Drawing on collective action theory to foster sustainable biosimilar markets - insights from co-creation workshops with UK and Belgian stakeholders.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2474604
Teresa Barcina Lacosta, Arnold G Vulto, Florian Turk, Isabelle Huys, Steven Simoens
{"title":"Drawing on collective action theory to foster sustainable biosimilar markets - insights from co-creation workshops with UK and Belgian stakeholders.","authors":"Teresa Barcina Lacosta, Arnold G Vulto, Florian Turk, Isabelle Huys, Steven Simoens","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2474604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has signaled the need for reformed biosimilar policy frameworks that adopt a behavioral approach, are informed by consensus-generating strategies and thus better align with the requirements of local healthcare communities.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Through a series of co-creation workshops, the current study explores the feasibility of applying learnings from Collective Action Theory to formulate evidence-based multistakeholder-supported policy recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insights from the conducted workshops indicate that future policy frameworks would benefit from: 1) a working system of incentives and rewards aligned with stakeholder needs; 2) evaluating the cost-benefit balance for stakeholders prior to policy implementation; 3) involving multistakeholder panels in policy co-design; 4) adopting a long-term vision; 5) fostering coordination at the interface between levels of governance; 6) defining shared goals and efficient systems to monitor policy compliance; and 7) using policy outcome data to adapt current policy frameworks based on evolving needs. The incorporation of these elements to policies is expected to help prioritize long-term sustainable solutions, and balance short-term gains and long-term objectives in biosimilar markets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study constitutes a first approach to developing multistakeholder-supported principles for sustainable biosimilar markets. This is a necessary step toward generating stakeholders' consensus on biosimilar policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2474604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research has signaled the need for reformed biosimilar policy frameworks that adopt a behavioral approach, are informed by consensus-generating strategies and thus better align with the requirements of local healthcare communities.

Research design and methods: Through a series of co-creation workshops, the current study explores the feasibility of applying learnings from Collective Action Theory to formulate evidence-based multistakeholder-supported policy recommendations.

Results: Insights from the conducted workshops indicate that future policy frameworks would benefit from: 1) a working system of incentives and rewards aligned with stakeholder needs; 2) evaluating the cost-benefit balance for stakeholders prior to policy implementation; 3) involving multistakeholder panels in policy co-design; 4) adopting a long-term vision; 5) fostering coordination at the interface between levels of governance; 6) defining shared goals and efficient systems to monitor policy compliance; and 7) using policy outcome data to adapt current policy frameworks based on evolving needs. The incorporation of these elements to policies is expected to help prioritize long-term sustainable solutions, and balance short-term gains and long-term objectives in biosimilar markets.

Conclusions: This study constitutes a first approach to developing multistakeholder-supported principles for sustainable biosimilar markets. This is a necessary step toward generating stakeholders' consensus on biosimilar policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
借鉴集体行动理论,促进可持续的生物仿制药市场--从与英国和比利时利益相关者的共同创造研讨会中获得的启示。
背景:研究表明,有必要改革生物类似药政策框架,采用行为方法,了解产生共识的战略,从而更好地与当地卫生保健社区的要求保持一致。研究设计和方法:本研究通过一系列共同创造研讨会,探讨了运用集体行动理论的经验来制定基于证据的多利益相关者支持的政策建议的可行性。结果:从所举办的研讨会中得出的见解表明,未来的政策框架将受益于:1)符合利益相关者需求的激励和奖励工作系统;2)在政策实施前评估利益相关者的成本效益平衡;3)让多利益相关方小组参与政策共同设计;4)着眼长远;5)加强各级政府之间的协调;6)确定共同目标和有效系统,以监测政策合规性;7)根据不断变化的需求,利用政策结果数据来调整当前的政策框架。将这些要素纳入政策,预计将有助于确定长期可持续解决方案的优先顺序,并平衡生物仿制药市场的短期收益和长期目标。结论:本研究构成了开发可持续生物类似药市场的多利益相关者支持原则的第一种方法。这是促使利益相关者就生物仿制药政策达成共识的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Step-up or early intensive therapy in psoriatic arthritis: aligning treatment intensity with disease biology. Immunomodulator therapies in pandemics: lessons from COVID-19 and a blueprint for future outbreaks. The role of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of lupus nephritis. Aflibercept-ayyh (aflibercept 2 mg biosimilar) for treatment-naïve retinal vascular diseases: early real-world experience - the APEX study. Itepekimab for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1