems modeling in carbon cycle tasks and that the selection of entities and activities should support knowledge integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10231-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the global cycling of carbon is critical to participate in the current public discussion on climate change in an informed manner. Fostering system thinking is key to reach this goal. Of the various influences on students’ development of system thinking in relation to the carbon cycle, the present study focuses on the influence of textbooks – both their explanatory texts and the activities they provide for students. Research-based information pertaining to ways students work on acquiring system thinking skills when solving textbook tasks on the carbon cycle is scarce. Therefore, this study investigates two research questions: (1) Which system thinking skills are addressed in German biology textbook tasks on the carbon cycle? and (2) Which entities and activities from different levels of biological organization do students deal with when working on the tasks? The second research question relates to the argument that the multi-level character of the carbon cycle causes particular learning difficulties for students. Following a qualitative content analysis, two coding schemes are developed and applied. The main results: the system thinking skills “identifying system organization” and “analyzing system behavior” are more frequently addressed than “system modeling”. The selection of entities and activities of the carbon cycle in the tasks depicts a variety of individual aspects but often does not allow a continuous tracing of dynamics in the carbon cycle along carbon flows. We suggest a greater emphasis on systems modeling in carbon cycle tasks and that the selection of entities and activities should support knowledge integration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物课本任务如何在碳循环背景下解决系统思考技能的内容分析
了解碳的全球循环对于以知情的方式参与当前有关气候变化的公众讨论至关重要。培养系统思维是实现这一目标的关键。在影响学生发展与碳循环有关的系统思维的各种因素中,本研究侧重于教科书的影响--包括教科书的说明性文字和教科书为学生提供的活动。有关学生在解决课本中有关碳循环的任务时如何习得系统思维能力的研究资料很少。因此,本研究探讨了两个研究问题:(1) 德国生物教科书中关于碳循环的任务涉及哪些系统思维技能? (2) 学生在完成任务时,要处理生物组织不同层次的哪些实体和活动?第二个研究问题与碳循环的多层次性给学生造成特殊学习困难这一论点有关。在对内容进行定性分析后,制定并应用了两个编码方案。主要结果是:系统思维能力 "识别系统组织 "和 "分析系统行为 "比 "系统建模 "更常涉及。任务中对碳循环实体和活动的选择描绘了各个不同的方面,但往往无法沿着碳流连续追踪碳循环的动态。我们建议在碳循环任务中更加强调系统建模,实体和活动的选择应支持知识整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
期刊最新文献
Preservice Science Teachers’ Notice and Response To Students’ Scientific Thinking Within Elementary Science Methods Course Does Topic Matter? Investigating Students’ Interest, Emotions and Learning when Writing Stories About Socioscientific Issues Effects of Interventions on Science Vocabulary and Content Knowledge: A Meta-analysis Teaching Experiences Connected To The Implementation Of Inquiry-Based Practical Work In Primary Science Classrooms A Content Analysis of how Biology Textbook Tasks Address System Thinking Skills in the Context of the Carbon Cycle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1