The "8 D's" of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Risk: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2025855
Jace D Johnny, Jeana Escobar, Ray Van Cao, Martin Cheehong Chow, Henry Van Slooten, Zachary Drury
{"title":"The \"8 D's\" of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Risk: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jace D Johnny, Jeana Escobar, Ray Van Cao, Martin Cheehong Chow, Henry Van Slooten, Zachary Drury","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2025855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is commonly used in acute respiratory failure. Despite this therapy's benefits, it also has risks, with therapy failure and intubation delay cited most frequently. Awareness of these risks is important to ensure optimal patient care and guide future research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore risk representation in the literature for acutely ill adult patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute method of evidence synthesis. An a priori search strategy and protocol were carried out using the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and medRxiv databases. After primary screening, data were collected using the REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) tool. Data were prepared, analyzed, and presented using Jupyter Notebook (Python 3.9.7). An online data repository was created to host the associated datasets for future work.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary screening of the 2975 results led to exclusion of 2272 records. After duplicate and redundant articles were removed, articles underwent full-text review, yielding 343 included articles. The most frequently implicated disease in high-flow nasal cannula research was COVID-19 (n = 145), with publication frequency peaking in 2022 (n = 110). All risks fell under 8 categories: deterioration, death, device-related events, delay, disposition, debility, distress, and dysphagia (the \"8 D's\").</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acutely ill patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy encounter 8 categories of risk. Deterioration and death are the most often discussed. Device-related events, delay, disposition, debility, and distress warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"34 2","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2025855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is commonly used in acute respiratory failure. Despite this therapy's benefits, it also has risks, with therapy failure and intubation delay cited most frequently. Awareness of these risks is important to ensure optimal patient care and guide future research.

Objective: To explore risk representation in the literature for acutely ill adult patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy.

Methods: A scoping review was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute method of evidence synthesis. An a priori search strategy and protocol were carried out using the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and medRxiv databases. After primary screening, data were collected using the REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) tool. Data were prepared, analyzed, and presented using Jupyter Notebook (Python 3.9.7). An online data repository was created to host the associated datasets for future work.

Results: Primary screening of the 2975 results led to exclusion of 2272 records. After duplicate and redundant articles were removed, articles underwent full-text review, yielding 343 included articles. The most frequently implicated disease in high-flow nasal cannula research was COVID-19 (n = 145), with publication frequency peaking in 2022 (n = 110). All risks fell under 8 categories: deterioration, death, device-related events, delay, disposition, debility, distress, and dysphagia (the "8 D's").

Conclusion: Acutely ill patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy encounter 8 categories of risk. Deterioration and death are the most often discussed. Device-related events, delay, disposition, debility, and distress warrant further study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:高流量鼻插管供氧疗法常用于急性呼吸衰竭。尽管这种疗法好处多多,但也存在风险,其中最常见的是治疗失败和插管延迟。认识到这些风险对于确保最佳患者护理和指导未来研究非常重要:目的:探讨文献中关于接受高流量鼻插管疗法的急症成人患者的风险表述:方法:采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的证据综合方法进行了范围界定审查。使用 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL Complete 和 medRxiv 数据库执行先验检索策略和协议。初筛后,使用 REDCap(研究电子数据采集)工具收集数据。数据使用 Jupyter Notebook(Python 3.9.7)进行准备、分析和展示。我们还创建了一个在线数据存储库,以存放相关数据集,供未来工作使用:对 2975 条结果进行初步筛选后,排除了 2272 条记录。在删除了重复和多余的文章后,对文章进行了全文审阅,共收录了 343 篇文章。高流量鼻插管研究中最常涉及的疾病是 COVID-19(n = 145),发表频率在 2022 年达到顶峰(n = 110)。所有风险分为 8 类:病情恶化、死亡、设备相关事件、延误、处置、衰弱、窘迫和吞咽困难("8 D"):结论:接受高流量鼻插管治疗的急症患者会遇到 8 类风险。结论:接受高流量鼻插管治疗的急症患者会遇到 8 类风险,其中最常讨论的是病情恶化和死亡。设备相关事件、延迟、处置、衰弱和窘迫值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Symptoms After Recent Orthopedic Surgery. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Bazan Article. Exploring the Risks of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy: What You Should Know. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Outcomes: COVID-19 Pneumonia vs Non-COVID-19 Pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1