The utility of initial lactate for the quick sequential organ failure assessment (LqSOFA) for emergency septic patients

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.042
Saqer M. Althunayyan MBBS SBEM , Ahmed Abdullah Aledeny MBBS , Mohammed A. Malabarey MBBS , Ali Ibrahim Alshaqaqiq MBBS , Eyman Okbah Haj-Ali MBBS , Mhd Walid Alhomsi MBBS , Hagar Khaled Elgazar MBBS , Tamim S.M. Alrefaei MBBS , Saad Ali AlAsiri MBBS
{"title":"The utility of initial lactate for the quick sequential organ failure assessment (LqSOFA) for emergency septic patients","authors":"Saqer M. Althunayyan MBBS SBEM ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdullah Aledeny MBBS ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Malabarey MBBS ,&nbsp;Ali Ibrahim Alshaqaqiq MBBS ,&nbsp;Eyman Okbah Haj-Ali MBBS ,&nbsp;Mhd Walid Alhomsi MBBS ,&nbsp;Hagar Khaled Elgazar MBBS ,&nbsp;Tamim S.M. Alrefaei MBBS ,&nbsp;Saad Ali AlAsiri MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Lactate-enhanced Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (LqSOFA) has been identified as a tool for predicting sepsis outcomes. We evaluated the predictive power of the LqSOFA for adult patients suspected of having sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED). It was assessed as an indicator for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, the necessity for vasopressors, and mortality within 72 h. This was then compared with the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective, cohort observational study of suspected sepsis patients from four branches of Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group (HMG) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1 May 2022 to 30 April 2023. We calculated the initial LqSOFA and qSOFA for all patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve were evaluated for both LqSOFA and qSOFA scores (with ≥2 criteria) for each targeted outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included a total of 1274 patients, the majority of whom were males (754 (59.2 %)), with a mean age of 68.80 ± 17.9 years. LqSOFA demonstrated higher sensitivity for ICU admission, vasopressor requirement, and mortality (48 %, 68 %, and 76 % respectively) in comparison to qSOFA (30 %, 50 %, and 71 % respectively). However, the specificities of the LqSOFA score for ICU admission, vasopressor requirements, and mortality were lower (81 %, 71 %, and 67 % respectively) than those of the qSOFA score (89 %, 83 %, and 80 % respectively). The AUC of LqSOFA was greater than that of qSOFA for each outcome of interest but the difference was only statistically significant for mortality outcome (<em>p</em>-value &lt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LqSOFA exhibits strong predictive reliability compared to qSOFA. Prospective multiregional studies need to be conducted to validate LqSOFA's performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 118-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725001500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Lactate-enhanced Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (LqSOFA) has been identified as a tool for predicting sepsis outcomes. We evaluated the predictive power of the LqSOFA for adult patients suspected of having sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED). It was assessed as an indicator for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, the necessity for vasopressors, and mortality within 72 h. This was then compared with the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cohort observational study of suspected sepsis patients from four branches of Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group (HMG) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1 May 2022 to 30 April 2023. We calculated the initial LqSOFA and qSOFA for all patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve were evaluated for both LqSOFA and qSOFA scores (with ≥2 criteria) for each targeted outcome.

Results

The study included a total of 1274 patients, the majority of whom were males (754 (59.2 %)), with a mean age of 68.80 ± 17.9 years. LqSOFA demonstrated higher sensitivity for ICU admission, vasopressor requirement, and mortality (48 %, 68 %, and 76 % respectively) in comparison to qSOFA (30 %, 50 %, and 71 % respectively). However, the specificities of the LqSOFA score for ICU admission, vasopressor requirements, and mortality were lower (81 %, 71 %, and 67 % respectively) than those of the qSOFA score (89 %, 83 %, and 80 % respectively). The AUC of LqSOFA was greater than that of qSOFA for each outcome of interest but the difference was only statistically significant for mortality outcome (p-value <0.05).

Conclusion

LqSOFA exhibits strong predictive reliability compared to qSOFA. Prospective multiregional studies need to be conducted to validate LqSOFA's performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳酸初始值在脓毒症患者快速序期器官衰竭评估中的应用
乳酸增强快速顺序器官衰竭评估(LqSOFA)已被确定为预测败血症结果的工具。我们评估了LqSOFA对急诊科(ED)怀疑患有脓毒症的成年患者的预测能力。将其作为重症监护病房(ICU)入院、血管加压药物必要性和72小时内死亡率的指标进行评估。然后将其与快速顺序器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)进行比较。方法:研究人员对2022年5月1日至2023年4月30日沙特阿拉伯利雅得苏莱曼·哈比卜医生医疗集团(HMG)四个分支的疑似脓毒症患者进行了回顾性、队列观察研究。我们计算了所有患者的初始LqSOFA和qSOFA。对每个目标结局的LqSOFA和qSOFA评分(≥2个标准)的敏感性、特异性和受试者操作者特征(AUROC)曲线下的面积进行评估。结果共纳入1274例患者,男性居多(754例(59.2%)),平均年龄68.80±17.9岁。与qSOFA(分别为30%、50%和71%)相比,LqSOFA对ICU入院、血管加压素需求和死亡率的敏感性更高(分别为48%、68%和76%)。然而,与qSOFA评分(分别为89%、83%和80%)相比,LqSOFA评分在ICU入院、血管加压素需求和死亡率方面的特异性较低(分别为81%、71%和67%)。LqSOFA的AUC均大于qSOFA,但仅死亡率的AUC差异有统计学意义(p值<;0.05)。结论lqsofa较qSOFA具有较强的预测信度。需要进行前瞻性的多区域研究来验证LqSOFA的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Sudden-onset restless legs syndrome due to acute cerebral hemorrhage The role of serum subfatin levels in the diagnosis of epileptic seizures: A case-control study Evaluating maternal mortality, risk factors, and emergency c-section timing in polytrauma pregnant patients Best practices for critically ill patients boarding in the emergency department: A Delphi study Comparison of neck-extended and modified ramped positions for locating the cricothyroid membrane in obese anesthetized patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1