Prognostic value of stress phase entropy for predicting major cardiac events in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart and Vessels Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s00380-024-02504-4
Katsunori Fukumoto, Shunichi Yoda, Yudai Tanaka, Takumi Hatta, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Naoya Matsumoto, Yasuo Okumura
{"title":"Prognostic value of stress phase entropy for predicting major cardiac events in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.","authors":"Katsunori Fukumoto, Shunichi Yoda, Yudai Tanaka, Takumi Hatta, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Naoya Matsumoto, Yasuo Okumura","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02504-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are no large-scale reports on the prediction of major cardiac events (MCEs) and risk stratification using phase entropy, a measure of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, in Japanese patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We retrospectively investigated 5541 patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent rest <sup>201</sup>Tl and stress <sup>99m</sup>Tc-tetrofosmin electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and followed them for three years to confirm their prognosis. We excluded patients undergoing revascularization within 3 months before and after the SPECT and those with non-sinus rhythm. The composite endpoint was the onset of MCEs, consisting of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and severe heart failure requiring hospitalization. Poststress phase standard deviation (SD), bandwidth, and entropy were calculated by phase analysis using Heart Risk View-F software. During follow-up, 401 patients experienced MCEs: cardiac death (n = 98), non-fatal MI (n = 76), and severe heart failure (n = 227). Multivariate analysis showed that age, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), stress LV ejection fraction (EF), and stress phase entropy were independent predictors of MCEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant risk stratification between each group in the stress phase entropy quartile. The global chi-squared value predicting MCE onset was significantly improved in the model with summed stress score and LVEF plus entropy but was comparable in the model with added bandwidth or phase SD. Stress phase entropy was a strong predictor of MCEs in Japanese patients with CAD (known or suspected) and was considered the most useful left ventricular dyssynchrony index to improve risk stratification over prediction by perfusion and LVEF assessment alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":" ","pages":"677-687"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02504-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are no large-scale reports on the prediction of major cardiac events (MCEs) and risk stratification using phase entropy, a measure of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, in Japanese patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). We retrospectively investigated 5541 patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent rest 201Tl and stress 99mTc-tetrofosmin electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and followed them for three years to confirm their prognosis. We excluded patients undergoing revascularization within 3 months before and after the SPECT and those with non-sinus rhythm. The composite endpoint was the onset of MCEs, consisting of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and severe heart failure requiring hospitalization. Poststress phase standard deviation (SD), bandwidth, and entropy were calculated by phase analysis using Heart Risk View-F software. During follow-up, 401 patients experienced MCEs: cardiac death (n = 98), non-fatal MI (n = 76), and severe heart failure (n = 227). Multivariate analysis showed that age, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), stress LV ejection fraction (EF), and stress phase entropy were independent predictors of MCEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant risk stratification between each group in the stress phase entropy quartile. The global chi-squared value predicting MCE onset was significantly improved in the model with summed stress score and LVEF plus entropy but was comparable in the model with added bandwidth or phase SD. Stress phase entropy was a strong predictor of MCEs in Japanese patients with CAD (known or suspected) and was considered the most useful left ventricular dyssynchrony index to improve risk stratification over prediction by perfusion and LVEF assessment alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应激相熵预测已知或疑似稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者主要心脏事件的预后价值
在日本已知或疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中,使用相熵预测主要心脏事件(MCEs)和风险分层尚无大规模报道。相熵是左心室(LV)非同步化的一种测量方法。我们回顾性调查了5541例已知或疑似CAD的患者,这些患者接受了静息201Tl和应激99mTc-tetrofosmin心电图(ECG)门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)心肌灌注成像(MPI),并随访3年以确认其预后。我们排除SPECT前后3个月内进行血运重建术的患者和无窦性心律的患者。复合终点为mce的发作,包括心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)和需要住院治疗的严重心力衰竭。采用Heart Risk View-F软件进行相位分析,计算应力后相位标准差(SD)、带宽和熵。在随访期间,401例患者发生mce:心源性死亡(n = 98),非致死性心肌梗死(n = 76)和严重心力衰竭(n = 227)。多因素分析显示,年龄、糖尿病、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、应激左室射血分数(EF)和应激相熵是mce的独立预测因子。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在应力相熵四分位数中,各组之间存在显著的风险分层。综合应力评分和LVEF加熵的模型预测MCE发作的总体卡方值显著提高,但与增加带宽或相位SD的模型相当。应激相熵是日本CAD患者(已知或疑似)mce的一个强有力的预测指标,被认为是比仅通过灌注和LVEF评估预测改善风险分层最有用的左室非同步化指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Impact of right bundle branch block in anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the contemporary primary PCI era. Prognostic impact of preoperative liver function on outcomes in patients undergoing Impella® implantation. Reply to "Epicardial adipose tissue in atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: A bystander or participant?" Beyond the scale: reconciling the obesity paradox in the oldest heart failure patients. Response to "beyond the scale: reconciling the obesity paradox in the oldest heart failure patients".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1