The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ: development, validation, and estimated outcomes of the SimDCIS model.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07639-0
Keris Poelhekken, Monique D Dorrius, Amanda Dibden, Stephen W Duffy, Bert van der Vegt, Geertruida H de Bock, Marcel J W Greuter
{"title":"The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ: development, validation, and estimated outcomes of the SimDCIS model.","authors":"Keris Poelhekken, Monique D Dorrius, Amanda Dibden, Stephen W Duffy, Bert van der Vegt, Geertruida H de Bock, Marcel J W Greuter","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07639-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a novel simulation model for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), fully validate it, and provide new estimates for DCIS in the setting of population-based biennial screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A micro-simulation Markov model for DCIS (SimDCIS) was developed. Input parameters were independently derived from the literature and transition parameters were age- and grade-dependent. The model was applied to the Dutch biennial screening program. SimDCIS was internally, cross, and externally validated by comparison of the model output to data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, a modelling study on the United Kingdom Frequency Trial, and the United Kingdom screening program, respectively. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate uncertainty. DCIS regression, progression to invasive breast cancer (IBC), clinical detection, and screen-detection were estimated in Dutch screening setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SimDCIS matched observed data in internal, external, and cross-validation. The model was most sensitive to DCIS onset probability, and the maximum variation in screen-detection rate was 11%. In Dutch screening setting, DCIS regression, progression to IBC, clinical detection, and screen-detection were estimated at 8% (0-14%), 19% (16-24%), 8% (0-13%), and 61% (56-65%), respectively. Grade distribution was 20% grade 1, 38% grade 2, and 42% grade 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SimDCIS provides strong accuracy across validation methods and is particularly sensitive to DCIS onset probability. Most DCIS will be found through screening, of which less than 50% of DCIS will be grade 3, less than 1 in 10 will regress, and 1 out of 5 DCIS will progress to IBC in biennial screening setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"223-231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07639-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a novel simulation model for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), fully validate it, and provide new estimates for DCIS in the setting of population-based biennial screening.

Methods: A micro-simulation Markov model for DCIS (SimDCIS) was developed. Input parameters were independently derived from the literature and transition parameters were age- and grade-dependent. The model was applied to the Dutch biennial screening program. SimDCIS was internally, cross, and externally validated by comparison of the model output to data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, a modelling study on the United Kingdom Frequency Trial, and the United Kingdom screening program, respectively. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate uncertainty. DCIS regression, progression to invasive breast cancer (IBC), clinical detection, and screen-detection were estimated in Dutch screening setting.

Results: SimDCIS matched observed data in internal, external, and cross-validation. The model was most sensitive to DCIS onset probability, and the maximum variation in screen-detection rate was 11%. In Dutch screening setting, DCIS regression, progression to IBC, clinical detection, and screen-detection were estimated at 8% (0-14%), 19% (16-24%), 8% (0-13%), and 61% (56-65%), respectively. Grade distribution was 20% grade 1, 38% grade 2, and 42% grade 3.

Conclusion: SimDCIS provides strong accuracy across validation methods and is particularly sensitive to DCIS onset probability. Most DCIS will be found through screening, of which less than 50% of DCIS will be grade 3, less than 1 in 10 will regress, and 1 out of 5 DCIS will progress to IBC in biennial screening setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管原位癌的自然历史:SimDCIS模型的发展、验证和估计结果。
目的:开发一种新型的导管原位癌(DCIS)模拟模型,对其进行全面验证,并为基于人群的两年一次的筛查提供新的 DCIS 估计值:方法:开发了 DCIS 的微模拟马尔可夫模型(SimDCIS)。输入参数独立来源于文献,过渡参数与年龄和等级相关。该模型适用于荷兰两年一次的筛查计划。通过将模型输出与荷兰癌症登记处的数据、英国频率试验的建模研究以及英国筛查计划进行比较,分别对 SimDCIS 进行了内部、交叉和外部验证。进行了单变量和概率敏感性分析,以估计不确定性。对荷兰筛查环境中的DCIS回归、进展为浸润性乳腺癌(IBC)、临床检测和筛查检测进行了估计:结果:SimDCIS 与内部、外部和交叉验证的观察数据相匹配。该模型对DCIS发病概率最为敏感,筛查发现率的最大变化为11%。在荷兰筛查环境中,DCIS 退化、进展为 IBC、临床检测和筛查检测率估计分别为 8% (0-14%)、19% (16-24%)、8% (0-13%) 和 61% (56-65%)。等级分布为 1 级 20%、2 级 38% 和 3 级 42%:SimDCIS在各种验证方法中都具有很高的准确性,而且对DCIS的发病概率特别敏感。在两年一次的筛查中,大多数 DCIS 将通过筛查发现,其中不到 50% 的 DCIS 为 3 级,不到十分之一的 DCIS 会退变,五分之一的 DCIS 会进展为 IBC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant capecitabine in women with triple-negative breast cancer with residual disease after carboplatin-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OPERA: a phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) versus intravenous paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Cost-effectiveness of DPYD genotyping prior to capecitabine administration for metastatic breast cancer. Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with metastatic breast cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Development and validation of a highly accurate multigene gene expression biomarker to predict chemotherapy response in primary triple-negative breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1