Mary R Habashy, Karena M Moran, Kelly Gallagher, Sandra Halbruner
{"title":"Evaluation of Universal Screening for Substance Use Risk on a Labor and Delivery Unit in Rural Pennsylvania.","authors":"Mary R Habashy, Karena M Moran, Kelly Gallagher, Sandra Halbruner","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate a newly implemented universal screening process for substance use on a labor and delivery (L&D) unit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Focused program evaluation using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health.</p><p><strong>Setting/local problem: </strong>An L&D unit in a community hospital that was part of a larger health system located in rural Pennsylvania with higher than state average rates of perinatal substance and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Women (n = 570) admitted to the L&D unit between July 2021 and July 2022 and the maternity care providers (i.e., nurses, certified nurse-midwives, and physicians; n = 22) on the L&D unit.</p><p><strong>Intervention/measurements: </strong>We analyzed screening rates; provider follow-up rates for at-risk screens; and staff perception of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Quick Screen and the modified Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST). We also collected staff feedback with open-ended questions in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The screening rate on the L&D unit during the study period was 89%. Maternity care providers ordered the appropriate follow-up on at-risk screens 88% of the time. Nurses and providers found the NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST to be an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible screening tool for identifying substance use risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The screening rate on the L&D unit was greater than the health system goal of 80%, whereas the provider follow-up rate was less than the goal of 100%. In open-ended feedback, staff identified ways to streamline the screening process; improve nurse, provider, and patient education; and enhance patient follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2025.01.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a newly implemented universal screening process for substance use on a labor and delivery (L&D) unit.
Design: Focused program evaluation using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health.
Setting/local problem: An L&D unit in a community hospital that was part of a larger health system located in rural Pennsylvania with higher than state average rates of perinatal substance and opioid use.
Participants: Women (n = 570) admitted to the L&D unit between July 2021 and July 2022 and the maternity care providers (i.e., nurses, certified nurse-midwives, and physicians; n = 22) on the L&D unit.
Intervention/measurements: We analyzed screening rates; provider follow-up rates for at-risk screens; and staff perception of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Quick Screen and the modified Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST). We also collected staff feedback with open-ended questions in the survey.
Results: The screening rate on the L&D unit during the study period was 89%. Maternity care providers ordered the appropriate follow-up on at-risk screens 88% of the time. Nurses and providers found the NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST to be an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible screening tool for identifying substance use risk.
Conclusion: The screening rate on the L&D unit was greater than the health system goal of 80%, whereas the provider follow-up rate was less than the goal of 100%. In open-ended feedback, staff identified ways to streamline the screening process; improve nurse, provider, and patient education; and enhance patient follow-up.
期刊介绍:
JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.