Enhanced deuterium extraction efficiency from lithium-lead droplets in a vacuum

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Fusion Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114917
Fumito Okino , Yukinori Hamaji , Juro Yagi , Teruya Tanaka
{"title":"Enhanced deuterium extraction efficiency from lithium-lead droplets in a vacuum","authors":"Fumito Okino ,&nbsp;Yukinori Hamaji ,&nbsp;Juro Yagi ,&nbsp;Teruya Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The authors conducted tritium extraction from falling liquid lithium-lead (LiPb) droplets in a fusion blanket loop. We reported an extraction efficiency above 0.6 from LiPb droplets of diameter 1.89 mm at 15th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technologies (ISFNT15_2023). Even though it is still below the European Demonstration Power Plant (EU-DEMO) design criteria of above 0.8 which is commonly recognized as requisite minimum. Furthermore, many droplet nozzles are required to attain LiPb flow rate design criteria. Therefore, the aim is to increase the efficiency and flow rate. Enlarging the droplet diameter is a simple way to boost the flow rate. However, this degrades the efficiency. To address this drawback, we considered the tandem extraction method, which consists of two extraction processes. In the first process, dissolved deuterium is extracted from the partially filled LiPb flow in an inlet pipe under a vacuum. The second process entails the conventional extraction from falling droplets. Experimental verifications and theoretical analyses were performed at the liquid metal experimental test loop installed at the National Institute for Fusion Science, at Toki Japan. A droplet size of 2.27 mm, 1.44 times the flow rate than the previous 1.89 mm, is applied to verify the process. The obtained overall efficiencies were between 0.75and 0.95, exceeding the estimated range of 0.65–0.85. The matured turbulent flow at the nozzle boosted the release of droplets, along with the tandem extraction. Other enhancement factors such as droplet break-up and surface oscillation were considered as scarce effects. Further verifications are inevitable even when the results suggest a high-efficiency extraction feasibility from larger droplets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55133,"journal":{"name":"Fusion Engineering and Design","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 114917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fusion Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092037962500119X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors conducted tritium extraction from falling liquid lithium-lead (LiPb) droplets in a fusion blanket loop. We reported an extraction efficiency above 0.6 from LiPb droplets of diameter 1.89 mm at 15th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technologies (ISFNT15_2023). Even though it is still below the European Demonstration Power Plant (EU-DEMO) design criteria of above 0.8 which is commonly recognized as requisite minimum. Furthermore, many droplet nozzles are required to attain LiPb flow rate design criteria. Therefore, the aim is to increase the efficiency and flow rate. Enlarging the droplet diameter is a simple way to boost the flow rate. However, this degrades the efficiency. To address this drawback, we considered the tandem extraction method, which consists of two extraction processes. In the first process, dissolved deuterium is extracted from the partially filled LiPb flow in an inlet pipe under a vacuum. The second process entails the conventional extraction from falling droplets. Experimental verifications and theoretical analyses were performed at the liquid metal experimental test loop installed at the National Institute for Fusion Science, at Toki Japan. A droplet size of 2.27 mm, 1.44 times the flow rate than the previous 1.89 mm, is applied to verify the process. The obtained overall efficiencies were between 0.75and 0.95, exceeding the estimated range of 0.65–0.85. The matured turbulent flow at the nozzle boosted the release of droplets, along with the tandem extraction. Other enhancement factors such as droplet break-up and surface oscillation were considered as scarce effects. Further verifications are inevitable even when the results suggest a high-efficiency extraction feasibility from larger droplets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fusion Engineering and Design
Fusion Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
23.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers about experiments (both plasma and technology), theory, models, methods, and designs in areas relating to technology, engineering, and applied science aspects of magnetic and inertial fusion energy. Specific areas of interest include: MFE and IFE design studies for experiments and reactors; fusion nuclear technologies and materials, including blankets and shields; analysis of reactor plasmas; plasma heating, fuelling, and vacuum systems; drivers, targets, and special technologies for IFE, controls and diagnostics; fuel cycle analysis and tritium reprocessing and handling; operations and remote maintenance of reactors; safety, decommissioning, and waste management; economic and environmental analysis of components and systems.
期刊最新文献
A risk analysis for Helium Cooling System (HCS) of HCCP-TBS Preliminary fault analysis of EFCC system in the Divertor Tokamak Test (DTT) facility Development of transport calculation for unstructured mesh geometry in cosRMC Thermofluid-dynamic assessment of the dual cooling scheme EU-DEMO divertor cassette Insight into the structural integrity assessment of the European DEMO Fusion Reactor Divertor (Part I: General discussion)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1