Understanding Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): a comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis compared to MI with the Obstructive Coronary Artery (MIOCA).

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1186/s12872-025-04504-2
Nahid Khorasani, Yaser Mohammadi, Mahdiye Sarpoli, Toba Kazemi, Seyed Mohammad Riahi
{"title":"Understanding Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): a comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis compared to MI with the Obstructive Coronary Artery (MIOCA).","authors":"Nahid Khorasani, Yaser Mohammadi, Mahdiye Sarpoli, Toba Kazemi, Seyed Mohammad Riahi","doi":"10.1186/s12872-025-04504-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MINOCA (Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries) represents a unique subset of acute coronary syndrome, distinct from MIOCA (Myocardial Infarction with Obstructive Coronary Arteries) and a control group. This study systematically compares their prevalence, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes to improve understanding and treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines across multiple databases up to 2024. STATA 17 was used for statistical analyses, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred and twelve studies, including 5,908,768 patients, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of MINOCA among patients undergoing coronary angiography was 8.92% (95% CI: 8.90-8.94). MINOCA patients were generally younger, predominantly female, and more likely to present with atypical chest pain and dyspnea compared to MIOCA patients. Laboratory findings showed higher levels of CRP, BNP, and fibrinogen in MINOCA patients, suggesting inflammation and microvascular dysfunction as key mechanisms. In contrast, MIOCA patients had higher rates of diabetes and dyslipidemia, highlighting differences in pathophysiological processes. Medication use differed between the groups, with MINOCA patients more likely to be prescribed anticoagulants and β-blockers. Prognostically, MINOCA patients experienced significantly lower rates of adverse short- and long-term outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and cardiovascular death, compared to MIOCA patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that patients with MINOCA have a better prognosis compared to those with MIOCA and are at a lower risk of serious cardiac events. Based on the findings of this study, we emphasize that microcirculation and vascular spasm are the main mechanisms involved in MINOCA. Considering these findings, it is suggested that a better management strategy for MINOCA patients can be established by precisely defining diagnostic criteria and focusing on anti-inflammatory treatments and risk factor control.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-025-04504-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: MINOCA (Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries) represents a unique subset of acute coronary syndrome, distinct from MIOCA (Myocardial Infarction with Obstructive Coronary Arteries) and a control group. This study systematically compares their prevalence, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes to improve understanding and treatment approaches.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines across multiple databases up to 2024. STATA 17 was used for statistical analyses, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to assess study quality.

Results: One-hundred and twelve studies, including 5,908,768 patients, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of MINOCA among patients undergoing coronary angiography was 8.92% (95% CI: 8.90-8.94). MINOCA patients were generally younger, predominantly female, and more likely to present with atypical chest pain and dyspnea compared to MIOCA patients. Laboratory findings showed higher levels of CRP, BNP, and fibrinogen in MINOCA patients, suggesting inflammation and microvascular dysfunction as key mechanisms. In contrast, MIOCA patients had higher rates of diabetes and dyslipidemia, highlighting differences in pathophysiological processes. Medication use differed between the groups, with MINOCA patients more likely to be prescribed anticoagulants and β-blockers. Prognostically, MINOCA patients experienced significantly lower rates of adverse short- and long-term outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and cardiovascular death, compared to MIOCA patients.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that patients with MINOCA have a better prognosis compared to those with MIOCA and are at a lower risk of serious cardiac events. Based on the findings of this study, we emphasize that microcirculation and vascular spasm are the main mechanisms involved in MINOCA. Considering these findings, it is suggested that a better management strategy for MINOCA patients can be established by precisely defining diagnostic criteria and focusing on anti-inflammatory treatments and risk factor control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解非梗阻性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA):与梗阻性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MIOCA)相比,临床特征、管理和预后的综合meta分析。
背景:MINOCA(非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死)代表了急性冠状动脉综合征的一个独特亚群,与MIOCA(阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死)和对照组不同。本研究系统地比较了它们的患病率、临床特征、管理策略和结果,以提高认识和治疗方法。方法:该系统综述和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南,跨越多个数据库,直至2024年。采用STATA 17进行统计分析,并采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。结果:共分析了112项研究,包括5908768例患者。接受冠状动脉造影的患者中MINOCA的总患病率为8.92% (95% CI: 8.90-8.94)。与MIOCA患者相比,MINOCA患者通常更年轻,以女性为主,更容易出现非典型胸痛和呼吸困难。实验室结果显示,MINOCA患者CRP、BNP和纤维蛋白原水平较高,提示炎症和微血管功能障碍是关键机制。相比之下,MIOCA患者有更高的糖尿病和血脂异常发生率,突出了病理生理过程的差异。两组之间的药物使用情况不同,MINOCA患者更有可能服用抗凝血剂和β受体阻滞剂。预后方面,与MIOCA患者相比,MINOCA患者的不良短期和长期结局发生率显著降低,包括主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和心血管死亡。结论:本研究表明,与MIOCA患者相比,MINOCA患者预后更好,发生严重心脏事件的风险更低。基于本研究结果,我们强调微循环和血管痉挛是参与MINOCA的主要机制。考虑到这些发现,建议通过精确定义诊断标准,注重抗炎治疗和危险因素控制,建立更好的MINOCA患者管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in mitral stenosis surgery. Red blood cell distribution width-albumin ratio as predictor of mortality in patients with cardiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Discriminating established cardiovascular disease using a novel multiterritory ultrasound plaque burden measure (wTPT): findings from the P-SONAR study. Sex-specific associations of physical frailty with cardiac structure and function: a cross-sectional study based on UK Biobank. The impact of misdiagnosed heart failure and cardiac or extra-cardiac disease burden on the prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1