ADT with SBRT versus SBRT alone for hormone-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer (RADIOSA): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial

Giulia Marvaso, Giulia Corrao, Mattia Zaffaroni, Maria Giulia Vincini, Chiara Lorubbio, Sara Gandini, Cristiana Fodor, Sofia Netti, Dario Zerini, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta, Konstantinos Venetis, Giulia Cursano, Tiziana Burla, Ketti Mazzocco, Federica Cattani, Giuseppe Petralia, Nicola Fusco, Gabriella Pravettoni, Gennaro Musi, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
{"title":"ADT with SBRT versus SBRT alone for hormone-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer (RADIOSA): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial","authors":"Giulia Marvaso, Giulia Corrao, Mattia Zaffaroni, Maria Giulia Vincini, Chiara Lorubbio, Sara Gandini, Cristiana Fodor, Sofia Netti, Dario Zerini, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta, Konstantinos Venetis, Giulia Cursano, Tiziana Burla, Ketti Mazzocco, Federica Cattani, Giuseppe Petralia, Nicola Fusco, Gabriella Pravettoni, Gennaro Musi, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00730-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Metastasis-directed therapy by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in the oligometastatic prostate cancer setting. We aimed to investigate whether short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and SBRT at all oligometastatic sites versus SBRT alone improves clinical progression-free survival in men with metachronous oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.<h3>Methods</h3>The RADIOSA study was a single-centre, randomised, open-label, controlled phase 2 trial done in the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Key eligibility criteria were histologically proven initial diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate, biochemical progression after radical local prostate treatment, nodal relapse in the pelvis, extra-regional nodal relapse, bone metastases at next-generation imaging with a maximum of three lesions, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–1, and age 18 years or older. Participants were stratified according to prostate-specific membrane antigen doubling time (≤3 <em>vs</em> &gt;3 months), metastases localisation (node <em>vs</em> bone), and diagnostic imaging (positron emission tomography <em>vs</em> MRI) and were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated random number to SBRT alone or SBRT in combination with 6 months of ADT. For SBRT treatment, a schedule of 30 Gy in three fractions every other day (with the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions being 98·6 Gy, considering α/β ratio of 1·5 Gy and biologically effective dose of &gt;100 Gy), or equivalent regimens depending on disease site location, was administered. Patients in the SBRT with ADT group received 6 months of ADT with a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue within 1 week before the start of SBRT. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was clinical progression-free survival. All analyses followed a modified intention-to-treat principle, consisting of all patients assigned to a treatment group who had available data. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02680587, and is complete.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Aug 1, 2019, and April 30, 2023, 218 patients were assessed for eligibility, 113 were excluded, and 105 were enrolled and randomly assigned to an intervention (52 to SBRT only and 53 to SBRT with ADT). Three patients were lost to follow-up and 51 patients in each group were assessed for the primary outcome. The median age at study enrolment was 70 years (IQR 65–75); data on race and ethnicity were not collected. With a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 16–36) for both groups, the median clinical progression-free survival was 15·1 months (95% CI 12·4–22·8) for the SBRT group versus 32·2 months (22·4–not reached) for the SBRT with ADT group (hazard ratio 0·43 [95% CI 0·26–0·72], p=0·0010]). One gastrointestinal grade 1 adverse event (SBRT group) and one genitourinary grade 3 adverse event (left ureter stenosis, SBRT with ADT group) were reported, with no late toxicities observed. 22 grade 1 ADT-related adverse events were reported, all of which had resolved at the last follow-up. No treatment-related deaths were recorded.<h3>Interpretation</h3>To our knowledge, the RADIOSA trial represents the first randomised trial in the metachronous oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer setting to report improved clinical progression-free survival with the combination of SBRT and a short course of ADT, although carefully selected patients might still benefit from SBRT alone. By demonstrating improved clinical progression-free survival, the RADIOSA trial reinforces the role of metastasis-directed therapy in delaying systemic treatment escalation. Additionally, it underscores the need for further studies to determine the optimal duration of ADT and identify biomarkers predicting response to SBRT alone.<h3>Funding</h3>Italian Association of Cancer Research.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00730-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Metastasis-directed therapy by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in the oligometastatic prostate cancer setting. We aimed to investigate whether short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and SBRT at all oligometastatic sites versus SBRT alone improves clinical progression-free survival in men with metachronous oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Methods

The RADIOSA study was a single-centre, randomised, open-label, controlled phase 2 trial done in the European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Key eligibility criteria were histologically proven initial diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate, biochemical progression after radical local prostate treatment, nodal relapse in the pelvis, extra-regional nodal relapse, bone metastases at next-generation imaging with a maximum of three lesions, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–1, and age 18 years or older. Participants were stratified according to prostate-specific membrane antigen doubling time (≤3 vs >3 months), metastases localisation (node vs bone), and diagnostic imaging (positron emission tomography vs MRI) and were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated random number to SBRT alone or SBRT in combination with 6 months of ADT. For SBRT treatment, a schedule of 30 Gy in three fractions every other day (with the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions being 98·6 Gy, considering α/β ratio of 1·5 Gy and biologically effective dose of >100 Gy), or equivalent regimens depending on disease site location, was administered. Patients in the SBRT with ADT group received 6 months of ADT with a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue within 1 week before the start of SBRT. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was clinical progression-free survival. All analyses followed a modified intention-to-treat principle, consisting of all patients assigned to a treatment group who had available data. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02680587, and is complete.

