Estimation of the allowable total error of the absolute CD34+ cell count by flow cytometry using data from UK NEQAS exercises 2004-2024.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-03 Print Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1515/cclm-2025-0065
Bruno Brando, Liam Whitby, Arianna Gatti, Alison Whitby, Federico Di Credico, Stuart Scott
{"title":"Estimation of the allowable total error of the absolute CD34+ cell count by flow cytometry using data from UK NEQAS exercises 2004-2024.","authors":"Bruno Brando, Liam Whitby, Arianna Gatti, Alison Whitby, Federico Di Credico, Stuart Scott","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The knowledge of the measurement uncertainty (MU) of a diagnostic laboratory test is essential to keep the reliability of laboratory results under control, is requested by regulatory bodies, and for the clinician to be aware of the grey zone of variability around the reported values. The calculation of the percent allowable total error (%aTE) defines the levels of acceptable and optimal MU for each measurand. The CD34+ hemopoietic precursor cell level in blood, as a flow cytometric measurand, still lacks reliable MU and %aTE indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>%aTE of the absolute count of CD34+ cells in stabilized peripheral blood has been evaluated using a UKNEQAS database of 69,294 valid results entries from the Stem Cell Enumeration EQA/PT Programme over the last 20 years. The state-of-the-art (SOTA) desirable performance achievable by 80 % of participants and the optimal performance by the best laboratories were calculated at four levels of absolute CD34+ cell counts, from 0 to 10 to >50 cells/μL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Double platform users displayed worse %aTE as compared to single platform users in both periods, with a general trend to improvement with time. Single platform users in the 2014-2024 decade performed best, with a flat %aTE trend over the years. The SOTA-based %aTE were calculated for each method and every decision-making cell level, showing relatively narrow ranges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our EQA/PT study with stabilized peripheral blood CD34+ cell suspensions reliably estimated the %aTE of the absolute CD34+ cell count, mostly related to the purely analytical variability and devoid of the preanalytical interferences caused by the decay of fresh samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1190-1198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The knowledge of the measurement uncertainty (MU) of a diagnostic laboratory test is essential to keep the reliability of laboratory results under control, is requested by regulatory bodies, and for the clinician to be aware of the grey zone of variability around the reported values. The calculation of the percent allowable total error (%aTE) defines the levels of acceptable and optimal MU for each measurand. The CD34+ hemopoietic precursor cell level in blood, as a flow cytometric measurand, still lacks reliable MU and %aTE indicators.

Methods: %aTE of the absolute count of CD34+ cells in stabilized peripheral blood has been evaluated using a UKNEQAS database of 69,294 valid results entries from the Stem Cell Enumeration EQA/PT Programme over the last 20 years. The state-of-the-art (SOTA) desirable performance achievable by 80 % of participants and the optimal performance by the best laboratories were calculated at four levels of absolute CD34+ cell counts, from 0 to 10 to >50 cells/μL.

Results: Double platform users displayed worse %aTE as compared to single platform users in both periods, with a general trend to improvement with time. Single platform users in the 2014-2024 decade performed best, with a flat %aTE trend over the years. The SOTA-based %aTE were calculated for each method and every decision-making cell level, showing relatively narrow ranges.

Conclusions: Our EQA/PT study with stabilized peripheral blood CD34+ cell suspensions reliably estimated the %aTE of the absolute CD34+ cell count, mostly related to the purely analytical variability and devoid of the preanalytical interferences caused by the decay of fresh samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用2004-2024年英国NEQAS演习数据,流式细胞术估计绝对CD34+细胞计数的允许总误差。
目的:了解诊断实验室测试的测量不确定度(MU)对于控制实验室结果的可靠性至关重要,这是监管机构所要求的,并且临床医生要意识到报告值周围可变性的灰色地带。允许总误差百分比(%aTE)的计算定义了每个测量的可接受和最佳MU水平。血中CD34+造血前体细胞水平作为一种流式细胞术指标,目前仍缺乏可靠的MU和%aTE指标。方法:使用UKNEQAS数据库的69,294个来自干细胞计数EQA/PT计划的有效结果条目,在过去的20年里评估了稳定外周血中CD34+细胞绝对计数的%aTE。在CD34+细胞绝对计数从0到10到bbb50 细胞/μL的四个水平上,计算了80% %的参与者可达到的最先进(SOTA)理想性能和最佳实验室的最佳性能。结果:双平台用户在两个时间段内的%aTE都比单平台用户差,但总体趋势是随着时间的推移而改善。2014-2024年间,单一平台用户的表现最好,多年来的趋势持平。基于sota的%aTE计算了每种方法和每个决策细胞水平,显示出相对狭窄的范围。结论:我们的EQA/PT研究使用稳定的外周血CD34+细胞悬液可靠地估计了绝对CD34+细胞计数的%aTE,主要与纯分析变异性有关,没有新鲜样品腐烂引起的分析前干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
期刊最新文献
Analytical performance of the Roche Elecsys TnT hs Gen 6 immunoassay. Age- and sex-specific reference intervals for 11-oxygenated androgens from infancy throughout childhood and adulthood. Biological variability of transthyretin in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: implications for therapy monitoring. On the cusp of global lipoprotein(a) standardization. Optimizing diagnostic thresholds of total vitamin B12 (B12) for identifying cobalamin deficiency in adults with macrocytic anemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1