Abortion care in Alberta, Canada, from 2012 to 2023: a population-based, cross-sectional analysis of use and geographical access

IF 25.2 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Lancet Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00010-6
Erin A Brennand, Beili Huang, Natalie V Scime, Jadine Paw, Erin L Nelson
{"title":"Abortion care in Alberta, Canada, from 2012 to 2023: a population-based, cross-sectional analysis of use and geographical access","authors":"Erin A Brennand, Beili Huang, Natalie V Scime, Jadine Paw, Erin L Nelson","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00010-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Equitable access to abortion care remains a challenge in public health. Current Canadian abortion reporting overlooks modern practices such as mifepristone medication abortion and has no access and equity metrics. We aimed to comprehensively analyse abortion care provision in Alberta (the fourth largest province in Canada, home to more than 4 million people) focusing on temporal trends in annual abortion rates and access disparities.<h3>Methods</h3>In this population-based, repeated cross-sectional study using linked administrative databases (Practitioner Claims, Discharge Abstract Database, National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, and Pharmaceutical Information Network) in Alberta, Canada, we examined abortion use across the province over a 10-year period. Our data included all females of reproductive age (12–49 years) who received abortion care from Jan 1, 2012, to June 30, 2023. The primary outcome was abortion rate, calculated as the annual number of abortions per 1000 females of reproductive age (15–49 years), trimming data for those younger than 15 years. We descriptively analysed abortions (procedural, medication, and induction of labour) using temporal and geospatial analysis by Alberta's five geographical zones and 35 subzones.<h3>Findings</h3>During the study period, 130 755 abortions occurred in Alberta, of which 120 326 (92·0%) were procedural (118 063 [98·1%] of 120 326 first trimester; 2263 [1·9%] second trimester), 7395 (5·7%) were medication abortions, and 3034 (2·3%) were induction of labour. Abortion declined steadily between 2012 and 2023, with a change of –0·42 abortions per 1000 reproductive-aged females per year (95% CI –0·49 to –0·36). Medication abortion increased following the introduction of mifepristone and comprised 1489 (13·8%) of 10 765 abortions by 2022. Nearly all (8440 [99·7%] of 8462) procedural abortions in 2022 were provided in Edmonton and Calgary. 14 882 (11·5%) of 129 527 individuals accessing abortion in Alberta travelled more than 3 h from home to receive care; 18 864 (14·6%) travelled more than 200 km.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Our findings suggest that annual rates of abortion in Alberta are declining; however, overall access to abortion care has minimally improved in the past decade. Abortion in Alberta remains highly procedural and concentrated in Alberta's two major cities, resulting in poor access outside metropolitan centres. Mismatch between use of abortion care and local provision of care results in substantial travel. Policy should focus on expansion of patient-preferred, evidence-based medication abortion services.<h3>Funding</h3>Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Women and Gender Equality Canada","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00010-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Equitable access to abortion care remains a challenge in public health. Current Canadian abortion reporting overlooks modern practices such as mifepristone medication abortion and has no access and equity metrics. We aimed to comprehensively analyse abortion care provision in Alberta (the fourth largest province in Canada, home to more than 4 million people) focusing on temporal trends in annual abortion rates and access disparities.

Methods

In this population-based, repeated cross-sectional study using linked administrative databases (Practitioner Claims, Discharge Abstract Database, National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, and Pharmaceutical Information Network) in Alberta, Canada, we examined abortion use across the province over a 10-year period. Our data included all females of reproductive age (12–49 years) who received abortion care from Jan 1, 2012, to June 30, 2023. The primary outcome was abortion rate, calculated as the annual number of abortions per 1000 females of reproductive age (15–49 years), trimming data for those younger than 15 years. We descriptively analysed abortions (procedural, medication, and induction of labour) using temporal and geospatial analysis by Alberta's five geographical zones and 35 subzones.

