Equalizing light and heavy litters with extra piglet relative to sow functional teats: impacts on lactational performance.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Tropical animal health and production Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s11250-025-04359-x
Laura Dos Santos, Gabriela Piovesan Zanin, Ingrid Camargo Lima, Ana Paula Gonçalves Mellagi, Fernando Pandolfo Bortolozzo, Rafael da Rosa Ulguim
{"title":"Equalizing light and heavy litters with extra piglet relative to sow functional teats: impacts on lactational performance.","authors":"Laura Dos Santos, Gabriela Piovesan Zanin, Ingrid Camargo Lima, Ana Paula Gonçalves Mellagi, Fernando Pandolfo Bortolozzo, Rafael da Rosa Ulguim","doi":"10.1007/s11250-025-04359-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effects of litter equalization with different weights and numbers of piglets relative to the number of functional teats on sow and piglet performance during lactation. Litters (n = 183) were equalized based on weight (light: 0.955-1.289 kg; heavy: ≥ 1.399-1.935 kg) and piglet number by total number of functional teats (Eq-0: same number of piglets and teats; Eq + 1: one extra piglet than the teat number). Sow body condition was evaluated during lactation. Piglets were individually weighed and evaluated for face, body, and joint injuries. Females lost more caliper units in heavy litters (-0.39; P = 0.05), with no interaction with Eq-0 or Eq + 1 (P = 0.11). There was no difference in the total number of piglets weaned (P ≥ 0.08) regardless of litter weight, number of piglets by functional teats, or their interaction. Weaning weight and average daily gain were positively affected (P < 0.01) in heavy (6.1 ± 0.1 kg; 227.9 ± 0.3 g/d) compared to light litters (5.5 ± 0.1 kg; 214.0 ± 0.3 g/d). Mortality was not affected by different groups (P ≥ 0.60). However, the percentage of piglets removed before weaning was higher for Eq + 1 (5.21 ± 0.75%) than Eq-0 litters (2.66 ± 0.49%; P < 0.01). Heavy litters had a higher percentage of piglets with facial, body, and joint injuries compared to light litters, regardless of the number of piglets by functional teats. Equalizing litters with one extra piglet resulted in a higher pre-weaning piglet removal rate. Body parameters of sows were not compromised comparing Eq-0 and Eq + 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":"57 2","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04359-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of litter equalization with different weights and numbers of piglets relative to the number of functional teats on sow and piglet performance during lactation. Litters (n = 183) were equalized based on weight (light: 0.955-1.289 kg; heavy: ≥ 1.399-1.935 kg) and piglet number by total number of functional teats (Eq-0: same number of piglets and teats; Eq + 1: one extra piglet than the teat number). Sow body condition was evaluated during lactation. Piglets were individually weighed and evaluated for face, body, and joint injuries. Females lost more caliper units in heavy litters (-0.39; P = 0.05), with no interaction with Eq-0 or Eq + 1 (P = 0.11). There was no difference in the total number of piglets weaned (P ≥ 0.08) regardless of litter weight, number of piglets by functional teats, or their interaction. Weaning weight and average daily gain were positively affected (P < 0.01) in heavy (6.1 ± 0.1 kg; 227.9 ± 0.3 g/d) compared to light litters (5.5 ± 0.1 kg; 214.0 ± 0.3 g/d). Mortality was not affected by different groups (P ≥ 0.60). However, the percentage of piglets removed before weaning was higher for Eq + 1 (5.21 ± 0.75%) than Eq-0 litters (2.66 ± 0.49%; P < 0.01). Heavy litters had a higher percentage of piglets with facial, body, and joint injuries compared to light litters, regardless of the number of piglets by functional teats. Equalizing litters with one extra piglet resulted in a higher pre-weaning piglet removal rate. Body parameters of sows were not compromised comparing Eq-0 and Eq + 1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡轻窝和重窝相对于母猪功能乳的多余仔猪:对泌乳性能的影响。
本研究评估了相对于功能性乳头数量的不同仔猪重量和数量的窝均化对母猪和仔猪泌乳期生产性能的影响。仔猪数(n = 183)根据体重(轻型:0.955-1.289 kg;重型:≥ 1.399-1.935 kg)和功能性乳头总数(Eq-0:仔猪数和乳头数相同;Eq + 1:比乳头数多一头仔猪)进行均衡。在哺乳期对母猪的体况进行评估。对仔猪进行单独称重,并评估其面部、身体和关节损伤情况。重胎母猪损失的卡尺单位更多 (-0.39; P = 0.05),与 Eq-0 或 Eq + 1 没有交互作用 (P = 0.11)。断奶仔猪总数没有差异(P ≥ 0.08),与窝重、功能乳头仔猪数或它们之间的交互作用无关。断奶重和平均日增重受到正向影响(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
期刊最新文献
Growth performance and nutrient digestibility of yearling Pedi goat bucks fed prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruit as a replacement for Cenchrus ciliaris hay. Role of Haematobia irritans as a potential vector of subclinical mastitis pathogens in dairy herds under tropical conditions. Predicting performance traits in Murrah buffaloes using machine learning: a comparative approach. Dietary threonine levels: effect on growth performance and gut organ measurements of indigenous Boschveld chickens. Seroprevalence of Akabane, border, and Rift Valley fever diseases and their risk factors in small ruminants of Fars Province, Southern Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1