The role of strain wave elastography in the evaluation of renal fibrosis in patients with kidney diseases

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Nefrologia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nefro.2024.10.007
Hanaa Ibrahim Okda , Rabab Alaa Eldin Keshk , Noha El-Anwar , Ahmed Mohammed El Behiry , Sally Maher Gamaleldin
{"title":"The role of strain wave elastography in the evaluation of renal fibrosis in patients with kidney diseases","authors":"Hanaa Ibrahim Okda ,&nbsp;Rabab Alaa Eldin Keshk ,&nbsp;Noha El-Anwar ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mohammed El Behiry ,&nbsp;Sally Maher Gamaleldin","doi":"10.1016/j.nefro.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A renal biopsy represents the gold standard in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of patients with chronic kidney disease and glomerulonephritis. Strain wave elastography (SE) is a developing technique to assess tissue elasticity. The aim of this study was to correlate between the strain index value of renal parenchyma and degree of renal fibrosis detected with renal biopsy.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>For 68 patients who were referred for a kidney biopsy, SE test was performed. The Banff scoring system was utilized to classify the IFTA grading of kidney fibrosis that assigns a severity level of mild, moderate, or severe. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was utilized to correlate between the severity of renal fibrosis and the grade of renal elasticity determined by SE.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 38 males and 30 females, the echogenicity, qualitative and semiquantitative elastography showed significant positive correlation with serum creatinine, percentage of fibrosis, <em>G</em> score and tubular atrophy and significant negative correlation with eGFR. ROC curve of SE for diagnosis of interstitial fibrosis shown that echogenicity has sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 62.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) 75.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100.0% with area under curve (AUC) 0.906, while qualitative elastography has sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 75.0%, PPV 77.8%, NPV 75.0%, AUC 0.833, semi quantitative elastography has sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 93.8%, PPV 93.8%, NPV 83.3% with AUC 0.915.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SE approach is simple to use, and can differentiate between varying stages of renal fibrosis. However, further research is required before it can be frequently used in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18997,"journal":{"name":"Nefrologia","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 259-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0211699524001085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A renal biopsy represents the gold standard in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of patients with chronic kidney disease and glomerulonephritis. Strain wave elastography (SE) is a developing technique to assess tissue elasticity. The aim of this study was to correlate between the strain index value of renal parenchyma and degree of renal fibrosis detected with renal biopsy.

Method

For 68 patients who were referred for a kidney biopsy, SE test was performed. The Banff scoring system was utilized to classify the IFTA grading of kidney fibrosis that assigns a severity level of mild, moderate, or severe. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was utilized to correlate between the severity of renal fibrosis and the grade of renal elasticity determined by SE.

Results

In total, 38 males and 30 females, the echogenicity, qualitative and semiquantitative elastography showed significant positive correlation with serum creatinine, percentage of fibrosis, G score and tubular atrophy and significant negative correlation with eGFR. ROC curve of SE for diagnosis of interstitial fibrosis shown that echogenicity has sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 62.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) 75.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100.0% with area under curve (AUC) 0.906, while qualitative elastography has sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 75.0%, PPV 77.8%, NPV 75.0%, AUC 0.833, semi quantitative elastography has sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 93.8%, PPV 93.8%, NPV 83.3% with AUC 0.915.

Conclusion

SE approach is simple to use, and can differentiate between varying stages of renal fibrosis. However, further research is required before it can be frequently used in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nefrologia
Nefrologia 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Nefrología is the official publication of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. The Journal publishes articles on basic or clinical research relating to nephrology, arterial hypertension, dialysis and kidney transplants. It is governed by the peer review system and all original papers are subject to internal assessment and external reviews. The journal accepts submissions of articles in English and in Spanish languages.
期刊最新文献
Escombroidosis y bacteriemia por Raoultella ornithinolytica en paciente trasplantado renal: a propósito de un caso Concurrent extramedullary hematopoiesis and AA amyloidosis in the kidney Twister® en el manejo aséptico de catéteres permanentes en hemodiálisis Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with unexplained renal impairment: A single center study The role of strain wave elastography in the evaluation of renal fibrosis in patients with kidney diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1