Associations between dietary diversity and self-rated health in a transverse study of four local food systems (French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Portugal and Senegal).
Michael Rapinski, Richard Raymond, Damien Davy, Jean-Philippe Bedell, Abdou Ka, Jean Lubszynski, Pascal Jean Lopez, Eduardo Ferreira Da Silva, Nathalie El Deghel, Enguerran Macia, Priscilla Duboz
{"title":"Associations between dietary diversity and self-rated health in a transverse study of four local food systems (French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Portugal and Senegal).","authors":"Michael Rapinski, Richard Raymond, Damien Davy, Jean-Philippe Bedell, Abdou Ka, Jean Lubszynski, Pascal Jean Lopez, Eduardo Ferreira Da Silva, Nathalie El Deghel, Enguerran Macia, Priscilla Duboz","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-21872-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The nutrition transition is linked to the double-burden of malnutrition worldwide, and its impact on the quality of life is considerable. The dietary diversity score and self-rated health are two proxies that have been used to assess, for the former, nutrient adequacy and overall diet quality, and for the latter, health from a sociological, epidemiological and economical lens. The general aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between food and subjective health, and to test the hypothesis that greater dietary diversity is positively associated with a better perception of health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A transverse comparison of foods consumed in four highly contrasted local socio-ecosystems (i.e., two French oversea territories: French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Portugal and Senegal) was conducted using 24-hour dietary recalls. Dietary diversity was calculated using 18 food groups based on classifications provided by WHO and FAO. Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between dietary diversity scores and answers to the question assessing self-rated health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 465 individuals, 18 years and older, from Senegal, Guiana, Guadeloupe and Portugal were interviewed using a 24-hour dietary recall. Participants were selected via a combination of non-probability sampling methods. The mean dietary diversity score for all regions combined was 9.22. Over one-third of participants reported their health as 'good' (39.8%), whereas 'bad' and 'excellent' health were the least reported, at 6.45% and 9.03%, respectively. Multiple binary logistic regression notably found that dietary diversity score (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.79, 0.99], p = 0.010) and at-home meal preparation, specifically with the reference category 'all the time' compared to 'never' (OR = 3.31, 95% CI [1.55, 7.07], p = 0.002) were statistically significant predictors of self-rated health (i.e., declaring overall bad health).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates a positive association between dietary diversity and self-rated health across distinct cultural contexts. The findings reinforce the importance of diverse diets for subjective well-being, regardless of differences in food systems. Public health messaging should continue to promote dietary diversity and home-cooked meals as effective strategies for improving health. Self-rated health could serve as a useful tool for quickly assessing the outcomes of nutrition therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"823"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21872-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The nutrition transition is linked to the double-burden of malnutrition worldwide, and its impact on the quality of life is considerable. The dietary diversity score and self-rated health are two proxies that have been used to assess, for the former, nutrient adequacy and overall diet quality, and for the latter, health from a sociological, epidemiological and economical lens. The general aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between food and subjective health, and to test the hypothesis that greater dietary diversity is positively associated with a better perception of health.
Methods: A transverse comparison of foods consumed in four highly contrasted local socio-ecosystems (i.e., two French oversea territories: French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Portugal and Senegal) was conducted using 24-hour dietary recalls. Dietary diversity was calculated using 18 food groups based on classifications provided by WHO and FAO. Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the relationship between dietary diversity scores and answers to the question assessing self-rated health.
Results: Overall, 465 individuals, 18 years and older, from Senegal, Guiana, Guadeloupe and Portugal were interviewed using a 24-hour dietary recall. Participants were selected via a combination of non-probability sampling methods. The mean dietary diversity score for all regions combined was 9.22. Over one-third of participants reported their health as 'good' (39.8%), whereas 'bad' and 'excellent' health were the least reported, at 6.45% and 9.03%, respectively. Multiple binary logistic regression notably found that dietary diversity score (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.79, 0.99], p = 0.010) and at-home meal preparation, specifically with the reference category 'all the time' compared to 'never' (OR = 3.31, 95% CI [1.55, 7.07], p = 0.002) were statistically significant predictors of self-rated health (i.e., declaring overall bad health).
Conclusions: This study demonstrates a positive association between dietary diversity and self-rated health across distinct cultural contexts. The findings reinforce the importance of diverse diets for subjective well-being, regardless of differences in food systems. Public health messaging should continue to promote dietary diversity and home-cooked meals as effective strategies for improving health. Self-rated health could serve as a useful tool for quickly assessing the outcomes of nutrition therapy.
背景:营养转型与全球营养不良的双重负担有关,其对生活质量的影响是相当大的。饮食多样性评分和自评健康是用来评估营养充足性和整体饮食质量的两个指标,而对于后者,则是从社会学、流行病学和经济学角度来评估健康。本研究的总体目的是评估食物与主观健康之间的关系,并检验更大的饮食多样性与更好的健康感知呈正相关的假设。方法:采用24小时饮食回顾法,对四个高度对比的当地社会生态系统(即两个法国海外领地:法属圭亚那、瓜德罗普、葡萄牙和塞内加尔)所消耗的食物进行横向比较。膳食多样性是根据世卫组织和粮农组织提供的分类,使用18个食物类别来计算的。使用二元逻辑回归来评估饮食多样性得分与评估自评健康问题的答案之间的关系。结果:采用24小时饮食召回法对来自塞内加尔、圭亚那、瓜德罗普岛和葡萄牙的465名18岁及以上的个人进行了采访。参与者是通过非概率抽样方法的组合选择的。所有地区的膳食多样性平均得分为9.22。超过三分之一的参与者认为自己的健康状况“良好”(39.8%),而“糟糕”和“极好”的健康状况最少,分别为6.45%和9.03%。多元二元logistic回归显著发现,饮食多样性评分(OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.79, 0.99], p = 0.010)和在家做饭,特别是参考类别“一直”与“从不”相比(OR = 3.31, 95% CI [1.55, 7.07], p = 0.002)是自我评估健康(即宣布整体健康状况不佳)的统计显著预测因子。结论:本研究表明,饮食多样性与不同文化背景下的自评健康呈正相关。研究结果强调了多样化饮食对主观幸福感的重要性,无论食物系统的差异如何。公共卫生信息应继续促进饮食多样性和家常菜,以此作为改善健康的有效战略。自评健康可以作为快速评估营养治疗效果的有用工具。
期刊介绍:
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.