Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 16 or more brain metastases: Retrospective single-institution analysis

IF 2 Q1 Medicine World Neurosurgery: X Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.wnsx.2025.100432
Michael T. Milano , Sara Hardy , Dandan Zhang , Terris Igwe , Daniel Huang , Amit K. Chowdhry , Jihyung Yoon , Tyler M. Schmidt , Kevin A. Walter , Hyunuk Jung , Yuwei Zhou , Kenneth Y. Usuki
{"title":"Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 16 or more brain metastases: Retrospective single-institution analysis","authors":"Michael T. Milano ,&nbsp;Sara Hardy ,&nbsp;Dandan Zhang ,&nbsp;Terris Igwe ,&nbsp;Daniel Huang ,&nbsp;Amit K. Chowdhry ,&nbsp;Jihyung Yoon ,&nbsp;Tyler M. Schmidt ,&nbsp;Kevin A. Walter ,&nbsp;Hyunuk Jung ,&nbsp;Yuwei Zhou ,&nbsp;Kenneth Y. Usuki","doi":"10.1016/j.wnsx.2025.100432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to report outcomes of patients treated with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone (in one course) for 16+ brain metastases, without prior or planned whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified 29 eligible patients treated from 2019 to 2024, and retrospectively analyzed overall survival (OS) and cancer control outcomes. Twenty-eight underwent 3-fraction SRS (mostly 8–9 Gy per fraction), and 1 underwent single-fraction SRS (20 Gy).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Primary cancers included non-small cell lung (<em>n</em> = 14), breast (<em>n</em> = 5) and kidney (<em>n</em> = 1) cancers, and melanoma (<em>n</em> = 9). For those who had undergone prior SRS for &lt;16 brain metastases (<em>n</em> = 9) versus those with newly diagnosed brain metastases (<em>n</em> = 20): 16–39 (median = 22) vs 16–41 (median = 26) brain metastases were treated; net lesion volumes were 0.2–10.0 (median = 2.0) vs 1.3–58.8 (median = 5.8) cc (<em>p</em> = 0.050); median OS was 19.8 vs 6.0 months (<em>p</em> = 0.47). Among all 29 patients, 10 underwent a second SRS for local recurrence (<em>n</em> = 2), new metastases (<em>n</em> = 7) or both (<em>n</em> = 1). Two underwent salvage WBRT, 1 received systemic therapy in lieu of WBRT and 4 developed intracranial disease progression not amenable to SRS (along with extracranial progression in 3) for whom WBRT was not consistent with their goals of care. One patient developed hemorrhagic transformation of a metastasis; no others experienced grade ≥3 late toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SRS-alone for 16+ brain metastases is well-tolerated in patients who, in general, experience poor OS. A multitude of factors confound assessment of potentially prognostic factors in our series. More study of SRS-alone for high-number multiple brain metastases is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37134,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery: X","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590139725000067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We sought to report outcomes of patients treated with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone (in one course) for 16+ brain metastases, without prior or planned whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

Methods

We identified 29 eligible patients treated from 2019 to 2024, and retrospectively analyzed overall survival (OS) and cancer control outcomes. Twenty-eight underwent 3-fraction SRS (mostly 8–9 Gy per fraction), and 1 underwent single-fraction SRS (20 Gy).

Results

Primary cancers included non-small cell lung (n = 14), breast (n = 5) and kidney (n = 1) cancers, and melanoma (n = 9). For those who had undergone prior SRS for <16 brain metastases (n = 9) versus those with newly diagnosed brain metastases (n = 20): 16–39 (median = 22) vs 16–41 (median = 26) brain metastases were treated; net lesion volumes were 0.2–10.0 (median = 2.0) vs 1.3–58.8 (median = 5.8) cc (p = 0.050); median OS was 19.8 vs 6.0 months (p = 0.47). Among all 29 patients, 10 underwent a second SRS for local recurrence (n = 2), new metastases (n = 7) or both (n = 1). Two underwent salvage WBRT, 1 received systemic therapy in lieu of WBRT and 4 developed intracranial disease progression not amenable to SRS (along with extracranial progression in 3) for whom WBRT was not consistent with their goals of care. One patient developed hemorrhagic transformation of a metastasis; no others experienced grade ≥3 late toxicity.

Conclusions

SRS-alone for 16+ brain metastases is well-tolerated in patients who, in general, experience poor OS. A multitude of factors confound assessment of potentially prognostic factors in our series. More study of SRS-alone for high-number multiple brain metastases is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向放射手术治疗16个或更多脑转移患者:回顾性单机构分析
目的:我们试图报道16+脑转移患者在没有事先或计划的全脑放疗(WBRT)的情况下,单独接受基于线性加速器的立体定向放射手术(SRS)(一个疗程)治疗的结果。方法选取2019年至2024年接受治疗的29例符合条件的患者,回顾性分析总生存期(OS)和癌症控制结果。28人接受3段SRS(大部分为8-9 Gy /段),1人接受单段SRS (20 Gy /段)。结果原发性肿瘤包括非小细胞肺癌(n = 14)、乳腺癌(n = 5)、肾癌(n = 1)和黑色素瘤(n = 9)。在既往接受SRS治疗的16例脑转移瘤患者(n = 9)和新诊断的脑转移瘤患者(n = 20)中:16 - 39例(中位= 22)vs 16 - 41例(中位= 26)脑转移瘤得到治疗;净病变体积分别为0.2-10.0(中位数= 2.0)和1.3-58.8(中位数= 5.8)cc (p = 0.050);中位OS为19.8 vs 6.0个月(p = 0.47)。在所有29例患者中,10例因局部复发(n = 2)、新转移(n = 7)或两者均接受了第二次SRS (n = 1)。2例接受了补救性WBRT, 1例接受了全身治疗代替WBRT, 4例出现了不适合SRS的颅内疾病进展(3例伴有颅外进展),其中WBRT与他们的护理目标不一致。一名患者出现了转移的出血性转化;没有其他患者出现≥3级晚期毒性。结论单纯使用ssrs治疗16+脑转移瘤,对于一般OS较差的患者耐受性良好。在我们的研究中,许多因素混淆了对潜在预后因素的评估。更多的研究单独使用srs治疗大量多发脑转移瘤是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Neurosurgery: X
World Neurosurgery: X Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
44 days
期刊最新文献
Gut–brain axis in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease: Emerging clinical and therapeutic implications Revisiting decompressive craniectomy thresholds in traumatic brain injury: Are we operating too early or too late? Vascular loops and pulsatile tinnitus: Culprit or innocent bystander? – An illustrative case and systematic literature review Artificial intelligence–enhanced neuronavigation: Clinical applications and current limitations in neurosurgery Analysis of risk factors for planned tracheal extubation failure in patients after posterior fossa surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1