Trends in Sex Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Nationwide US Cohort Study

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American Journal of Kidney Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.12.008
Jessica L. Harding , Chengcheng Hu , Stephen O. Pastan , Ana Rossi , Rachel E. Patzer
{"title":"Trends in Sex Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Nationwide US Cohort Study","authors":"Jessica L. Harding ,&nbsp;Chengcheng Hu ,&nbsp;Stephen O. Pastan ,&nbsp;Ana Rossi ,&nbsp;Rachel E. Patzer","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Women with kidney failure have reduced access to kidney transplantation compared with men. We examined trends in sex inequities in access to transplantation over time.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><div>2.3 million adults identified within the US Renal Data System, aged 18-79 years, who initiated kidney replacement therapy (KRT) between 1997 and 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Era of KRT (1997-2000, 2001-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2012, 2013-2016, or 2017-2020), sex (male or female).</div></div><div><h3>Outcome</h3><div>Placement onto the kidney transplant waitlist, or living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) among all individuals initiating KRT, and deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) among patients on the waitlist.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Multivariable cause-specific hazard models to analyze the association between sex and placement onto the waitlist, LDKT, and DDKT, by era, overall, and by categories of age, race, and cause of kidney failure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sex inequities in waitlisting became less pronounced over time. During 1997-2000 the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.83); by 2017-2020, it had narrowed to 0.86 (95% CI, 0.85-0.87). For the outcome of LDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.82). For the outcome of DDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.14-1.19). Sex inequities in waitlisting and LDKT were greatest in women (vs men) with diabetes (27% and 37%, respectively, in 2017-2020) and older adults 60-79 years (24% and 34%, respectively, in 2017-2020), but were broadly similar across race groups.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Residual confounding; unknown true medical eligibility for transplant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Since 1997, sex inequities in waitlisting have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older and who have diabetes-attributed kidney failure. Worsening sex inequities in LDKT among women and DDKT among waitlisted men warrant further study.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Women with kidney failure have historically had poorer access to kidney transplantation than men. The goal of the current study was to see whether access to transplantation, defined as placement onto the transplant waitlist or living (LDKT) or deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), has changed over time using national registry data from<!--> <!-->&gt;2.3 million adults initiating kidney replacement therapy in the United States. Overall, this study showed that since 1997 sex inequities in placement on the transplant waitlist have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older or have diabetes. Unfortunately, sex inequities in LDKT favoring men have worsened over time while declines in DDKT appear to have impacted men more than women. These findings have implications for the design of policies and interventions to improve transplant equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":"86 1","pages":"Pages 18-31.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638625007048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & Objective

Women with kidney failure have reduced access to kidney transplantation compared with men. We examined trends in sex inequities in access to transplantation over time.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants

2.3 million adults identified within the US Renal Data System, aged 18-79 years, who initiated kidney replacement therapy (KRT) between 1997 and 2020.

Exposure

Era of KRT (1997-2000, 2001-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2012, 2013-2016, or 2017-2020), sex (male or female).

Outcome

Placement onto the kidney transplant waitlist, or living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) among all individuals initiating KRT, and deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) among patients on the waitlist.

Analytical Approach

Multivariable cause-specific hazard models to analyze the association between sex and placement onto the waitlist, LDKT, and DDKT, by era, overall, and by categories of age, race, and cause of kidney failure.

Results

Sex inequities in waitlisting became less pronounced over time. During 1997-2000 the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.83); by 2017-2020, it had narrowed to 0.86 (95% CI, 0.85-0.87). For the outcome of LDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.82). For the outcome of DDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.14-1.19). Sex inequities in waitlisting and LDKT were greatest in women (vs men) with diabetes (27% and 37%, respectively, in 2017-2020) and older adults 60-79 years (24% and 34%, respectively, in 2017-2020), but were broadly similar across race groups.

Limitations

Residual confounding; unknown true medical eligibility for transplant.

Conclusions

Since 1997, sex inequities in waitlisting have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older and who have diabetes-attributed kidney failure. Worsening sex inequities in LDKT among women and DDKT among waitlisted men warrant further study.

Plain-Language Summary

Women with kidney failure have historically had poorer access to kidney transplantation than men. The goal of the current study was to see whether access to transplantation, defined as placement onto the transplant waitlist or living (LDKT) or deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), has changed over time using national registry data from >2.3 million adults initiating kidney replacement therapy in the United States. Overall, this study showed that since 1997 sex inequities in placement on the transplant waitlist have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older or have diabetes. Unfortunately, sex inequities in LDKT favoring men have worsened over time while declines in DDKT appear to have impacted men more than women. These findings have implications for the design of policies and interventions to improve transplant equity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得肾移植的性别差异趋势:一项美国全国队列研究。
理由与目的:与男性相比,患有肾衰竭的女性接受肾移植的机会较少。随着时间的推移,我们研究了移植手术中性别不平等的趋势。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。环境和参与者:在美国肾脏数据系统中确定的230万成年人,年龄在18-79岁,在1997年至2020年期间开始肾脏替代治疗(KRT)。暴露:KRT时代(1997-2000年,2001-2004年,2005-2008年,2009-2012年,2013-2016年或2017-2020年),性别(男女)。结果:在所有启动KRT的个体中进入肾移植等待名单或LDKT,在等待名单上的患者中进入DDKT。分析方法:多变量病因特异性风险模型,分析性别与排在等待名单、LDKT和DDKT之间的关系,按年龄、总体、年龄、种族和肾衰竭原因分类。结果:随着时间的推移,候补名单中的性别不平等变得不那么明显了。1997-2000年期间,男性与女性的调整风险比为0.81;95%CI:[0.79-0.83]),到2017-2020年,缩小至0.86[0.85-0.87])。对于LDKT的结果,在1997-2000年期间,男性与女性的调整风险比为0.89[0.85-0.93],到2017-2020年,扩大到0.79[0.76-0.82])。对于DDKT的结果,在1997-2000年期间,男性与女性的调整风险比为(0.92[0.89-0.95]),到2017-2020年,扩大到(1.16[1.14-1.19])。在女性糖尿病患者(2017-2020年分别为27%和37%)和60-79岁的老年人(2017-2020年分别为24%和34%)中,等待名单和LDKT的性别不平等最大,但在种族群体中大致相似。局限性:残留混淆;移植的真实医学资格未知。结论:自1997年以来,等待名单上的性别不平等有所改善,但仍然很明显,特别是对于年龄较大和糖尿病导致肾衰竭的女性。女性LDKT和候选男性DDKT的性别不平等加剧值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
期刊最新文献
The Roles of A Proliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL) and B-Cell Activating Factor (BAFF) in IgA Nephropathy. Kidney and Cardiovascular Protection in Diabetes: Beyond Diabetes Typology. Nephrology Leadership Through Collaboration to Deliver on CKD Care. Acute Kidney Injury in a Patient With Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma: A Quiz. Anticoagulation Decisions in Patients With Kidney Failure Requiring Hemodialysis: Caught Between a Clot and a Hard Place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1