Characterizing stone ablation with the thulium fiber laser: a single-pulse comparison of different pulse durations.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urolithiasis Pub Date : 2025-03-02 DOI:10.1007/s00240-025-01714-3
Ron Marom, Leilane Glienke, John W Robinson, Timothy L Hall, William W Roberts, Khurshid R Ghani
{"title":"Characterizing stone ablation with the thulium fiber laser: a single-pulse comparison of different pulse durations.","authors":"Ron Marom, Leilane Glienke, John W Robinson, Timothy L Hall, William W Roberts, Khurshid R Ghani","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01714-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stone ablation using the thulium fiber laser (TFL) at different pulse duration/peak power or laser fiber-to-stone distances requires further research to understand effective and safe settings. In this study we characterized the vapor bubble anatomy and stone crater morphology at various settings and standoff distances. Optical profiles of 1 J short pulse (SP), 1 J long pulse (LP), 3 J SP, and 2.4 J LP of a TFL system (Fiberdust, Quanta) were assessed. We used high-speed imaging and segmentation to quantify the vapor bubble. Using Begostones, stone craters from a single pulse at each setting were compared at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 mm standoff distances. The temporal optical profile of TFL is rectangular in shape with a peak power of ~ 180W (LP) and ~ 470W (SP). Increasing the pulse energy did not increase the peak power. LP generated a channel-like bubble while SP formed multiple generations of a spherical bubble. Ablation volume with SP was greater than LP for all distances (p < 0.001) with up to 350% increased crater volume at contact. Ablation reduced as distance increased with both modes. There was no ablation at > 1 mm distance with LP. For SP, increasing the pulse energy had minimal impact on crater depth. The SP creates a bubble geometry that tends to collapse more quickly in comparison to LP. Peak power of TFL is a function of pulse duration, not pulse energy. LP results in weak ablation. When using SP, increasing the pulse energy increased ablation volume by increasing crater area rather than depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01714-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stone ablation using the thulium fiber laser (TFL) at different pulse duration/peak power or laser fiber-to-stone distances requires further research to understand effective and safe settings. In this study we characterized the vapor bubble anatomy and stone crater morphology at various settings and standoff distances. Optical profiles of 1 J short pulse (SP), 1 J long pulse (LP), 3 J SP, and 2.4 J LP of a TFL system (Fiberdust, Quanta) were assessed. We used high-speed imaging and segmentation to quantify the vapor bubble. Using Begostones, stone craters from a single pulse at each setting were compared at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 mm standoff distances. The temporal optical profile of TFL is rectangular in shape with a peak power of ~ 180W (LP) and ~ 470W (SP). Increasing the pulse energy did not increase the peak power. LP generated a channel-like bubble while SP formed multiple generations of a spherical bubble. Ablation volume with SP was greater than LP for all distances (p < 0.001) with up to 350% increased crater volume at contact. Ablation reduced as distance increased with both modes. There was no ablation at > 1 mm distance with LP. For SP, increasing the pulse energy had minimal impact on crater depth. The SP creates a bubble geometry that tends to collapse more quickly in comparison to LP. Peak power of TFL is a function of pulse duration, not pulse energy. LP results in weak ablation. When using SP, increasing the pulse energy increased ablation volume by increasing crater area rather than depth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用铥光纤激光器表征石头烧蚀:不同脉冲持续时间的单脉冲比较。
使用铥光纤激光器(TFL)在不同脉冲持续时间/峰值功率或激光光纤到石头的距离下进行石头烧蚀,需要进一步研究以了解有效和安全的设置。本文研究了不同环境和距离下的蒸汽泡解剖和石坑形态。对一种TFL系统(Fiberdust, Quanta)的1 J短脉冲(SP)、1 J长脉冲(LP)、3 J SP和2.4 J LP的光学特性进行了评估。我们使用高速成像和分割来量化蒸汽泡。使用Begostones,在每一种设置下,在0,0.5,1,2和3mm的距离上比较单脉冲产生的石坑。TFL的时间光学轮廓呈矩形,峰值功率为~ 180W (LP)和~ 470W (SP)。增加脉冲能量并没有增加峰值功率。LP形成通道状气泡,SP形成多代球形气泡。在所有距离上,SP的消融体积都大于LP (p = 1mm)。对于SP,增加脉冲能量对火山口深度的影响最小。与LP相比,SP产生的气泡几何形状倾向于更快地破裂。TFL的峰值功率是脉冲持续时间的函数,而不是脉冲能量的函数。LP导致弱消融。当使用SP时,增加脉冲能量通过增加弹坑面积而不是深度来增加烧蚀体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Fiber-to-stone distance and fragment size with holmium laser lithotripsy. Impact of sampaio pelvicalyceal system variants on the clinical and surgical outcomes of supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adults. A computational model for predicting shock in patients at risk of urosepsis after urolithiasis surgery. The anatomy of a jackstone: a novel morphometric analysis of a rare urinary calculus. Comment on "Retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of stones in congenital anomalous kidneys: a case-matched comparative study with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1