How do adults with a learning disability construct their relationships with support workers? A Foucauldian discourse analysis

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1111/1467-6427.12489
Sinead Peacock-Brennan
{"title":"How do adults with a learning disability construct their relationships with support workers? A Foucauldian discourse analysis","authors":"Sinead Peacock-Brennan","doi":"10.1111/1467-6427.12489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The research was conducted as part of a master's degree in systemic psychotherapy. It was informed by my developing systemic practice alongside my work as a clinical psychologist in a community learning disability service. Data was collected from semi-structured interviews transcribed near verbatim and analysed using Foucauldian discourse analysis. The analytic process considered discursive objects, wider discourse, action orientation, subject positions and subjectivity. Five constructions of the support worker relationship are presented, namely, the support worker relationship as professional, equal and shared, a thing that can be bought with money, a family and being watched/protected. These constructions were drawn from discourses regarding professionalism, independence, the law, equality and humanity, industry and economy, parenting and longevity, and impairment. Some constructions matched those in the literature. The list of constructions could be used as a therapeutic tool to consider how constructions might utilise different discourses to enable meanings, practices and positions to be adopted or abandoned.</p>","PeriodicalId":51575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Therapy","volume":"47 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6427.12489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research was conducted as part of a master's degree in systemic psychotherapy. It was informed by my developing systemic practice alongside my work as a clinical psychologist in a community learning disability service. Data was collected from semi-structured interviews transcribed near verbatim and analysed using Foucauldian discourse analysis. The analytic process considered discursive objects, wider discourse, action orientation, subject positions and subjectivity. Five constructions of the support worker relationship are presented, namely, the support worker relationship as professional, equal and shared, a thing that can be bought with money, a family and being watched/protected. These constructions were drawn from discourses regarding professionalism, independence, the law, equality and humanity, industry and economy, parenting and longevity, and impairment. Some constructions matched those in the literature. The list of constructions could be used as a therapeutic tool to consider how constructions might utilise different discourses to enable meanings, practices and positions to be adopted or abandoned.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有学习障碍的成年人如何与支持工作者建立关系?福柯式话语分析
这项研究是作为系统心理治疗硕士学位的一部分进行的。这是我作为一名临床心理学家在社区学习障碍服务中心开展的系统实践的结果。数据收集自近乎逐字记录的半结构化访谈,并使用福柯语篇分析进行分析。分析过程考虑了话语对象、更广泛的话语、行动取向、主体位置和主体性。提出了支持工作者关系的五种构建,即支持工作者关系是专业的、平等的、共享的、可以用钱买到的、家庭的、被监视/保护的。这些建构来源于专业、独立、法律、平等与人性、工业与经济、养育与长寿、损伤等话语。有些结构与文献中的相符。结构列表可以作为一种治疗工具来考虑结构如何利用不同的话语来实现意义、实践和立场的采用或放弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Therapy advances the understanding and treatment of human relationships constituted in systems such as couples, families and professional networks and wider groups, by publishing articles on theory, research, clinical practice and training. The editorial board includes leading academics and professionals from around the world in keeping with the high standard of international contributions, which make it one of the most widely read family therapy journals.
期刊最新文献
Systemic Therapy Through a Pixelated Lens: Using Minecraft in Therapy With Families That Include Autistic Children and Children With ADHD Therapeutic Work in the Shadow of Collective Trauma: Reflections With Colleagues at a Resilience Centre in Southern Israel Transitioning Between Treatment for Eating Disorders in Adolescent and Adult Mental Health Services: The Role of Family and Motivation Relational Reflexivity in Dialogical Family Therapy: Exploring Linguistic Practices and Responses in Reflecting Team Dialogues Examining the Tuning in to Kids Parenting Programme With Turkish Military Fathers and Their Partners of 4- to 6-Year-Old Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1