Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of pain and symptom management Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.471
Jenny T. van der Steen MSc, PhD, FGSA , Lieve Van den Block PhD , Miharu Nakanishi RN, PhD , Karen Harrison Dening RN, RNM, RNLD, MA, PhD , Deborah Parker RN, PhD , Philip Larkin PhD, MSc, RN, RCN, RNT , Paola Di Giulio RN, MSc , Jürgen in der Schmitten MD, MPH , Rebecca L. Sudore MD , Ninoslav Mimica MD, MSc, PhD, IFAPA , Iva Holmerova MD, PhD , Sandra Martins Pereira RN, MSc, PhD , Ida J. Korfage PhD , European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC)
{"title":"Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study","authors":"Jenny T. van der Steen MSc, PhD, FGSA ,&nbsp;Lieve Van den Block PhD ,&nbsp;Miharu Nakanishi RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Karen Harrison Dening RN, RNM, RNLD, MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Deborah Parker RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Philip Larkin PhD, MSc, RN, RCN, RNT ,&nbsp;Paola Di Giulio RN, MSc ,&nbsp;Jürgen in der Schmitten MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Sudore MD ,&nbsp;Ninoslav Mimica MD, MSc, PhD, IFAPA ,&nbsp;Iva Holmerova MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sandra Martins Pereira RN, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Ida J. Korfage PhD ,&nbsp;European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC)","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Advance care planning (ACP) is relevant yet challenging with cognitive decline.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide evidence and consensus-based clinical recommendations for how to conduct ACP in dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>International Delphi study conducted by the European Association for Palliative Care ‘ACP in dementia’ taskforce with four online surveys (September 2021-June 2022). A panel of 107 experts from 33 countries and seven individuals with dementia contributed. The recommendations specific for dementia were initially based on two earlier Delphi studies and literature searches addressing guidance including the right timing and how to personalize ACP. We used conservative preregistered criteria for consensus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty constitutive elements of ACP were identified (e.g., ‘assess understanding of ACP’). Only five were deemed ‘optional.’ The panel estimated a median of four conversations could address elements to be addressed at least once. Recommendations included to assume capacity as a principle, conscious of the need to explore its fluctuation, to encourage engaging and playing active roles, and to establish connection and inform and prepare family. There was a consensus to offer ACP around dementia diagnosis, to raise end-of-life issues later, and to personalize ACP with flexibility, providing of information and exploring understanding. The advice of the persons with dementia pointed to a wish for a well-coordinated holistic approach.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Consensus was reached, including in areas of ambiguity, to guide ACP in dementia. ACP should be embedded in a nonprescriptive, individualized approach that involves both the person with dementia and their families. Future studies may evaluate trade-offs between optimal ACP and feasible implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":"69 6","pages":"Pages e755-e772"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392425005329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Advance care planning (ACP) is relevant yet challenging with cognitive decline.

Objective

To provide evidence and consensus-based clinical recommendations for how to conduct ACP in dementia.

Methods

International Delphi study conducted by the European Association for Palliative Care ‘ACP in dementia’ taskforce with four online surveys (September 2021-June 2022). A panel of 107 experts from 33 countries and seven individuals with dementia contributed. The recommendations specific for dementia were initially based on two earlier Delphi studies and literature searches addressing guidance including the right timing and how to personalize ACP. We used conservative preregistered criteria for consensus.

Results

Thirty constitutive elements of ACP were identified (e.g., ‘assess understanding of ACP’). Only five were deemed ‘optional.’ The panel estimated a median of four conversations could address elements to be addressed at least once. Recommendations included to assume capacity as a principle, conscious of the need to explore its fluctuation, to encourage engaging and playing active roles, and to establish connection and inform and prepare family. There was a consensus to offer ACP around dementia diagnosis, to raise end-of-life issues later, and to personalize ACP with flexibility, providing of information and exploring understanding. The advice of the persons with dementia pointed to a wish for a well-coordinated holistic approach.

Conclusion

Consensus was reached, including in areas of ambiguity, to guide ACP in dementia. ACP should be embedded in a nonprescriptive, individualized approach that involves both the person with dementia and their families. Future studies may evaluate trade-offs between optimal ACP and feasible implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化痴呆症的预先护理计划:来自33个国家德尔菲研究的建议。
背景:。预先护理计划(ACP)与认知能力下降相关,但具有挑战性。目的:。为如何在痴呆中进行ACP提供证据和基于共识的临床建议。方法:。由欧洲姑息治疗协会“痴呆症ACP”工作组进行的国际德尔菲研究,包括四项在线调查(2021年9月至2022年6月)。由来自33个国家的107名专家和7名痴呆症患者组成的小组做出了贡献。针对痴呆症的具体建议最初是基于两个早期的德尔菲研究和文献搜索,包括正确的时间和如何个性化ACP的指导。我们使用保守的预登记标准来达成共识。结果:。确定了ACP的30个构成要素(例如,“评估对ACP的理解”)。只有五项被视为“可选”。该小组估计,中位数为四次的对话可以讨论至少要讨论一次的问题。建议包括将承担能力作为一项原则,意识到需要探索其波动,鼓励参与和发挥积极作用,建立联系,通知和准备家庭。达成共识的是,围绕痴呆症诊断提供ACP,稍后提出临终问题,并灵活地个性化ACP,提供信息并探索理解。痴呆症患者的建议指出,希望采取协调良好的整体方法。结论:。达成了共识,包括在不明确的领域,以指导老年痴呆症的ACP。ACP应纳入一种非规定性的、个性化的方法,涉及痴呆症患者及其家人。未来的研究可能会评估最优ACP和可行实施之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
期刊最新文献
Abu's Final Lesson: Courage to Have Difficult Conversations The Effectiveness and Safety of Buprenorphine in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials, Prospective and Retrospective Studies Acupuncture as Adjunctive Therapy for Cervical Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis The State of Palliative Care in Nigeria: A Scoping Review Considering Parental Requests to Withdraw Life-Sustaining Care in Seriously Ill Children: A Case Report and Ethical Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1