Psychometric Testing of the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) in Patients With Heart Failure and Coronary Heart Disease.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1002/nur.22440
Ashmita Thapa, Mary Kay Rayens, Misook Lee Chung, Martha J Biddle, Jia-Rong Wu, Chin-Yen Lin, JungHee Kang, Debra K Moser
{"title":"Psychometric Testing of the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) in Patients With Heart Failure and Coronary Heart Disease.","authors":"Ashmita Thapa, Mary Kay Rayens, Misook Lee Chung, Martha J Biddle, Jia-Rong Wu, Chin-Yen Lin, JungHee Kang, Debra K Moser","doi":"10.1002/nur.22440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The social determinants of health (SDOH) have been recognized as an important contributor to an individual's health status. A valid and reliable instrument is needed for researchers and clinicians to measure SDOH. However, there is considerable variability in the screening methodologies, as well as a lack of standardization in definitions and methods for capturing and reporting SDOH data for both electronic health record software vendors and national experts on SDOH. The Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) is a commonly used instrument for measuring SDOH. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the PRAPARE instrument in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and heart failure (HF), focusing on its reliability and validity for assessing SDOH. We assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity using data from 234 patients with CHD and/or HF recruited from outpatient clinics in Kentucky. The PRAPARE instrument demonstrated high internal consistency (KR-20 score: 0.76) and test-retest reliability (correlation coefficient: 0.88). Factor analysis identified three distinct factors (Factor I: basic necessities and services, Factor II: housing and personal well-being, and Factor III: insurance, education, and work situation) of SDOH. PRAPARE scores were significantly correlated with depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 scores) and functional outcomes of sleep (FOSQ-10 scores). PRAPARE is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing SDOH in patients with CHD and HF, highlighting its potential for clinical and research applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":"48 2","pages":"190-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The social determinants of health (SDOH) have been recognized as an important contributor to an individual's health status. A valid and reliable instrument is needed for researchers and clinicians to measure SDOH. However, there is considerable variability in the screening methodologies, as well as a lack of standardization in definitions and methods for capturing and reporting SDOH data for both electronic health record software vendors and national experts on SDOH. The Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patient Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE) is a commonly used instrument for measuring SDOH. We evaluated the psychometric properties of the PRAPARE instrument in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and heart failure (HF), focusing on its reliability and validity for assessing SDOH. We assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity using data from 234 patients with CHD and/or HF recruited from outpatient clinics in Kentucky. The PRAPARE instrument demonstrated high internal consistency (KR-20 score: 0.76) and test-retest reliability (correlation coefficient: 0.88). Factor analysis identified three distinct factors (Factor I: basic necessities and services, Factor II: housing and personal well-being, and Factor III: insurance, education, and work situation) of SDOH. PRAPARE scores were significantly correlated with depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 scores) and functional outcomes of sleep (FOSQ-10 scores). PRAPARE is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing SDOH in patients with CHD and HF, highlighting its potential for clinical and research applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心衰和冠心病患者资产、风险和经历(PRAPARE)响应和评估方案的心理测量测试
健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)已被认为是影响个人健康状况的一个重要因素。研究人员和临床医生需要一种有效可靠的仪器来测量SDOH。然而,对于电子健康记录软件供应商和国家SDOH专家而言,筛查方法存在相当大的差异,并且在捕获和报告SDOH数据的定义和方法方面缺乏标准化。应对和评估患者资产、风险和经验的方案(PRAPARE)是衡量SDOH的常用工具。我们评估了PRAPARE仪器在冠心病(CHD)和心力衰竭(HF)患者中的心理测量特性,重点关注其评估SDOH的信度和效度。我们使用从肯塔基州门诊招募的234例冠心病和/或心衰患者的数据,评估了内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。PRAPARE仪器具有较高的内部一致性(KR-20评分:0.76)和重测信度(相关系数:0.88)。因子分析确定了影响SDOH的三个不同因素(因子1:基本必需品和服务,因子2:住房和个人福祉,因子3:保险、教育和工作状况)。PRAPARE评分与抑郁症状(PHQ-9评分)和睡眠功能结局(foq -10评分)显著相关。PRAPARE是一种可靠有效的评估冠心病和心衰患者SDOH的工具,突出了其临床和研究应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Co-Development of a Group-Based Parenting Program for Parents of Youth in Psychiatric Residential Treatment. Effectiveness of HASMEP-Thai on CD4 Count and Health Outcomes in Thai MSM Living With HIV: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Role of Sleep Disturbances and Diabetes-Related Distress on Glycemic Control: A Path Analysis. Navigating Integration in Mixed-Methods: A Practical Guide for Novice Nursing Researchers. Psychosocial Factors Associated With Parental Self-Efficacy in Adolescent Suicide Prevention: A Mixed Methods Study Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1