Findings

During the study period, 130 755 abortions occurred in Alberta, of which 120 326 (92·0%) were procedural (118 063 [98·1%] of 120 326 first trimester; 2263 [1·9%] second trimester), 7395 (5·7%) were medication abortions, and 3034 (2·3%) were induction of labour. Abortion declined steadily between 2012 and 2023, with a change of –0·42 abortions per 1000 reproductive-aged females per year (95% CI –0·49 to –0·36). Medication abortion increased following the introduction of mifepristone and comprised 1489 (13·8%) of 10 765 abortions by 2022. Nearly all (8440 [99·7%] of 8462) procedural abortions in 2022 were provided in Edmonton and Calgary. 14 882 (11·5%) of 129 527 individuals accessing abortion in Alberta travelled more than 3 h from home to receive care; 18 864 (14·6%) travelled more than 200 km.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that annual rates of abortion in Alberta are declining; however, overall access to abortion care has minimally improved in the past decade. Abortion in Alberta remains highly procedural and concentrated in Alberta's two major cities, resulting in poor access outside metropolitan centres. Mismatch between use of abortion care and local provision of care results in substantial travel. Policy should focus on expansion of patient-preferred, evidence-based medication abortion services.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Women and Gender Equality Canada
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2012年至2023年加拿大阿尔伯塔省的堕胎护理:基于人口的使用和地理获取的横断面分析
公平获得堕胎护理仍然是公共卫生领域的一项挑战。目前加拿大堕胎报告忽略了现代实践,如米非司酮药物流产,没有访问和公平指标。我们的目的是全面分析阿尔伯塔省(加拿大第四大省,人口超过400万)的堕胎护理提供情况,重点关注年度堕胎率和获取差距的时间趋势。方法在这项以人群为基础的重复横断面研究中,我们使用了加拿大阿尔伯塔省相关的行政数据库(从业人员索赔、出院摘要数据库、国家门诊报告系统和药品信息网络),研究了该省10年来的堕胎使用情况。我们的数据包括2012年1月1日至2023年6月30日期间接受流产护理的所有育龄女性(12-49岁)。主要结果是流产率,以每年每1000名育龄女性(15 - 49岁)的流产数量计算,剔除15岁以下的数据。我们使用艾伯塔省五个地理区域和35个分区的时间和地理空间分析对堕胎(程序、药物和引产)进行了描述性分析。研究期间,艾伯塔省共发生130,755例流产,其中120,326例(92.5%)为手术流产(120,326例妊娠早期流产118,063例(98.1%);妊娠中期2263例(1.9%),药物流产7395例(5.7%),引产3034例(2.3%)。2012年至2023年间,堕胎率稳步下降,每年每1000名育龄女性的堕胎率为- 0.42 (95% CI为- 0.49至- 0.36)。引入米非司酮后药物流产增加,到2022年在10765例流产中占1489例(13.8%)。2022年,几乎所有(8462人中有8440人[99.7%])的手术流产都是在埃德蒙顿和卡尔加里进行的。在艾伯塔省进行流产的129527人中,有14882人(11.5%)从家到医院的路程超过3小时;18864人(14.6%)的行程超过200公里。我们的研究结果表明,阿尔伯塔省的年堕胎率正在下降;然而,在过去十年中,获得堕胎护理的总体情况改善甚微。阿尔伯塔省的堕胎仍然高度程序化,并集中在阿尔伯塔的两个主要城市,导致在大都市中心以外的地方很难获得堕胎服务。流产护理的使用与当地提供的护理之间的不匹配导致大量的旅行。政策应侧重于扩大患者首选的循证药物流产服务。资助加拿大卫生研究所;加拿大妇女与性别平等
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Public Health
Lancet Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
55.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Public Health is committed to tackling the most pressing issues across all aspects of public health. We have a strong commitment to using science to improve health equity and social justice. In line with the values and vision of The Lancet, we take a broad and inclusive approach to public health and are interested in interdisciplinary research. We publish a range of content types that can advance public health policies and outcomes. These include Articles, Review, Comment, and Correspondence. Learn more about the types of papers we publish.
期刊最新文献
Correction to Lancet Public Health 2026; 11: e156-63. Estimated effects of food taxes and subsidies on health, economics, and equity in Australia: a modelling study. Efficacy of front-of-package nutrient labels designed for mandatory implementation in the USA: an online randomised controlled trial. Gender-based violence against women and girls aged ≥15 years presenting to European emergency departments: a multinational, cross-sectional analysis. Front-of-pack food labelling in the USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1