External quality assessment of the manual tilt tube technique for prothrombin time testing: a report from the IFCC-SSC/ISTH Working Group on the Standardization of PT/INR.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-03 Print Date: 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1515/cclm-2024-1446
Claudia van Rijn, Charmane Abdoel, Shanti Baktawar, Petra Herbel, Anja Jünschke, Michelle Bryant, Steve Kitchen, Erica Scalambrino, Marigrazia Clerici, Anne Stavelin, Piet Meijer, Christa M Cobbaert, Antonius M H P van den Besselaar
{"title":"External quality assessment of the manual tilt tube technique for prothrombin time testing: a report from the IFCC-SSC/ISTH Working Group on the Standardization of PT/INR.","authors":"Claudia van Rijn, Charmane Abdoel, Shanti Baktawar, Petra Herbel, Anja Jünschke, Michelle Bryant, Steve Kitchen, Erica Scalambrino, Marigrazia Clerici, Anne Stavelin, Piet Meijer, Christa M Cobbaert, Antonius M H P van den Besselaar","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Detailed technical instructions have been made for harmonization of the prothrombin time (PT) test using the manual tilt tube technique (MTT). The MTT has been proposed as the reference measurement procedure for PT and international normalized ratio (INR). An external quality assessment (EQA) scheme has been developed specifically for calibration laboratories performing the harmonized MTT. Here we report the results of the first 10 surveys of this new EQA scheme and investigate whether there is improvement in performance over time and in comparison with previous studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four deep-frozen plasma samples with different PT levels were dispatched to 4 European laboratories. PT's were determined by eight operators. All operators used the same PT reagent (recombinant human). Various measures of PT variation were defined, i.e. within-operator, within-survey, within-run, between-operator, and between-survey coefficient of variation. Between-operator variation (CV<sub>S</sub>) was calculated from the each operator's mean PT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median within-operator variation of all operators varied from 1.3 to 2.3 %. Some operators improved their performance, others did not. Between-operator CV (CV<sub>S</sub>) ranged from 1.0 to 2.2 %. Overall, the between-operator and within-operator variation using the harmonized MTT was lower than in a previously published multicentre calibration study. Overall, the within-operator variation was low and did not change significantly over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>within-operator and between-operator variation of the PT measured with the harmonized MTT were low when compared with previous studies. The results suggest that the average within-operator variation of the eight operators in this study is as low as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1327-1335"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Detailed technical instructions have been made for harmonization of the prothrombin time (PT) test using the manual tilt tube technique (MTT). The MTT has been proposed as the reference measurement procedure for PT and international normalized ratio (INR). An external quality assessment (EQA) scheme has been developed specifically for calibration laboratories performing the harmonized MTT. Here we report the results of the first 10 surveys of this new EQA scheme and investigate whether there is improvement in performance over time and in comparison with previous studies.

Methods: Four deep-frozen plasma samples with different PT levels were dispatched to 4 European laboratories. PT's were determined by eight operators. All operators used the same PT reagent (recombinant human). Various measures of PT variation were defined, i.e. within-operator, within-survey, within-run, between-operator, and between-survey coefficient of variation. Between-operator variation (CVS) was calculated from the each operator's mean PT.

Results: The median within-operator variation of all operators varied from 1.3 to 2.3 %. Some operators improved their performance, others did not. Between-operator CV (CVS) ranged from 1.0 to 2.2 %. Overall, the between-operator and within-operator variation using the harmonized MTT was lower than in a previously published multicentre calibration study. Overall, the within-operator variation was low and did not change significantly over time.

Conclusions: within-operator and between-operator variation of the PT measured with the harmonized MTT were low when compared with previous studies. The results suggest that the average within-operator variation of the eight operators in this study is as low as possible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工倾斜管技术用于凝血酶原时间检测的外部质量评估:IFCC-SSC/ISTH PT/INR标准化工作组的报告
目的:为统一使用手动倾斜试管技术(MTT)进行凝血酶原时间(PT)检测,制定了详细的技术说明。已建议将 MTT 作为 PT 和国际正常化比值(INR)的参考测量程序。专门为执行统一 MTT 的校准实验室制定了外部质量评估(EQA)计划。在此,我们报告了这一新的 EQA 计划的前 10 次调查结果,并研究了随着时间的推移以及与以前的研究相比,其性能是否有所提高:方法:4 份具有不同 PT 水平的深冻血浆样本被送往 4 个欧洲实验室。PT 由 8 名操作员测定。所有操作人员使用相同的 PT 试剂(重组人)。对 PT 变异的各种测量方法进行了定义,即操作员内变异系数、调查内变异系数、运行内变异系数、操作员间变异系数和调查间变异系数。根据每个操作员的平均 PT 计算出操作员之间的变异系数(CVS):所有操作员的操作员内变异系数中位数从 1.3% 到 2.3% 不等。有些操作员的成绩有所提高,有些则没有。操作员之间的 CV (CVS) 在 1.0% 到 2.2% 之间。总体而言,使用统一 MTT 的操作员之间和操作员内部的差异低于之前公布的多中心校准研究。结论:与之前的研究相比,使用统一 MTT 测量的 PT 在操作者内部和操作者之间的变化较小。结果表明,本研究中八名操作员的平均操作员内变异尽可能低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
期刊最新文献
Impact of sample size and data origin on the simulation-based analytical performance specification derivation. Assessing the performance of EWMA and CUSUM algorithms in patient-based real-time quality control of electrolytes. A suspicious increase in plasma creatinine: mind the interference. A scientific comparison of the EFLM Vision and RiskGATOR software: a unified path towards value-based, patient-centered laboratory medicine. Measurement units harmonization: "Unity in Units".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1