Enhanced deuterium extraction efficiency from lithium-lead droplets in a vacuum

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Fusion Engineering and Design Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114917
Fumito Okino , Yukinori Hamaji , Juro Yagi , Teruya Tanaka
{"title":"Enhanced deuterium extraction efficiency from lithium-lead droplets in a vacuum","authors":"Fumito Okino ,&nbsp;Yukinori Hamaji ,&nbsp;Juro Yagi ,&nbsp;Teruya Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The authors conducted tritium extraction from falling liquid lithium-lead (LiPb) droplets in a fusion blanket loop. We reported an extraction efficiency above 0.6 from LiPb droplets of diameter 1.89 mm at 15th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technologies (ISFNT15_2023). Even though it is still below the European Demonstration Power Plant (EU-DEMO) design criteria of above 0.8 which is commonly recognized as requisite minimum. Furthermore, many droplet nozzles are required to attain LiPb flow rate design criteria. Therefore, the aim is to increase the efficiency and flow rate. Enlarging the droplet diameter is a simple way to boost the flow rate. However, this degrades the efficiency. To address this drawback, we considered the tandem extraction method, which consists of two extraction processes. In the first process, dissolved deuterium is extracted from the partially filled LiPb flow in an inlet pipe under a vacuum. The second process entails the conventional extraction from falling droplets. Experimental verifications and theoretical analyses were performed at the liquid metal experimental test loop installed at the National Institute for Fusion Science, at Toki Japan. A droplet size of 2.27 mm, 1.44 times the flow rate than the previous 1.89 mm, is applied to verify the process. The obtained overall efficiencies were between 0.75and 0.95, exceeding the estimated range of 0.65–0.85. The matured turbulent flow at the nozzle boosted the release of droplets, along with the tandem extraction. Other enhancement factors such as droplet break-up and surface oscillation were considered as scarce effects. Further verifications are inevitable even when the results suggest a high-efficiency extraction feasibility from larger droplets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55133,"journal":{"name":"Fusion Engineering and Design","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 114917"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fusion Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092037962500119X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors conducted tritium extraction from falling liquid lithium-lead (LiPb) droplets in a fusion blanket loop. We reported an extraction efficiency above 0.6 from LiPb droplets of diameter 1.89 mm at 15th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technologies (ISFNT15_2023). Even though it is still below the European Demonstration Power Plant (EU-DEMO) design criteria of above 0.8 which is commonly recognized as requisite minimum. Furthermore, many droplet nozzles are required to attain LiPb flow rate design criteria. Therefore, the aim is to increase the efficiency and flow rate. Enlarging the droplet diameter is a simple way to boost the flow rate. However, this degrades the efficiency. To address this drawback, we considered the tandem extraction method, which consists of two extraction processes. In the first process, dissolved deuterium is extracted from the partially filled LiPb flow in an inlet pipe under a vacuum. The second process entails the conventional extraction from falling droplets. Experimental verifications and theoretical analyses were performed at the liquid metal experimental test loop installed at the National Institute for Fusion Science, at Toki Japan. A droplet size of 2.27 mm, 1.44 times the flow rate than the previous 1.89 mm, is applied to verify the process. The obtained overall efficiencies were between 0.75and 0.95, exceeding the estimated range of 0.65–0.85. The matured turbulent flow at the nozzle boosted the release of droplets, along with the tandem extraction. Other enhancement factors such as droplet break-up and surface oscillation were considered as scarce effects. Further verifications are inevitable even when the results suggest a high-efficiency extraction feasibility from larger droplets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高了真空中锂铅液滴的氘萃取效率
作者在聚变毯环中从液态锂-铅(LiPb)液滴中提取氚。我们在第15届核聚变技术国际研讨会(ISFNT15_2023)上报道了从直径1.89 mm的LiPb液滴中提取效率在0.6以上。尽管它仍然低于欧洲示范电厂(EU-DEMO)的设计标准0.8以上,这是公认的最低要求。此外,许多液滴喷嘴需要达到LiPb流量设计标准。因此,目的是提高效率和流量。增大液滴直径是提高流速的一种简单方法。然而,这降低了效率。为了解决这个缺点,我们考虑了串联提取方法,它由两个提取过程组成。在第一个过程中,溶解的氘在真空下从入口管道中部分填充的LiPb流中提取出来。第二种方法是传统的从水滴中提取。实验验证和理论分析是在安装在日本Toki国家聚变科学研究所的液态金属实验测试环路上进行的。采用了2.27 mm的液滴尺寸,比之前的1.89 mm的流量增加了1.44倍,以验证该工艺。得到的总体效率在0.75到0.95之间,超过了0.65到0.85的估计范围。喷嘴处成熟的湍流促进了液滴的释放,同时也促进了串联萃取。其他增强因素,如液滴破碎和表面振荡,被认为是稀缺的影响。即使结果表明从更大的液滴中高效提取可行,进一步的验证也是不可避免的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fusion Engineering and Design
Fusion Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
23.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers about experiments (both plasma and technology), theory, models, methods, and designs in areas relating to technology, engineering, and applied science aspects of magnetic and inertial fusion energy. Specific areas of interest include: MFE and IFE design studies for experiments and reactors; fusion nuclear technologies and materials, including blankets and shields; analysis of reactor plasmas; plasma heating, fuelling, and vacuum systems; drivers, targets, and special technologies for IFE, controls and diagnostics; fuel cycle analysis and tritium reprocessing and handling; operations and remote maintenance of reactors; safety, decommissioning, and waste management; economic and environmental analysis of components and systems.
期刊最新文献
Design and shielding performance analysis of a W/GdH2/W sandwich composite shielding material for fusion reactors Mechanical characterisation of ITER-specification tungsten using tensile and small punch testing methods Determination of plasma displacement in Thailand Tokamak-1 using the Toroidal Filament Model and Optical Boundary Reconstruction Parallelized real-time physics codes for plasma control on DIII-D Axial internal winding and insulation system implementation for the dummy coil of the circular electron-positron collider detector superconducting magnet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1