Defining normative side-to-side differences in the distal tibiofibular joint of healthy individuals using weight-bearing CT 3D image analysis

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.015
Lorena Bejarano-Pineda , Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani , Matthias Peiffer , Atta Taseh , Rohan Bhimani , Gregory Waryasz , Gino M.M. Kerkhoffs , Mario Maas , Daniel Guss , Christopher W. DiGiovanni
{"title":"Defining normative side-to-side differences in the distal tibiofibular joint of healthy individuals using weight-bearing CT 3D image analysis","authors":"Lorena Bejarano-Pineda ,&nbsp;Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani ,&nbsp;Matthias Peiffer ,&nbsp;Atta Taseh ,&nbsp;Rohan Bhimani ,&nbsp;Gregory Waryasz ,&nbsp;Gino M.M. Kerkhoffs ,&nbsp;Mario Maas ,&nbsp;Daniel Guss ,&nbsp;Christopher W. DiGiovanni","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Accurate quantification of bony malalignment within the ankle syndesmosis is crucial in diagnosing syndesmotic instability, especially when subtle. While three-dimensional (3D) measurement techniques using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) have gained popularity, normative bilateral comparative data still need to be established. This study aimed to identify the side-to-side variations and gender differences in the syndesmotic area and volume among individuals without syndesmotic injury using WBCT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective analysis was conducted on bilateral ankle WBCT imaging of 88 individuals who underwent imaging for non-ankle-related injury or pathology. Two-dimensional area (at 1, 3, and 5 cm proximal to the tibial plafond) and three-dimensional volumetric (from 0.5 mm proximal to the tibial plafond and up to 3 and 5 cm proximally) measurements were obtained for bilateral ankles. Mean ( ± SD) values, percentage right-to-left differences, and gender differences were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Although there were no significant differences between laterality in any of the measurements, the largest right-to-left difference was 8.9 at the syndesmotic area at 3 cm above the tibial plafond in general. Contrarily, significant gender differences were found in the areas and volumes, with the largest difference observed for the 0.5–5 cm volume (8.41 ± 0.87 vs 7.45 ± 1.47 in male vs female, respectively; P = 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The mean side-to-site variation in the syndesmotic area and volume among individuals without syndesmotic injury is less than 9 %, and a side-to-side volume difference greater than 19 % might be indicative of abnormality. Additionally, gender-specific differences highlight the importance of considering gender norms in ankle syndesmosis evaluation and the need to use the contralateral side as a comparison.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":"31 7","pages":"Pages 583-586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773125000463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Accurate quantification of bony malalignment within the ankle syndesmosis is crucial in diagnosing syndesmotic instability, especially when subtle. While three-dimensional (3D) measurement techniques using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) have gained popularity, normative bilateral comparative data still need to be established. This study aimed to identify the side-to-side variations and gender differences in the syndesmotic area and volume among individuals without syndesmotic injury using WBCT.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted on bilateral ankle WBCT imaging of 88 individuals who underwent imaging for non-ankle-related injury or pathology. Two-dimensional area (at 1, 3, and 5 cm proximal to the tibial plafond) and three-dimensional volumetric (from 0.5 mm proximal to the tibial plafond and up to 3 and 5 cm proximally) measurements were obtained for bilateral ankles. Mean ( ± SD) values, percentage right-to-left differences, and gender differences were analyzed.

Results

Although there were no significant differences between laterality in any of the measurements, the largest right-to-left difference was 8.9 at the syndesmotic area at 3 cm above the tibial plafond in general. Contrarily, significant gender differences were found in the areas and volumes, with the largest difference observed for the 0.5–5 cm volume (8.41 ± 0.87 vs 7.45 ± 1.47 in male vs female, respectively; P = 0.001).

Conclusion

The mean side-to-site variation in the syndesmotic area and volume among individuals without syndesmotic injury is less than 9 %, and a side-to-side volume difference greater than 19 % might be indicative of abnormality. Additionally, gender-specific differences highlight the importance of considering gender norms in ankle syndesmosis evaluation and the need to use the contralateral side as a comparison.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用负重CT三维图像分析确定健康个体远端胫腓骨关节的标准侧对侧差异。
背景和目的:准确量化踝关节联合内的骨错位对诊断关节联合不稳定至关重要,尤其是在细微的情况下。虽然使用负重计算机断层扫描(WBCT)的三维(3D)测量技术已经得到普及,但仍然需要建立规范的双边比较数据。本研究旨在通过WBCT确定无骨联合损伤个体间骨联合面积和体积的侧对侧变化和性别差异。方法:回顾性分析88例因非踝关节相关损伤或病理接受影像学检查的双侧踝关节WBCT影像学资料。获得双侧踝关节的二维面积(胫骨平台近端1,3,5 cm)和三维体积(胫骨平台近端0.5 mm至近端3和5 cm)测量值。分析平均值( ± SD)值、百分比从右到左差异和性别差异。结果:虽然在任何测量中侧边度没有显著差异,但在胫骨平台上方3 cm处的胫联合区,一般情况下最大的左右差异为8.9。相反,在面积和体积上存在显著的性别差异,其中0.5-5 cm体积差异最大,男女差异分别为8.41 ± 0.87和7.45 ± 1.47; = 0.001页)。结论:无韧带联合损伤个体的韧带联合面积和体积的平均侧位差异小于9 %,大于19 %的侧位差异可能提示异常。此外,性别差异突出了在评估踝关节联合时考虑性别规范的重要性,并需要使用对侧作为比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Mid-term biomechanical gait analysis of osteosynthesis in bony Lisfranc injuries. The fibular groove deep and its relationship with the superior peroneal retinaculum morphology in peroneal tendon stability: A cadaveric study. Comparing patient reported outcomes and complications following open versus minimally invasive double and triple arthrodesis for rigid flatfoot deformity: A retrospective analysis. Autologous osteochondral transplantation versus dorsiflexion closing wedge metatarsal osteotomy for Freiberg's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Talar neck and body fractures: An observational cohort study originating from the Swedish Fracture Register.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1