Long-Term Seizure Outcomes After Extended Resection of Low-Grade Epilepsy-Associated Neuroepithelial Tumors

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123836
Masafumi Fukuda , Hiroshi Masuda , Hiroshi Shirozu , Yosuke Ito , Tomoyoshi Ota , Makoto Oishi
{"title":"Long-Term Seizure Outcomes After Extended Resection of Low-Grade Epilepsy-Associated Neuroepithelial Tumors","authors":"Masafumi Fukuda ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Masuda ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Shirozu ,&nbsp;Yosuke Ito ,&nbsp;Tomoyoshi Ota ,&nbsp;Makoto Oishi","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Although most patients with low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors (LEATs) achieve satisfactory long-term postoperative seizure control, optimal surgical strategies remain undefined. We employed subdural electrode implantation and extended resection, including the tumor and surrounding cortices, in patients with LEATs to assess whether this approach improved seizure outcomes over a 10-year postoperative follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-five patients (26 men, 19 women) who underwent LEAT removal, with ≥2 years of follow-up, were included, and 34 (75.6%) showed temporal lobe tumors. In 30 (66.7%) patients, intracranial subdural electrodes were implanted, and video electroencephalography was performed. Seizure outcomes were classified using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria. Clinical variables independently associated with seizure-free (ILAE class I and Ia) outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median postoperative follow-up was 117.6 (range, 24–319) months. At the final follow-up, 36 (80.0%) of 45 patients were seizure-free. Although 62.2% patients were seizure-free (ILAE class I and Ia) 1 year after surgery, the 4- and 5-year seizure-free rates were significantly higher; this indicated a running-down phenomenon. Univariate analysis showed significantly higher seizure-free rates for patients with temporal lobe tumors than for those with extra-temporal lobe tumors. Multivariate analysis confirmed tumor location as the only variable significantly correlated with seizure outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Extended resection of the LEAT and surrounding tissue resulted in an 80% seizure-free rate at an average of 10 years after surgery. Outcomes were more favorable for temporal than for extra-temporal lobe tumors. Patients with LEATs may experience a running-down phenomenon for several years postoperatively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 123836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025001925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Although most patients with low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors (LEATs) achieve satisfactory long-term postoperative seizure control, optimal surgical strategies remain undefined. We employed subdural electrode implantation and extended resection, including the tumor and surrounding cortices, in patients with LEATs to assess whether this approach improved seizure outcomes over a 10-year postoperative follow-up.

Methods

Forty-five patients (26 men, 19 women) who underwent LEAT removal, with ≥2 years of follow-up, were included, and 34 (75.6%) showed temporal lobe tumors. In 30 (66.7%) patients, intracranial subdural electrodes were implanted, and video electroencephalography was performed. Seizure outcomes were classified using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria. Clinical variables independently associated with seizure-free (ILAE class I and Ia) outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The median postoperative follow-up was 117.6 (range, 24–319) months. At the final follow-up, 36 (80.0%) of 45 patients were seizure-free. Although 62.2% patients were seizure-free (ILAE class I and Ia) 1 year after surgery, the 4- and 5-year seizure-free rates were significantly higher; this indicated a running-down phenomenon. Univariate analysis showed significantly higher seizure-free rates for patients with temporal lobe tumors than for those with extra-temporal lobe tumors. Multivariate analysis confirmed tumor location as the only variable significantly correlated with seizure outcomes.

Conclusions

Extended resection of the LEAT and surrounding tissue resulted in an 80% seizure-free rate at an average of 10 years after surgery. Outcomes were more favorable for temporal than for extra-temporal lobe tumors. Patients with LEATs may experience a running-down phenomenon for several years postoperatively.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低度癫痫相关神经上皮肿瘤扩大切除术后癫痫发作的长期预后。
虽然大多数低级别癫痫相关神经上皮肿瘤(LEATs)患者术后长期发作控制令人满意,但最佳手术策略仍不明确。我们在LEATs患者中采用硬膜下电极植入和扩大切除,包括肿瘤和周围皮质,以评估该方法是否改善了10年术后随访的癫痫发作结果。45例患者(26男,19女)行LEAT切除术,随访≥2年,其中34例(75.6%)出现颞叶肿瘤。在30例(66.7%)患者中,植入颅内硬膜下电极,并进行视频脑电图。癫痫发作结局采用国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)标准进行分类。使用单变量和多变量分析确定与无癫痫发作(ILAE I级和Ia级)结果独立相关的临床变量。术后中位随访117.6个月(范围24-319个月)。最后随访时,45例患者中36例(80.0%)无癫痫发作。62.2%的患者术后1年无癫痫发作(ILAE I级和Ia级),但术后4年和5年无癫痫发作率明显高于对照组;这表明了一种损耗现象。单变量分析显示,颞叶肿瘤患者的无癫痫发作率明显高于颞叶外肿瘤患者。多因素分析证实肿瘤位置是唯一与癫痫发作结果显著相关的变量。延长切除LEAT和周围组织,术后平均10年无癫痫发作率为80%。颞叶肿瘤的预后优于颞叶外肿瘤。leat患者术后可能会经历数年的衰竭现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
The Baylor Score for Prognosticating Cranial Gunshot Wounds: Clinical Application and Nuances Clinical Predictors of 90-Day Mortality After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Lattice versus Pipeline and Tubridge Flow Diverters for Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Retrospective Cohort Study Multivariable Analysis-Based Risk Prediction Model for Intracranial Hematoma Expansion in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Early Increase in Perihematomal Edema Volume after Intracerebral Hemorrhage Is an Independent Predictor of 90-Day Poor Functional Outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1