Estimating Pressed and Breathy Phonation From Cepstral and Spectral Measures.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Voice Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.017
Laura E Toles, Olivia Murton
{"title":"Estimating Pressed and Breathy Phonation From Cepstral and Spectral Measures.","authors":"Laura E Toles, Olivia Murton","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine (1) how cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and the amplitude difference between the first two spectral harmonics (H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub>) change as a function of using pressed and breathy voice production in vocally healthy individuals and (2) whether CPP and H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub> can discriminate breathy and pressed phonation from typical phonation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Acoustic voice recordings were obtained from 50 vocally healthy individuals. Speech tasks included five repetitions of three sustained vowels (/ɑ, i, u/) and one all-voiced sentence (\"We were away a year ago\") using three voice production conditions (typical, breathy, and pressed). For each production, we calculated average smoothed CPP and H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub>. Mixed ANOVA models and post hoc pairwise comparisons were used to determine how the acoustic measures differed across phonation conditions and whether those differences varied by sex. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to determine whether measures could differentiate the phonation types, controlling for pitch and intensity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In connected speech, pressed phonation demonstrated higher CPP and lower H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub> compared with typical phonation, whereas breathy phonation had lower CPP and higher H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub>. Female participants also exhibited higher CPP and lower H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub> during pressed phonation compared with typical phonation on all sustained vowels. Male participants did not have significant differences in either measure between typical and pressed phonation in any sustained vowel but did have lower CPP/higher H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub> during breathy phonation. CPP and H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub> each significantly differentiated pressed from typical phonation in most speech tasks, but neither differentiated pressed from typical phonation in sustained /i/ tasks. CPP differentiated breathy from typical phonation when controlling for intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPP and H<sub>1</sub>-H<sub>2</sub> respond to changes in phonation patterns. The results indicate within-person changes in each measure could indicate a change in vocal function. In particular, pressed phonation resulted in increased CPP in all speech tasks for females and in connected speech for males, suggesting that CPP increasing too much could be associated with vocal hyperfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.02.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine (1) how cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and the amplitude difference between the first two spectral harmonics (H1-H2) change as a function of using pressed and breathy voice production in vocally healthy individuals and (2) whether CPP and H1-H2 can discriminate breathy and pressed phonation from typical phonation.

Method: Acoustic voice recordings were obtained from 50 vocally healthy individuals. Speech tasks included five repetitions of three sustained vowels (/ɑ, i, u/) and one all-voiced sentence ("We were away a year ago") using three voice production conditions (typical, breathy, and pressed). For each production, we calculated average smoothed CPP and H1-H2. Mixed ANOVA models and post hoc pairwise comparisons were used to determine how the acoustic measures differed across phonation conditions and whether those differences varied by sex. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to determine whether measures could differentiate the phonation types, controlling for pitch and intensity.

Results: In connected speech, pressed phonation demonstrated higher CPP and lower H1-H2 compared with typical phonation, whereas breathy phonation had lower CPP and higher H1-H2. Female participants also exhibited higher CPP and lower H1-H2 during pressed phonation compared with typical phonation on all sustained vowels. Male participants did not have significant differences in either measure between typical and pressed phonation in any sustained vowel but did have lower CPP/higher H1-H2 during breathy phonation. CPP and H1-H2 each significantly differentiated pressed from typical phonation in most speech tasks, but neither differentiated pressed from typical phonation in sustained /i/ tasks. CPP differentiated breathy from typical phonation when controlling for intensity.

Conclusion: CPP and H1-H2 respond to changes in phonation patterns. The results indicate within-person changes in each measure could indicate a change in vocal function. In particular, pressed phonation resulted in increased CPP in all speech tasks for females and in connected speech for males, suggesting that CPP increasing too much could be associated with vocal hyperfunction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从倒频谱和频谱测量估算压音和喘气音
目的:本研究旨在确定(1)在发声健康的个体中,倒谱峰突出(CPP)和前两个谱谐波的振幅差(H1-H2)如何随着使用按压发声和呼吸发声而变化;(2)CPP和H1-H2是否能够区分呼吸发声和按压发声与典型发声。方法:对50名声带健康的人进行录音。语音任务包括五次重复三个连续元音(/ /,i, u/)和一个全浊音句子(“We were away a year ago”),使用三种发声条件(典型,呼吸和按压)。对于每次生产,我们计算了平均平滑CPP和H1-H2。使用混合方差分析模型和事后两两比较来确定声学测量在不同发声条件下的差异,以及这些差异是否因性别而异。使用多项逻辑回归模型来确定测量是否可以区分发声类型,控制音高和强度。结果:在连通语音中,按压发声较典型发声CPP高,H1-H2低,而呼吸发声CPP低,H1-H2高。女性被试在按音过程中也表现出较高的CPP和较低的H1-H2。男性参与者在任何持续元音的典型发音和按压发音之间的任何测量都没有显着差异,但在呼吸发音时确实有较低的CPP/较高的H1-H2。CPP和H1-H2在大多数语音任务中均显著区分了pressed和典型发声,但在持续/i/任务中均未区分pressed和典型发声。在控制强度时,CPP将呼吸声与典型发声区分开来。结论:CPP和H1-H2对发声模式的改变有响应。结果表明,每一项测量的个人变化都可能表明声音功能的变化。特别是,按压发声导致女性在所有语音任务中CPP增加,而男性在连接语音中CPP增加过多,这表明CPP增加过多可能与声音功能亢进有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
期刊最新文献
Construction of a New Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease Animal Model. Acoustic Parameters of the Voice in the Polish Population: Normative Values Based on MDVP Tests. Self-Oscillating Vocal Fold Models Coupled to 3D-Printed Vocal Tracts, Part II: Aerodynamics and Kinematics with and without Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract (SOVT) Tubes at Constant Low-Flow Conditions. Dysphonia in Cisgender-Females Secondary to Testosterone Therapy. Comparison of Auditory Perceptual Ratings Between Australian and Cantonese Listeners on Normal and Disordered Voices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1