Quality assessment of automatically planned o-ring linac SBRT plans for pelvic lymph node and lung metastases, evaluating the optimal minimum target size.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Medical Dosimetry Pub Date : 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2025.01.008
Katerine Viviana Díaz Hernández, Sergejs Unterkirhers, Uwe Schneider
{"title":"Quality assessment of automatically planned o-ring linac SBRT plans for pelvic lymph node and lung metastases, evaluating the optimal minimum target size.","authors":"Katerine Viviana Díaz Hernández, Sergejs Unterkirhers, Uwe Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of Planning Target Volume (PTV) on the quality of automatic planned O-Ring Halcyon linac stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans of pelvic lymph nodes (LN) and lung metastases and to evaluate an absolute PTV volume threshold as a plan quality prediction criterion. A total of 21 pelvic LN and 18 lung clinical treatment plans were replanned for Halcyon with unattended autoplanning. The prescription dose range was 26-40 Gy for LN and between 39-54 Gy for the lung in the mean 3 fractions. The mean/median PTV was 4.0/ 3.6 cm<sup>3</sup> for LN and 4.9/ 4.3 cm<sup>3</sup> for the lung. The criteria for the plan quality evaluation consisted of using dose metrics for conformity, spillage, and coverage and dose limits on healthy tissue assessment. A statistical study was performed based on systematic Mann-Whitney U test and cluster analysis to evaluate a PTV volume predictor threshold of plan quality. 95% (n = 20) LN and 100% (n = 18) lung plans met all tolerance criteria. For both cohorts of plans, a PTV threshold was determined, indicating a reduction of particular dose indices when below this threshold. Low risk of toxicity in healthy tissues was predicted. A PTV threshold of 4.0 cm<sup>3</sup> was estimated as quality criteria in both cohorts of plans. The results of our study demonstrated the promising performance of Halcyon for pelvic and lung SBRT for small tumors, although plan-specific QA is required to verify machine performance during plan delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2025.01.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the influence of Planning Target Volume (PTV) on the quality of automatic planned O-Ring Halcyon linac stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans of pelvic lymph nodes (LN) and lung metastases and to evaluate an absolute PTV volume threshold as a plan quality prediction criterion. A total of 21 pelvic LN and 18 lung clinical treatment plans were replanned for Halcyon with unattended autoplanning. The prescription dose range was 26-40 Gy for LN and between 39-54 Gy for the lung in the mean 3 fractions. The mean/median PTV was 4.0/ 3.6 cm3 for LN and 4.9/ 4.3 cm3 for the lung. The criteria for the plan quality evaluation consisted of using dose metrics for conformity, spillage, and coverage and dose limits on healthy tissue assessment. A statistical study was performed based on systematic Mann-Whitney U test and cluster analysis to evaluate a PTV volume predictor threshold of plan quality. 95% (n = 20) LN and 100% (n = 18) lung plans met all tolerance criteria. For both cohorts of plans, a PTV threshold was determined, indicating a reduction of particular dose indices when below this threshold. Low risk of toxicity in healthy tissues was predicted. A PTV threshold of 4.0 cm3 was estimated as quality criteria in both cohorts of plans. The results of our study demonstrated the promising performance of Halcyon for pelvic and lung SBRT for small tumors, although plan-specific QA is required to verify machine performance during plan delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对盆腔淋巴结和肺转移瘤的自动规划 O-ring linac SBRT 计划进行质量评估,评价最佳最小靶点大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning prediction for lung dose in locally advanced esophageal cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy. Quality assessment of automatically planned o-ring linac SBRT plans for pelvic lymph node and lung metastases, evaluating the optimal minimum target size. Dosimetric comparison of HyperArc, conventional noncoplanar VMAT, and Halcyon-based coplanar VMAT in hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy. Assessing proton plans with 3 different beam lines vs photon plans for early-stage lung cancer. Assessment of automated non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery planning in single isocenteric linac-based treatment for brain metastases with respect to planner's experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1