Parviz K Kavoussi, Romtin Mehrabani-Farsi, Hayden T Henderson, Arya Farahi, Negar Farzaneh, Shahryar K Kavoussi
{"title":"The impact of abortion laws on the decision to undergo vasectomy.","authors":"Parviz K Kavoussi, Romtin Mehrabani-Farsi, Hayden T Henderson, Arya Farahi, Negar Farzaneh, Shahryar K Kavoussi","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.02.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess trends in men who underwent vasectomy before and after the Texas abortion law which passed on May 19, 2021, and the direct impact of the reversal of Roe v Wade on June 24, 2022, on the decision for vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective review of the electronic health records from a private reproductive urology center, including all consecutive patients undergoing vasectomy with no exclusions from 10/1/2010 to 6/26/2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was reviewed on 2,642 men who underwent vasectomy. After the Texas law change men were younger and had fewer children, there were a higher percentage without children, than those who underwent vasectomy prior. There were more single men who underwent vasectomy after. Of 377 men who underwent vasectomy following the overturning of Roe v Wade, 39.3% reported it directly impact their decision for vasectomy. The men who reported it impacted their decision had fewer number of children at the time of vasectomy. There was not a difference in marital status impacting the supreme court of the United States (SCOTUS) rulings effect on the decision for vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an association between the Texas abortion law and trends in younger men seeking vasectomy with fewer children, more men without children, and more single men opting for vasectomy following the law. Of men who underwent vasectomy following the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe v Wade, 39.3% reported the ruling directly impacted their decision for vasectomy. These men had fewer children at the time of vasectomy and no difference in marital status compared to men who the ruling did not impact their decision for vasectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.02.035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess trends in men who underwent vasectomy before and after the Texas abortion law which passed on May 19, 2021, and the direct impact of the reversal of Roe v Wade on June 24, 2022, on the decision for vasectomy.
Materials and methods: Retrospective review of the electronic health records from a private reproductive urology center, including all consecutive patients undergoing vasectomy with no exclusions from 10/1/2010 to 6/26/2022.
Results: Data was reviewed on 2,642 men who underwent vasectomy. After the Texas law change men were younger and had fewer children, there were a higher percentage without children, than those who underwent vasectomy prior. There were more single men who underwent vasectomy after. Of 377 men who underwent vasectomy following the overturning of Roe v Wade, 39.3% reported it directly impact their decision for vasectomy. The men who reported it impacted their decision had fewer number of children at the time of vasectomy. There was not a difference in marital status impacting the supreme court of the United States (SCOTUS) rulings effect on the decision for vasectomy.
Conclusions: There is an association between the Texas abortion law and trends in younger men seeking vasectomy with fewer children, more men without children, and more single men opting for vasectomy following the law. Of men who underwent vasectomy following the SCOTUS ruling overturning Roe v Wade, 39.3% reported the ruling directly impacted their decision for vasectomy. These men had fewer children at the time of vasectomy and no difference in marital status compared to men who the ruling did not impact their decision for vasectomy.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.