Jiyun Hu, Shucai Xie, Ya Liao, Tao Chen, Zhaoxin Qian, Lina Zhang
{"title":"Diagnosis for Neonatal Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: Don't Forget Neuropathological Biomarkers","authors":"Jiyun Hu, Shucai Xie, Ya Liao, Tao Chen, Zhaoxin Qian, Lina Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Neonatal sepsis-associated encephalopathy (nSAE) poses significant diagnostic challenges due to nonspecific clinical manifestations and limitations of current diagnostic standards. It is imperative to conduct extensive research to elucidate the intricate relationship between neuropathological biomarkers and neonatal sepsis, which represents an intriguing and significant subject for exploration. This article emphasizes the critical need to integrate neuropathological biomarkers, such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), Tau, and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), into diagnostic protocols to improve early detection, prognostication, and personalized management of nSAE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A narrative synthesis of existing literature and clinical studies was conducted, focusing on the role of neuropathological biomarkers in nSAE. Key studies evaluating serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of NSE, S100β, GFAP, Tau, and UCH-L1 were analyzed. Mechanistic pathways, temporal biomarker patterns, and comparative analyses with inflammatory/metabolic biomarkers were reviewed to assess diagnostic and prognostic utility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Elevated levels of neuropathological biomarkers, particularly NSE and S100β, were strongly associated with neuronal and glial injury in nSAE. These biomarkers correlated with adverse outcomes, including cognitive impairment and developmental delays. For example, NSE levels reflected hypoxia-induced neuronal damage, while S100β indicated astrocytic activation and severity of brain injury. Tau and UCH-L1 demonstrated potential for tracking neurodegeneration, and GFAP highlighted astrocytic reactivity. However, no universally accepted diagnostic criteria or validated biomarker thresholds exist for neonates, contrasting with adult sepsis-associated encephalopathy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Neuropathological biomarkers offer promising tools for stratifying nSAE severity, guiding neuroprotective interventions, and improving prognostication. Future research must prioritize large-scale clinical validation, mechanistic studies, and comparative analyses with other biomarker categories to establish standardized protocols. Integrating these biomarkers into neonatal care could enhance early diagnosis, inform targeted therapies, and mitigate long-term neurological morbidity. Addressing these gaps is critical for advancing precision medicine in neonatal sepsis management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 123840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025001962","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Neonatal sepsis-associated encephalopathy (nSAE) poses significant diagnostic challenges due to nonspecific clinical manifestations and limitations of current diagnostic standards. It is imperative to conduct extensive research to elucidate the intricate relationship between neuropathological biomarkers and neonatal sepsis, which represents an intriguing and significant subject for exploration. This article emphasizes the critical need to integrate neuropathological biomarkers, such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100β, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), Tau, and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), into diagnostic protocols to improve early detection, prognostication, and personalized management of nSAE.
Methods
A narrative synthesis of existing literature and clinical studies was conducted, focusing on the role of neuropathological biomarkers in nSAE. Key studies evaluating serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of NSE, S100β, GFAP, Tau, and UCH-L1 were analyzed. Mechanistic pathways, temporal biomarker patterns, and comparative analyses with inflammatory/metabolic biomarkers were reviewed to assess diagnostic and prognostic utility.
Results
Elevated levels of neuropathological biomarkers, particularly NSE and S100β, were strongly associated with neuronal and glial injury in nSAE. These biomarkers correlated with adverse outcomes, including cognitive impairment and developmental delays. For example, NSE levels reflected hypoxia-induced neuronal damage, while S100β indicated astrocytic activation and severity of brain injury. Tau and UCH-L1 demonstrated potential for tracking neurodegeneration, and GFAP highlighted astrocytic reactivity. However, no universally accepted diagnostic criteria or validated biomarker thresholds exist for neonates, contrasting with adult sepsis-associated encephalopathy.
Conclusions
Neuropathological biomarkers offer promising tools for stratifying nSAE severity, guiding neuroprotective interventions, and improving prognostication. Future research must prioritize large-scale clinical validation, mechanistic studies, and comparative analyses with other biomarker categories to establish standardized protocols. Integrating these biomarkers into neonatal care could enhance early diagnosis, inform targeted therapies, and mitigate long-term neurological morbidity. Addressing these gaps is critical for advancing precision medicine in neonatal sepsis management.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS