Jessica L. Harding , Chengcheng Hu , Stephen O. Pastan , Ana Rossi , Rachel E. Patzer
{"title":"Trends in Sex Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplantation: A Nationwide US Cohort Study","authors":"Jessica L. Harding , Chengcheng Hu , Stephen O. Pastan , Ana Rossi , Rachel E. Patzer","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale & Objective</h3><div>Women with kidney failure have reduced access to kidney transplantation compared with men. We examined trends in sex inequities in access to transplantation over time.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting & Participants</h3><div>2.3 million adults identified within the US Renal Data System, aged 18-79 years, who initiated kidney replacement therapy (KRT) between 1997 and 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Era of KRT (1997-2000, 2001-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2012, 2013-2016, or 2017-2020), sex (male or female).</div></div><div><h3>Outcome</h3><div>Placement onto the kidney transplant waitlist, or living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) among all individuals initiating KRT, and deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) among patients on the waitlist.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Multivariable cause-specific hazard models to analyze the association between sex and placement onto the waitlist, LDKT, and DDKT, by era, overall, and by categories of age, race, and cause of kidney failure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sex inequities in waitlisting became less pronounced over time. During 1997-2000 the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.83); by 2017-2020, it had narrowed to 0.86 (95% CI, 0.85-0.87). For the outcome of LDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.82). For the outcome of DDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.14-1.19). Sex inequities in waitlisting and LDKT were greatest in women (vs men) with diabetes (27% and 37%, respectively, in 2017-2020) and older adults 60-79 years (24% and 34%, respectively, in 2017-2020), but were broadly similar across race groups.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Residual confounding; unknown true medical eligibility for transplant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Since 1997, sex inequities in waitlisting have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older and who have diabetes-attributed kidney failure. Worsening sex inequities in LDKT among women and DDKT among waitlisted men warrant further study.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Women with kidney failure have historically had poorer access to kidney transplantation than men. The goal of the current study was to see whether access to transplantation, defined as placement onto the transplant waitlist or living (LDKT) or deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), has changed over time using national registry data from<!--> <!-->>2.3 million adults initiating kidney replacement therapy in the United States. Overall, this study showed that since 1997 sex inequities in placement on the transplant waitlist have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older or have diabetes. Unfortunately, sex inequities in LDKT favoring men have worsened over time while declines in DDKT appear to have impacted men more than women. These findings have implications for the design of policies and interventions to improve transplant equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":"86 1","pages":"Pages 18-31.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638625007048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale & Objective
Women with kidney failure have reduced access to kidney transplantation compared with men. We examined trends in sex inequities in access to transplantation over time.
Study Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting & Participants
2.3 million adults identified within the US Renal Data System, aged 18-79 years, who initiated kidney replacement therapy (KRT) between 1997 and 2020.
Exposure
Era of KRT (1997-2000, 2001-2004, 2005-2008, 2009-2012, 2013-2016, or 2017-2020), sex (male or female).
Outcome
Placement onto the kidney transplant waitlist, or living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) among all individuals initiating KRT, and deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) among patients on the waitlist.
Analytical Approach
Multivariable cause-specific hazard models to analyze the association between sex and placement onto the waitlist, LDKT, and DDKT, by era, overall, and by categories of age, race, and cause of kidney failure.
Results
Sex inequities in waitlisting became less pronounced over time. During 1997-2000 the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.83); by 2017-2020, it had narrowed to 0.86 (95% CI, 0.85-0.87). For the outcome of LDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.82). For the outcome of DDKT, during 1997-2000, the adjusted HR comparing men with women was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95) and by 2017-2020 had widened to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.14-1.19). Sex inequities in waitlisting and LDKT were greatest in women (vs men) with diabetes (27% and 37%, respectively, in 2017-2020) and older adults 60-79 years (24% and 34%, respectively, in 2017-2020), but were broadly similar across race groups.
Limitations
Residual confounding; unknown true medical eligibility for transplant.
Conclusions
Since 1997, sex inequities in waitlisting have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older and who have diabetes-attributed kidney failure. Worsening sex inequities in LDKT among women and DDKT among waitlisted men warrant further study.
Plain-Language Summary
Women with kidney failure have historically had poorer access to kidney transplantation than men. The goal of the current study was to see whether access to transplantation, defined as placement onto the transplant waitlist or living (LDKT) or deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT), has changed over time using national registry data from >2.3 million adults initiating kidney replacement therapy in the United States. Overall, this study showed that since 1997 sex inequities in placement on the transplant waitlist have improved but remain significant, especially for women who are older or have diabetes. Unfortunately, sex inequities in LDKT favoring men have worsened over time while declines in DDKT appear to have impacted men more than women. These findings have implications for the design of policies and interventions to improve transplant equity.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.