Association between personality profiles and motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community-dwelling older adults: a person-centered approach.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06634-5
Junwei Zhang, Lina Wang, Chen Zhang, Xiaoyan Wang, Xue Sun, Chenyu Wang, Guanxiu Liu, Lulu Shi, Bei Wu
{"title":"Association between personality profiles and motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community-dwelling older adults: a person-centered approach.","authors":"Junwei Zhang, Lina Wang, Chen Zhang, Xiaoyan Wang, Xue Sun, Chenyu Wang, Guanxiu Liu, Lulu Shi, Bei Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06634-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome is a predementia syndrome characterized by subjective cognitive complaints and slow gait in the absence of dementia and mobility disability. Although past research has suggested that personality traits could play a significant role in the onset and progression of MCR among older adults, the exact relationships between specific personality profiles and MCR remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between personality profiles and MCR among community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2021 to January 2022. Personality traits, including openness, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and neuroticism, were measured using the 40-item brief version of the Chinese Big Five Inventory. The Latent profile analysis was used to identify personality profiles among these older adults who shared similar patterns of personality traits. The Lanza, Tan, and Bray's approach was employed to investigate the personality profile-specific differences in MCR prevalence. Furthermore, a stepwise multinomial logistic regression revealed unique population characteristics for different personality profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 538 eligible participants were included in this study. The mean age was 73.25 years (SD = 9.0) and 62.50% were females. This study identified four distinct personality profiles: the resilient, ordinary, reserved, and anti-resilient profiles. The resilient profile exhibited the lowest prevalence of MCR (mean = 6%, SE = 0.024), whereas the anti-resilient profile had the highest (mean = 20.3%, SE = 0.043). The prevalence of MCR differed among personality profiles (overall χ<sup>2</sup> = 14.599, p = 0.002). Personality profile membership was characterized by different population characteristics. Notably, the anti-resilient profile was association with symptoms of depression (OR = 28.443, 95%CI = 11.095-72.912), while the reserved profile was linked with advanced age (OR = 1.031, 95%CI = 1.003-1.061). Overall, a low education level and poor sleep quality were the robust attribution factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that personality profiles may assist in identifying older adults at greater risk of MCR. Increased awareness and management of personality profiles may contribute to the prevention of MCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11874118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06634-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome is a predementia syndrome characterized by subjective cognitive complaints and slow gait in the absence of dementia and mobility disability. Although past research has suggested that personality traits could play a significant role in the onset and progression of MCR among older adults, the exact relationships between specific personality profiles and MCR remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between personality profiles and MCR among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2021 to January 2022. Personality traits, including openness, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness and neuroticism, were measured using the 40-item brief version of the Chinese Big Five Inventory. The Latent profile analysis was used to identify personality profiles among these older adults who shared similar patterns of personality traits. The Lanza, Tan, and Bray's approach was employed to investigate the personality profile-specific differences in MCR prevalence. Furthermore, a stepwise multinomial logistic regression revealed unique population characteristics for different personality profiles.

Results: A total of 538 eligible participants were included in this study. The mean age was 73.25 years (SD = 9.0) and 62.50% were females. This study identified four distinct personality profiles: the resilient, ordinary, reserved, and anti-resilient profiles. The resilient profile exhibited the lowest prevalence of MCR (mean = 6%, SE = 0.024), whereas the anti-resilient profile had the highest (mean = 20.3%, SE = 0.043). The prevalence of MCR differed among personality profiles (overall χ2 = 14.599, p = 0.002). Personality profile membership was characterized by different population characteristics. Notably, the anti-resilient profile was association with symptoms of depression (OR = 28.443, 95%CI = 11.095-72.912), while the reserved profile was linked with advanced age (OR = 1.031, 95%CI = 1.003-1.061). Overall, a low education level and poor sleep quality were the robust attribution factors.

Conclusions: This study revealed that personality profiles may assist in identifying older adults at greater risk of MCR. Increased awareness and management of personality profiles may contribute to the prevention of MCR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区居住老年人人格特征与运动认知风险综合征之间的关系:以人为中心的方法。
背景:运动认知风险综合征(MCR)是一种痴呆前综合征,在没有痴呆和行动障碍的情况下,以主观认知主诉和步态缓慢为特征。尽管过去的研究表明,人格特征可能在老年人MCR的发病和发展中发挥重要作用,但具体人格特征与MCR之间的确切关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨社区居住老年人人格特征与MCR之间的关系。方法:于2021年3月至2022年1月进行横断面研究。性格特征,包括开放性、外向性、宜人性、严谨性和神经质,使用40个项目的中国大五人格量表进行测量。潜在轮廓分析用于识别这些具有相似人格特征模式的老年人的人格特征。采用Lanza, Tan和Bray的方法来调查MCR患病率的个性特征差异。此外,逐步多项逻辑回归揭示了不同人格特征的独特群体特征。结果:本研究共纳入538名符合条件的受试者。平均年龄73.25岁(SD = 9.0),女性占62.50%。这项研究确定了四种不同的性格特征:弹性、普通、保守和反弹性。弹性区MCR患病率最低(平均6%,SE = 0.024),而抗弹性区MCR患病率最高(平均20.3%,SE = 0.043)。MCR患病率在不同人格类型间存在差异(χ2 = 14.599, p = 0.002)。人格谱隶属度具有不同的群体特征。值得注意的是,抗弹性谱与抑郁症状相关(OR = 28.443, 95%CI = 11.095-72.912),而保留谱与高龄相关(OR = 1.031, 95%CI = 1.003-1.061)。总体而言,教育水平低和睡眠质量差是显著的归因因素。结论:本研究揭示了人格特征可能有助于识别MCR风险较高的老年人。提高对人格特征的认识和管理可能有助于预防MCR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between negative life events and anhedonia among patients with major depressive disorder: chain mediation of insomnia and dysfunctional attitudes. High-gamma tACS may regulate brain network connectivity to alleviate symptoms in female adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: a preliminary TMS-EEG pilot study. Prevalence of sleep disturbance among chinese college students: an updated meta-analysis. Openness to discussing mental health is negatively associated with suicidal ideation among South Korean college students. Blunted niacin skin flushing response with subtype-specific clinical associations in adolescent bipolar disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1