Effect of Deviations from General Relativity on Searches for Gravitational-wave Microlensing and Type II Strong Lensing

Mick Wright, Justin Janquart and Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel
{"title":"Effect of Deviations from General Relativity on Searches for Gravitational-wave Microlensing and Type II Strong Lensing","authors":"Mick Wright, Justin Janquart and Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d3e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the gravitational-wave (GW) detector network is upgraded and the sensitivity of the detectors improves, novel scientific avenues open for exploration. For example, tests of general relativity (GR) will become more accurate as smaller deviations can be probed. Additionally, the detection of lensed GWs becomes more likely. However, these new avenues could also interact with each other, and a GW event presenting deviations from GR could be mistaken for a lensed one. Here, we explore how phenomenological deviations from GR or binaries of exotic compact objects could impact those lensing searches focusing on a single event. We consider strong lensing, millilensing, and microlensing, and find that certain phenomenological deviations from GR may be mistaken for all of these types of lensing. Therefore, our study shows that future candidate lensing events would need to be carefully examined to avoid a false claim of lensing where instead a deviation from GR has been seen.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d3e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the gravitational-wave (GW) detector network is upgraded and the sensitivity of the detectors improves, novel scientific avenues open for exploration. For example, tests of general relativity (GR) will become more accurate as smaller deviations can be probed. Additionally, the detection of lensed GWs becomes more likely. However, these new avenues could also interact with each other, and a GW event presenting deviations from GR could be mistaken for a lensed one. Here, we explore how phenomenological deviations from GR or binaries of exotic compact objects could impact those lensing searches focusing on a single event. We consider strong lensing, millilensing, and microlensing, and find that certain phenomenological deviations from GR may be mistaken for all of these types of lensing. Therefore, our study shows that future candidate lensing events would need to be carefully examined to avoid a false claim of lensing where instead a deviation from GR has been seen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广义相对论偏差对引力波微透镜和II型强透镜搜索的影响
随着引力波探测器网络的升级和探测器灵敏度的提高,新的科学探索途径正在开辟。例如,广义相对论(GR)的测试将变得更加准确,因为可以探测到更小的偏差。此外,更有可能检测到透镜GWs。然而,这些新途径也可能相互影响,而偏离GR的GW事件可能会被误认为是透镜事件。在这里,我们探讨了从GR或奇异致密天体的二元的现象学偏差如何影响那些聚焦于单个事件的透镜搜索。我们考虑了强透镜效应、千透镜效应和微透镜效应,并发现与广义相对论的某些现象偏差可能被误认为是所有这些类型的透镜效应。因此,我们的研究表明,未来的候选透镜事件需要仔细检查,以避免透镜的错误主张,而不是偏离GR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Keck/DEIMOS Stellar Archive. I. Uniform Velocities and Metallicities for 78 Milky Way Dwarf Galaxies and Globular Clusters The SPHEREx Satellite Mission Empirical Modeling of the Fast Solar Wind Rise of the Forsaken Relics: Connecting Present-day Stellar Streams and Phase-mixed Galaxies to the Epoch of Reionization When Magnetic Field Lines Stretch, Snap, and Expand: A New Look at Solar Flares with L-maps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1