Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Combination Therapies: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1111/cts.70156
Linfeng Liu, Kaori Ambe, Mayu Onishi, Yuka Yoshii, Toshiaki Makino, Masahiro Tohkin
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Combination Therapies: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis","authors":"Linfeng Liu,&nbsp;Kaori Ambe,&nbsp;Mayu Onishi,&nbsp;Yuka Yoshii,&nbsp;Toshiaki Makino,&nbsp;Masahiro Tohkin","doi":"10.1111/cts.70156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs currently available to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the optimal combination therapy with methotrexate for treating RA remains unclear. We aimed to identify combination therapies with high-efficacy and safety by employing the Bayesian method in a network meta-analysis. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi web, and PMDA review reports and application materials through October 2020, and found 86 randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy outcome was the 50% improvement rate according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50), and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% credible intervals (CrIs) between each treatment, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score for each treatment to rank disease-modifying antirheumatic drug combinations. Individually, most disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs combined with methotrexate are more likely to achieve ACR50 than methotrexate monotherapy, with significant differences (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), whereas the incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different compared with methotrexate monotherapy (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Infliximab combined with methotrexate had the highest efficacy ranking (OR = 10.53, 95% CrI: [3.20, 42.87], SUCRA score: 0.884), and etanercept combined with methotrexate had the highest safety ranking (OR = 0.29, 95% CrI: [0.03, 2.04], SUCRA score: 0.893). Comprehensive cluster analysis revealed that the combination of etanercept, an Fc-fusion protein targeting tumor necrosis factor α, with methotrexate demonstrated higher efficacy and safety. These findings could support the selection of combination therapies for the treatment of RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70156","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs currently available to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the optimal combination therapy with methotrexate for treating RA remains unclear. We aimed to identify combination therapies with high-efficacy and safety by employing the Bayesian method in a network meta-analysis. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi web, and PMDA review reports and application materials through October 2020, and found 86 randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy outcome was the 50% improvement rate according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50), and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% credible intervals (CrIs) between each treatment, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score for each treatment to rank disease-modifying antirheumatic drug combinations. Individually, most disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs combined with methotrexate are more likely to achieve ACR50 than methotrexate monotherapy, with significant differences (p < 0.05), whereas the incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different compared with methotrexate monotherapy (p > 0.05). Infliximab combined with methotrexate had the highest efficacy ranking (OR = 10.53, 95% CrI: [3.20, 42.87], SUCRA score: 0.884), and etanercept combined with methotrexate had the highest safety ranking (OR = 0.29, 95% CrI: [0.03, 2.04], SUCRA score: 0.893). Comprehensive cluster analysis revealed that the combination of etanercept, an Fc-fusion protein targeting tumor necrosis factor α, with methotrexate demonstrated higher efficacy and safety. These findings could support the selection of combination therapies for the treatment of RA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目前有多种改变病情的抗风湿药物可用于治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)。然而,治疗类风湿关节炎的最佳甲氨蝶呤联合疗法仍不明确。我们的目的是通过网络荟萃分析中的贝叶斯方法,找出具有高效性和安全性的联合疗法。我们系统检索了截至2020年10月的PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、Ichushi web、PMDA审查报告和申请材料,发现了86项随机对照试验。根据美国风湿病学会标准(ACR50),主要疗效结局为50%的改善率,主要安全性结局为严重不良事件的发生率。我们计算了每种治疗方法之间的几率比(ORs)及其 95% 可信区间(CrIs),并计算了每种治疗方法的累积排名曲线下表面(SUCRA)得分,以便对疾病修饰抗风湿药组合进行排名。单独来看,大多数疾病修饰抗风湿药联合甲氨蝶呤比甲氨蝶呤单药治疗更有可能达到 ACR50,差异显著(p <0.05),而严重不良事件的发生率与甲氨蝶呤单药治疗相比无显著差异(p >0.05)。英夫利西单抗联合甲氨蝶呤的疗效排名最高(OR = 10.53,95% CrI:[3.20, 42.87],SUCRA 评分:0.884),依那西普联合甲氨蝶呤的安全性排名最高(OR = 0.29,95% CrI:[0.03, 2.04],SUCRA 评分:0.893)。综合聚类分析显示,靶向肿瘤坏死因子α的Fc融合蛋白依那西普(etanercept)与甲氨蝶呤的联合用药具有更高的疗效和安全性。这些发现有助于选择联合疗法来治疗RA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Agents for Change: Artificial Intelligent Workflows for Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Sciences Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of KT-474, a Novel Selective Interleukin-1 Receptor–Associated Kinase 4 (IRAK4) Degrader, in Healthy Adults The Impact of Heart Rate Reduction From Individual Baseline With Propranolol for Primary and Secondary Prophylaxis of Variceal Hemorrhage in Cirrhosis Evaluation of Innate Immune System, Body Habitus, and Sex on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anetumab Ravtansine in Patients With Cancer Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Miriplatin Without the Need for Hydration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1