Trends and surgical outcomes in laparoscopic and open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical nephrology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.5414/CN111497
Ankur D Shah, Susie L Hu, Anvitha Rangan, Adena J Osband, Christina A Raker
{"title":"Trends and surgical outcomes in laparoscopic and open peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion.","authors":"Ankur D Shah, Susie L Hu, Anvitha Rangan, Adena J Osband, Christina A Raker","doi":"10.5414/CN111497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters can be inserted via open or laparoscopic techniques. Recent guidelines suggest advanced laparoscopic insertion for suitable patients, due to known catheter-related benefits, but surgical outcomes literature is lacking.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 11,731 PD catheter insertions from 2013 - 2018 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, including preoperative characteristics, operative details, and 30-day outcomes. Trends over time and factors associated with approach were assessed. Logistic regression examined the association between approach and postoperative mortality, complications, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laparoscopic PD catheter insertions increased from 76.1 to 87% of cases over the study period (p < 0.0001). Compared to laparoscopic procedures, open insertions were performed in older patients (58.8 vs. 58.1 years) with higher comorbidity. After adjustment, odds of 30-day mortality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.72 - 1.89), surgical site infections (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.66), and other complications were similar between groups, although length of stay > 7 days remained modestly higher for open procedures (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of laparoscopic PD catheter insertion has steadily increased from 2013 - 2018. After accounting for confounders, laparoscopic and open techniques had comparable early morbidity and mortality. These real-world data indicate increasing adoption of laparoscopic insertion as the predominant approach for PD access creation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10396,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"326-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters can be inserted via open or laparoscopic techniques. Recent guidelines suggest advanced laparoscopic insertion for suitable patients, due to known catheter-related benefits, but surgical outcomes literature is lacking.

Materials and methods: We analyzed 11,731 PD catheter insertions from 2013 - 2018 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, including preoperative characteristics, operative details, and 30-day outcomes. Trends over time and factors associated with approach were assessed. Logistic regression examined the association between approach and postoperative mortality, complications, and length of stay.

Results: Laparoscopic PD catheter insertions increased from 76.1 to 87% of cases over the study period (p < 0.0001). Compared to laparoscopic procedures, open insertions were performed in older patients (58.8 vs. 58.1 years) with higher comorbidity. After adjustment, odds of 30-day mortality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.72 - 1.89), surgical site infections (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.66), and other complications were similar between groups, although length of stay > 7 days remained modestly higher for open procedures (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.99).

Conclusion: Use of laparoscopic PD catheter insertion has steadily increased from 2013 - 2018. After accounting for confounders, laparoscopic and open techniques had comparable early morbidity and mortality. These real-world data indicate increasing adoption of laparoscopic insertion as the predominant approach for PD access creation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜和开放式腹膜透析置管的趋势和手术结果。
背景:腹膜透析(PD)导管可以通过开放或腹腔镜技术插入。由于导管相关的益处,最近的指南建议对合适的患者进行先进的腹腔镜插入,但缺乏手术结果的文献。材料和方法:我们分析了2013 - 2018年国家外科质量改进计划数据库中的11,731例PD导管置入,包括术前特征、手术细节和30天预后。评估了随时间推移的趋势和与方法相关的因素。Logistic回归分析了入路与术后死亡率、并发症和住院时间之间的关系。结果:在研究期间,腹腔镜下PD导管置入率从76.1增加到87% (p < 0.0001)。与腹腔镜手术相比,年龄较大的患者(58.8岁vs. 58.1岁)进行开放插入手术,合并症较高。调整后,30天死亡率(OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.72 - 1.89)、手术部位感染(OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.84 - 1.66)和其他并发症的几率在两组之间相似,尽管开放手术的住院时间(OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.99)仍略高于开放手术(OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.99)。结论:2013 - 2018年,腹腔镜PD导管置入率稳步上升。在考虑混杂因素后,腹腔镜和开放式技术具有相当的早期发病率和死亡率。这些真实世界的数据表明越来越多的采用腹腔镜插入作为PD通路创建的主要方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nephrology
Clinical nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nephrology appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: prophylaxis, pathophysiology, immunology, diagnosis, therapy, experimental approaches and dialysis and transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Impact of immune marker-based microinflammation on dialysis efficacy in diabetic nephropathy patients: Development of an early prediction model. Relationship of serum α-Klotho with diabetic kidney disease and mortality in diabetes: A population-based observational study. Clinical relevance of transplant renal vein stenosis in the early post-operative period. Diversifying aquapheresis in critical care: An institutional experience. Dose response of PTH and FGF23 to paricalcitol in patients with end-stage renal failure on chronic intermittent hemodialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1