Trends of neonatal sepsis and its etiology at Hawassa, Ethiopia: a five year retrospective cross-sectional study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMC Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1186/s12887-025-05515-w
Musa Mohammed Ali, Gaurav Kwatra, Mulugeta Mengistu, Biniyam Kijineh, Techilew Hailemeriam, Endale Worku, Demissie Assegu Fenta, Tariku Lambiyo, Dawit Yihdego Reda, Tsegaye Alemayehu
{"title":"Trends of neonatal sepsis and its etiology at Hawassa, Ethiopia: a five year retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Musa Mohammed Ali, Gaurav Kwatra, Mulugeta Mengistu, Biniyam Kijineh, Techilew Hailemeriam, Endale Worku, Demissie Assegu Fenta, Tariku Lambiyo, Dawit Yihdego Reda, Tsegaye Alemayehu","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05515-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in low- income countries. Neonatal sepsis is classified as early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) and late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS). Etiologies responsible for EONS are mostly acquired vertically from the mother during or before birth with the possibility of prevention. The burden and etiology of neonatal sepsis is not uniform across the globe with huge disparities based on the income level of the countries. This study aimed to determine neonatal sepsis trends, prevalence, and etiologies at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialised Hospital (HUCSH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among newborns aged 0 to 90 days who were admitted to the HUCSH from January 2019 to July 2023. Patient-related information and the culture results were obtained from HUCSH microbiology laboratory registration book. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2364 newborns suspected of having sepsis, 56% (95% CI: 54-58%) had culture-confirmed sepsis. When excluding Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CONS), the prevalence of culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis was 36.9%. The highest numbers of culture-confirmed cases was observed in 2021. The predominant bacteria identified were Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CONS) (34.1%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.9%), and Enterococcus (10.6%). Among culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis, 59.9% and 40.1% of cases were EONS and LONS, respectively. Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus and Enterococcus were the major bacteria found in both EONS and LONS while. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the second most common bacteria among newborns with EONS following CONS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis was relatively high in the study area. Early-onset neonatal sepsis was consistently more prevalent than LONS. The predominant etiologies of neonatal sepsis excluding CONS were K. pneumoniae, Enterococcus, Enterobacter agglomerans, Acinetobacter species, and Staphylococcus aureus. Among newborns with EONS, the predominant bacteria were K. pneumoniae, Enterococcus, Enterobacter agglomerans, and Acinetobacter species.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05515-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in low- income countries. Neonatal sepsis is classified as early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) and late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS). Etiologies responsible for EONS are mostly acquired vertically from the mother during or before birth with the possibility of prevention. The burden and etiology of neonatal sepsis is not uniform across the globe with huge disparities based on the income level of the countries. This study aimed to determine neonatal sepsis trends, prevalence, and etiologies at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialised Hospital (HUCSH).

Methods: A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among newborns aged 0 to 90 days who were admitted to the HUCSH from January 2019 to July 2023. Patient-related information and the culture results were obtained from HUCSH microbiology laboratory registration book. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25 software.

Results: Out of 2364 newborns suspected of having sepsis, 56% (95% CI: 54-58%) had culture-confirmed sepsis. When excluding Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CONS), the prevalence of culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis was 36.9%. The highest numbers of culture-confirmed cases was observed in 2021. The predominant bacteria identified were Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CONS) (34.1%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.9%), and Enterococcus (10.6%). Among culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis, 59.9% and 40.1% of cases were EONS and LONS, respectively. Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus and Enterococcus were the major bacteria found in both EONS and LONS while. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the second most common bacteria among newborns with EONS following CONS.

Conclusions: The prevalence of culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis was relatively high in the study area. Early-onset neonatal sepsis was consistently more prevalent than LONS. The predominant etiologies of neonatal sepsis excluding CONS were K. pneumoniae, Enterococcus, Enterobacter agglomerans, Acinetobacter species, and Staphylococcus aureus. Among newborns with EONS, the predominant bacteria were K. pneumoniae, Enterococcus, Enterobacter agglomerans, and Acinetobacter species.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:在低收入国家,新生儿败血症是发病和死亡的一个重要原因。新生儿败血症分为早发型新生儿败血症(EONS)和晚发型新生儿败血症(LONS)。早发性新生儿败血症的病因大多是在婴儿出生时或出生前从母亲那里垂直感染的,但也有预防的可能。全球新生儿败血症的负担和病因并不一致,各国的收入水平存在巨大差异。本研究旨在确定哈瓦萨大学综合专科医院(HUCSH)的新生儿败血症趋势、发病率和病因:方法:对哈瓦萨大学综合专科医院在 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间收治的 0 至 90 天新生儿进行了一项基于医院的回顾性横断面研究。患者相关信息和培养结果均来自华大儿童医院微生物实验室登记簿。数据分析采用SPSS 25版软件:在 2364 名疑似败血症的新生儿中,56%(95% CI:54-58%)经培养证实患有败血症。如果排除凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CONS),培养证实的新生儿败血症发病率为 36.9%。2021 年的培养确诊病例数最多。鉴定出的主要细菌为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CONS)(34.1%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(12.9%)和肠球菌(10.6%)。在培养确诊的新生儿败血症中,59.9%和 40.1%的病例为 EONS 和 LONS。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和肠球菌是 EONS 和 LONS 中发现的主要细菌。肺炎克雷伯菌是新生儿 EONS 中第二常见的细菌,仅次于 CONS:结论:在研究地区,经培养确诊的新生儿败血症发病率相对较高。早发型新生儿败血症的发病率一直高于长发型新生儿败血症。除CONS外,新生儿败血症的主要病原体是肺炎双球菌、肠球菌、聚合肠杆菌、醋杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。在患有 EONS 的新生儿中,主要病原菌为肺炎双球菌、肠球菌、聚集肠杆菌和醋肽杆菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical diagnostic value of throat swabs in pediatric acute lower respiratory tract infections using targeted next-generation sequencing. Correction: Incidence of loss to follow-up and its predictors among HIV-infected under-five children after initiation of antiretroviral therapy in West Amhara Comprehensive Specialized Referral Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: a multicenter retrospective follow-up study. Gut microbiota signatures in food allergy children without and with malnutrition: a cross-sectional study. The effect of post discharge Kangaroo mother care with and without telephone advice on anthropometric indexes of preterm newborns: a randomized clinical trial. FTO and NOS3 genes associated with pediatric obesity: Corações de Ouro Preto study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1