What lies beneath: A qualitative review of misinformation on vulval lichen sclerosus

IF 0.5 JEADV clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1002/jvc2.561
Yixuan Goh, Cathal O'Connor, Michelle Murphy
{"title":"What lies beneath: A qualitative review of misinformation on vulval lichen sclerosus","authors":"Yixuan Goh,&nbsp;Cathal O'Connor,&nbsp;Michelle Murphy","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that most commonly affects the vulva and can significantly affect quality of life. While websites and social media can offer helpful information, there is little known about the content of misinformation on LS online.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to qualitatively assess the content of misinformation surrounding vulval LS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed misinformation related to LS on the internet through a search on PubMed, Google and various social media platforms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The key themes of misinformation included incorrect causes of LS such as gut dysbiosis and infections; fake ‘cures’ for LS such as elimination diets, homeopathic remedies, Borax, or unproven ‘ground-breaking’ procedures like lasers and plasma-rich protein injections; and criticism of topical corticosteroids and exaggeration of potential side-effects, despite corticosteroids being the gold-standard treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Dermatologists, gynecologists and general practitioners should be aware of these misleading claims, be prepared to refute them, and steer patients to reliable sources of information and evidence based therapies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"352-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.561","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that most commonly affects the vulva and can significantly affect quality of life. While websites and social media can offer helpful information, there is little known about the content of misinformation on LS online.

Objectives

This study aimed to qualitatively assess the content of misinformation surrounding vulval LS.

Methods

We reviewed misinformation related to LS on the internet through a search on PubMed, Google and various social media platforms.

Results

The key themes of misinformation included incorrect causes of LS such as gut dysbiosis and infections; fake ‘cures’ for LS such as elimination diets, homeopathic remedies, Borax, or unproven ‘ground-breaking’ procedures like lasers and plasma-rich protein injections; and criticism of topical corticosteroids and exaggeration of potential side-effects, despite corticosteroids being the gold-standard treatment.

Conclusions

Dermatologists, gynecologists and general practitioners should be aware of these misleading claims, be prepared to refute them, and steer patients to reliable sources of information and evidence based therapies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下面是什么:外阴硬化性地衣错误信息的定性回顾
背景:硬化地衣(LS)是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,最常见于外阴,并可显著影响生活质量。虽然网站和社交媒体可以提供有用的信息,但人们对LS在线错误信息的内容知之甚少。目的本研究旨在定性评估外阴LS周围错误信息的内容。方法通过检索PubMed、谷歌和各种社交媒体平台,对网络上与LS相关的错误信息进行梳理。结果错误信息的主要主题包括LS的病因不正确,如肠道生态失调和感染;治疗LS的假“疗法”,如消除饮食、顺势疗法、硼砂,或未经证实的“突破性”手术,如激光和富含血浆的蛋白质注射;尽管皮质类固醇是治疗的黄金标准,但对局部皮质类固醇的批评和对潜在副作用的夸大。结论皮肤科医生、妇科医生和全科医生应该意识到这些误导性的说法,准备驳斥它们,并引导患者获得可靠的信息来源和基于证据的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Moving Beyond Acne and Rosacea: A New Perspective on Pustular Folliculitis of Face and Neck Skin Self-Examination in High-Risk Individuals: Knowledge Is Not Enough Editor's Picks Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1