Exactech Equinoxe Anatomic Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty For Primary Osteoarthritis with an Intact Rotator Cuff in Patients with No Glenoid Deformity.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.038
Kevin A Hao, Josie Elwell, Thomas W Wright, Joseph J King, Richard J Friedman, Bradley S Schoch
{"title":"Exactech Equinoxe Anatomic Versus Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty For Primary Osteoarthritis with an Intact Rotator Cuff in Patients with No Glenoid Deformity.","authors":"Kevin A Hao, Josie Elwell, Thomas W Wright, Joseph J King, Richard J Friedman, Bradley S Schoch","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies comparing anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA, rTSA) for rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis (RCI-GHOA) frequently fail to control for selection bias secondary to glenoid bone loss. Comparisons of similar patient populations without glenoid deformity may better evaluate potential differences in outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of a matched cohort of aTSA and rTSA patients with RCI-GHOA and no glenoid bone loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of primary aTSA/rTSA for RCI-GHOA with an A1 or B1 glenoid between 2007-2020 was performed. Matched cohorts were conceived based on age, sex, follow-up, Walch class, prior surgery, preoperative shoulder arthroplasty smart (SAS) score, preoperative forward elevation, and preoperative abduction. Range of motion, outcome scores, and rates of complications and reoperations were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 310 matched shoulders (155 aTSA, 155 rTSA) were evaluated at a mean 3.2 years follow-up. Postoperatively, aTSAs had more favorable abduction (146±27° vs. 133±26°, P<.001), internal rotation score (4.6±1.3 vs. 4.1±1.3, P=.004), external rotation (53±15° vs. 43±14°, P<.001), Constant score (73.6±10.5 vs. 70.5±12.8, P=.039), and SAS score (81.1±9.7 vs. 77.2±10.2, P=.002). However, when assessing improvement from preoperative state, only abduction remained significantly greater in the aTSA cohort (60° vs. 47°, P=.024). Patients undergoing aTSA achieved substantial clinical benefit at a higher rate for abduction (78% vs. 64%, P=.034) and external rotation (61% vs. 45%, P=.034). There was no difference in the incidence of complications (3.9% vs. 1.9%, P=.501) or revision surgery (3.2% vs. 0.6%, P=.214).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with RCI-GHOA with no bone loss, treatment with rTSA demonstrated similar improvements compared to a matched aTSA cohort except for less improvement in abduction. rTSA does not appear to offer functional benefits over aTSA in this population. Longer term follow-up of this cohort needs to be considered to assess the longitudinal functional and revision rates of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies comparing anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA, rTSA) for rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis (RCI-GHOA) frequently fail to control for selection bias secondary to glenoid bone loss. Comparisons of similar patient populations without glenoid deformity may better evaluate potential differences in outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of a matched cohort of aTSA and rTSA patients with RCI-GHOA and no glenoid bone loss.

Methods: A retrospective review of primary aTSA/rTSA for RCI-GHOA with an A1 or B1 glenoid between 2007-2020 was performed. Matched cohorts were conceived based on age, sex, follow-up, Walch class, prior surgery, preoperative shoulder arthroplasty smart (SAS) score, preoperative forward elevation, and preoperative abduction. Range of motion, outcome scores, and rates of complications and reoperations were compared.

Results: A total of 310 matched shoulders (155 aTSA, 155 rTSA) were evaluated at a mean 3.2 years follow-up. Postoperatively, aTSAs had more favorable abduction (146±27° vs. 133±26°, P<.001), internal rotation score (4.6±1.3 vs. 4.1±1.3, P=.004), external rotation (53±15° vs. 43±14°, P<.001), Constant score (73.6±10.5 vs. 70.5±12.8, P=.039), and SAS score (81.1±9.7 vs. 77.2±10.2, P=.002). However, when assessing improvement from preoperative state, only abduction remained significantly greater in the aTSA cohort (60° vs. 47°, P=.024). Patients undergoing aTSA achieved substantial clinical benefit at a higher rate for abduction (78% vs. 64%, P=.034) and external rotation (61% vs. 45%, P=.034). There was no difference in the incidence of complications (3.9% vs. 1.9%, P=.501) or revision surgery (3.2% vs. 0.6%, P=.214).

Conclusion: In patients with RCI-GHOA with no bone loss, treatment with rTSA demonstrated similar improvements compared to a matched aTSA cohort except for less improvement in abduction. rTSA does not appear to offer functional benefits over aTSA in this population. Longer term follow-up of this cohort needs to be considered to assess the longitudinal functional and revision rates of these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exactech Equinoxe Anatomic 与反向全肩关节置换术治疗原发性骨关节炎且肩袖完整的无盂成形畸形患者。
背景:比较解剖型和反向全肩关节置换术(aTSA、rTSA)治疗肩袖不接触性盂肱骨关节炎(RCI-GHOA)的研究常常无法控制盂骨缺失导致的选择偏差。对没有盂骨畸形的类似患者群体进行比较可以更好地评估结果的潜在差异。本研究的目的是比较具有 RCI-GHOA 且无盂骨缺损的 aTSA 和 rTSA 患者的匹配队列的结果:方法: 对2007-2020年期间A1或B1盂骨的RCI-GHOA初治aTSA/rTSA进行回顾性研究。根据年龄、性别、随访情况、Walch分级、既往手术情况、术前肩关节置换术智能(SAS)评分、术前前倾和术前外展情况构思了匹配队列。比较了活动范围、结果评分、并发症发生率和再次手术率:在平均 3.2 年的随访中,共对 310 个匹配的肩关节(155 个 aTSA,155 个 rTSA)进行了评估。术后,aTSA 的外展更好(146±27° vs. 133±26°,PC):在没有骨质流失的 RCI-GHOA 患者中,rTSA 与匹配的 aTSA 相比,除了外展改善较少外,其他方面都有类似的改善。需要考虑对该组患者进行更长期的随访,以评估这些患者的纵向功能和翻修率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Re-evaluating Surgical Treatment Protocol for Unstable Proximal Humerus Fractures: Emphasizing Soft Tissue Preservation via Minimally Invasive Approach over Structural Allograft Augmentation in Deltopectoral Approach: a Single-center Retrospective Study. 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of septic shoulder arthritis: metabolic uptake pattern and diagnostic performance. Assessment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty. Glenoid Version and Inclination Can be Accurately Predicted for Shoulder Arthroplasty from Preoperative Computed Tomography Scans Utilizing Virtual Implant PositioningTM Despite Missing Angulus Inferior Data Using Statistical Shape Modeling. Mapping the Microbial Landscape and Variations Based on Biological Sex, Age and Biopsy Location in the Shoulder Skin Microbiome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1