Findings

Between Aug 1, 2019, and April 30, 2023, 218 patients were assessed for eligibility, 113 were excluded, and 105 were enrolled and randomly assigned to an intervention (52 to SBRT only and 53 to SBRT with ADT). Three patients were lost to follow-up and 51 patients in each group were assessed for the primary outcome. The median age at study enrolment was 70 years (IQR 65–75); data on race and ethnicity were not collected. With a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 16–36) for both groups, the median clinical progression-free survival was 15·1 months (95% CI 12·4–22·8) for the SBRT group versus 32·2 months (22·4–not reached) for the SBRT with ADT group (hazard ratio 0·43 [95% CI 0·26–0·72], p=0·0010]). One gastrointestinal grade 1 adverse event (SBRT group) and one genitourinary grade 3 adverse event (left ureter stenosis, SBRT with ADT group) were reported, with no late toxicities observed. 22 grade 1 ADT-related adverse events were reported, all of which had resolved at the last follow-up. No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Interpretation

To our knowledge, the RADIOSA trial represents the first randomised trial in the metachronous oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer setting to report improved clinical progression-free survival with the combination of SBRT and a short course of ADT, although carefully selected patients might still benefit from SBRT alone. By demonstrating improved clinical progression-free survival, the RADIOSA trial reinforces the role of metastasis-directed therapy in delaying systemic treatment escalation. Additionally, it underscores the need for further studies to determine the optimal duration of ADT and identify biomarkers predicting response to SBRT alone.

Funding

Italian Association of Cancer Research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ADT联合SBRT与单独SBRT治疗激素敏感性少复发性前列腺癌(RADIOSA):一项随机、开放标签、2期临床试验
背景:立体定向体放疗(SBRT)转移定向治疗已被证明可以改善少转移性前列腺癌的临床预后。我们的目的是研究短期雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)和SBRT在所有寡转移部位与单独SBRT相比,是否能提高异时性寡复发激素敏感前列腺癌患者的临床无进展生存期。方法RADIOSA研究是一项单中心、随机、开放标签、对照2期试验,在意大利米兰的欧洲肿瘤研究所(IRCCS)进行。主要入选标准为组织学证实的前列腺腺癌初始诊断、前列腺根治性局部治疗后的生化进展、骨盆淋巴结复发、区域外淋巴结复发、最多三个病灶的新一代影像学骨转移、东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)表现状态0-1、年龄18岁或以上。根据前列腺特异性膜抗原加倍时间(≤3 vs >;3个月)、转移灶定位(淋巴结vs骨)和诊断成像(正电子发射断层扫描vs MRI)对参与者进行分层,并使用计算机生成的随机数字随机分配(1:1)至单独SBRT或SBRT联合6个月ADT。对于SBRT治疗,每隔一天给予30 Gy的三次治疗方案(考虑到α/β比为1.5 Gy,生物有效剂量为100 Gy, 2 Gy的等效剂量为98.6 Gy),或根据疾病部位给予等效方案。SBRT联合ADT组患者在SBRT开始前1周内接受6个月的ADT和黄体生成素释放激素类似物。分配的治疗没有被掩盖。主要结局指标是临床无进展生存期。所有的分析都遵循改良的意向治疗原则,将所有患者分配到有可用数据的治疗组。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT02680587,目前已完成。在2019年8月1日至2023年4月30日期间,218例患者被评估为合格,113例被排除,105例被纳入并随机分配到干预组(52例仅接受SBRT治疗,53例接受SBRT联合ADT治疗)。3例患者失去随访,每组51例患者进行主要结局评估。入组时的中位年龄为70岁(IQR 65-75);没有收集有关种族和民族的数据。两组的中位随访时间为31个月(IQR为16-36),SBRT组的中位临床无进展生存期为15.1个月(95% CI为12.4 - 22.8),而SBRT联合ADT组的中位无进展生存期为32.2个月(未达到22.4)(风险比为0.43 [95% CI为0.26 - 0.72],p= 0.0010])。报告1例胃肠道1级不良事件(SBRT组)和1例泌尿生殖系统3级不良事件(左输尿管狭窄,SBRT联合ADT组),未观察到晚期毒性。报告了22例与adt相关的1级不良事件,所有不良事件在最后一次随访时均已解决。没有与治疗相关的死亡记录。据我们所知,RADIOSA试验是第一个在异时性寡转移激素敏感前列腺癌环境中报告SBRT联合短期ADT改善临床无进展生存的随机试验,尽管精心挑选的患者可能仍然受益于单独的SBRT。RADIOSA试验通过改善临床无进展生存期,加强了转移性治疗在延缓全身治疗升级方面的作用。此外,它强调需要进一步的研究来确定ADT的最佳持续时间,并确定预测单独SBRT反应的生物标志物。资助意大利癌症研究协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain and health-related quality-of-life outcomes with darolutamide in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ARANOTE): secondary and exploratory analyses of a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Senators demand explanation for US Preventive Services Task Force halt Canada's Yukon Territory publishes First Nations Cancer Strategy European Breast Cancer Conference 2026 Expanding the ADT-free therapeutic landscape in oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1