Application of Nordic Keyhole and Nutri-Score for assessment of nutritional quality of plant-based dairy analogues.

IF 2.2 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMC Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1186/s40795-025-01023-3
Hanieh Moshtaghian, Elinor Hallström, Marta Bianchi, Susanne Bryngelsson
{"title":"Application of Nordic Keyhole and Nutri-Score for assessment of nutritional quality of plant-based dairy analogues.","authors":"Hanieh Moshtaghian, Elinor Hallström, Marta Bianchi, Susanne Bryngelsson","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01023-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public interest in plant-based dairy analogues is increasing; thus, their assessment by front-of-pack nutrition labelling schemes such as Keyhole and Nutri-Score can facilitate the identification of products with optimal nutritional quality. In this study, Keyhole and the latest version of Nutri-Score criteria were applied to plant-based dairy analogues (i.e., milk, yoghurt, cheese, cream, fat spread, and ice cream analogues) in the Swedish market to evaluate their nutritional quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nutritional data for 222 plant-based dairy analogues were collected from food manufacturers' websites, and the eligibility of these analogues for Keyhole and Nutri-Score (A to E) were assessed. Products eligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B were deemed to have optimal nutritional quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16% of plant-based milk analogues (from oat-, almond-, rice-, and potato-based products), 2% of plant-based yoghurt analogues and 37% of plant-based fat spread analogues were eligible for Keyhole. The plant-based cheese, cream and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Keyhole. None of the plant-based milk analogues qualified for Nutri-Score A, and 45% (mainly soy-, almond-, coconut-, pea- and mixed-based products) qualified for Nutri-Score B. 68% of plant-based yoghurt analogues (from oat-, soy-, almond- and mixed-based products) qualified for Nutri-Score A or B. The plant-based cheese, fat spread and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Nutri-Score A or B and 32% of plant-based cream analogues qualified for Nutri-Score B. A higher percentage of organic milk analogues and a lower percentage of organic yoghurt analogues were eligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B compared to their non-organic varieties. Keyhole and Nutri-Score had an agreement on classifying two plant-based dairy analogues as optimal nutritional quality products and 133 plant-based dairy analogues as suboptimal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is variability in the eligibility of plant-based dairy analogues for Keyhole and Nutri-Score labelling. Eligibility for Keyhole was highest among plant-based fat spread analogues, while Nutri-Score A and B ratings were more common for plant-based yoghurt analogues. Plant-based cheese and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B. Since the micronutrient content of organic and non-organic plant-based dairy analogues did not affect their evaluation by Keyhole and Nutri-Score, this limitation warrants further consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01023-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Public interest in plant-based dairy analogues is increasing; thus, their assessment by front-of-pack nutrition labelling schemes such as Keyhole and Nutri-Score can facilitate the identification of products with optimal nutritional quality. In this study, Keyhole and the latest version of Nutri-Score criteria were applied to plant-based dairy analogues (i.e., milk, yoghurt, cheese, cream, fat spread, and ice cream analogues) in the Swedish market to evaluate their nutritional quality.

Methods: Nutritional data for 222 plant-based dairy analogues were collected from food manufacturers' websites, and the eligibility of these analogues for Keyhole and Nutri-Score (A to E) were assessed. Products eligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B were deemed to have optimal nutritional quality.

Results: 16% of plant-based milk analogues (from oat-, almond-, rice-, and potato-based products), 2% of plant-based yoghurt analogues and 37% of plant-based fat spread analogues were eligible for Keyhole. The plant-based cheese, cream and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Keyhole. None of the plant-based milk analogues qualified for Nutri-Score A, and 45% (mainly soy-, almond-, coconut-, pea- and mixed-based products) qualified for Nutri-Score B. 68% of plant-based yoghurt analogues (from oat-, soy-, almond- and mixed-based products) qualified for Nutri-Score A or B. The plant-based cheese, fat spread and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Nutri-Score A or B and 32% of plant-based cream analogues qualified for Nutri-Score B. A higher percentage of organic milk analogues and a lower percentage of organic yoghurt analogues were eligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B compared to their non-organic varieties. Keyhole and Nutri-Score had an agreement on classifying two plant-based dairy analogues as optimal nutritional quality products and 133 plant-based dairy analogues as suboptimal.

Conclusions: There is variability in the eligibility of plant-based dairy analogues for Keyhole and Nutri-Score labelling. Eligibility for Keyhole was highest among plant-based fat spread analogues, while Nutri-Score A and B ratings were more common for plant-based yoghurt analogues. Plant-based cheese and ice cream analogues were ineligible for Keyhole and Nutri-Score A or B. Since the micronutrient content of organic and non-organic plant-based dairy analogues did not affect their evaluation by Keyhole and Nutri-Score, this limitation warrants further consideration.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用Nordic Keyhole和nutrition - score评价植物性乳制品类似物的营养质量。
背景:公众对植物性乳制品类似物的兴趣正在增加;因此,通过包装正面营养标签计划(如Keyhole和nutrii - score)对其进行评估,可以方便识别具有最佳营养品质的产品。在这项研究中,Keyhole和最新版本的nutrition - score标准被应用于瑞典市场上的植物性乳制品类似物(即牛奶、酸奶、奶酪、奶油、脂肪涂抹和冰淇淋类似物),以评估其营养质量。方法:从食品制造商网站收集222种植物性乳制品类似物的营养数据,并对这些类似物进行Keyhole和nutrition - score (A ~ E)的合格性评估。符合Keyhole和nutrition - score A或B的产品被认为具有最佳的营养质量。结果:16%的植物性牛奶类似物(来自燕麦、杏仁、大米和土豆产品)、2%的植物性酸奶类似物和37%的植物性脂肪涂抹类似物符合Keyhole的条件。基于植物的奶酪、奶油和冰淇淋类似物不符合Keyhole的条件。没有植物性牛奶类似物符合营养A分,45%(主要是大豆、杏仁、椰子、豌豆和混合产品)符合营养b分。68%的植物性酸奶类似物(来自燕麦、大豆、杏仁和混合产品)符合营养A分或b分。脂肪涂抹和冰淇淋类似物不符合营养A或B分,32%的植物性奶油类似物符合营养B分。有机牛奶类似物的比例较高,有机酸奶类似物的比例较低,与非有机品种相比,符合Keyhole和营养A或B分。Keyhole和nutrition - score在将两种植物性乳制品类似物分类为最佳营养质量产品和133种植物性乳制品类似物分类为次优营养质量产品方面达成了协议。结论:植物性乳制品类似物用于Keyhole和nutrition - score标签的合格性存在差异。在植物性脂肪涂抹类似物中,Keyhole的资格最高,而植物性酸奶类似物的营养评分为A和B。基于植物的奶酪和冰淇淋类似物不符合Keyhole和nutrition - score A或b的标准。由于有机和非有机植物性乳制品类似物的微量营养素含量不影响Keyhole和nutrition - score的评估,因此这一限制值得进一步考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the association between diet quality scores, inflammation and treatment outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an exploratory observational study. Eating healthy within the boundaries of one planet: case study for the Netherlands. Social media use and associated food-related habits among Kenyan teenagers: a cross-sectional study of digital influence on public health nutrition. Effect of a digital dietary intervention on diet quality in young adults in Norway - The PREPARED randomised controlled trial. Adverse events and tolerability of ketogenic diets - a systematic literature analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1